Skip to main content

1-20 of 89 results for subject:"Shipman, Harold"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what his policy is on (a) doctors and (b) other qualified medical personnel administering pain-relieving drugs which may shorten lives; and whether regulations on that issue changed after the conviction of Harold Shipman.

Asked by
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 December 2024
Reference
17065
House
House of Commons

Westminster Hall debate on a motion for the adjournment on the Shipman Inquiry.

Lead member
Andy Burnham
Answering member
Lord Lansley
Department
Department of Health
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
21 June 2007
Reference
461 c509-44WH
House
House of Commons

Yes, I agree. The package of reform that we introduced in February does retain the system of independent self-regulation and suggests a parity between lay and professional representation within the main regulatory bodies and that those appointees should be independently appointed. It is important to ensure that the public have...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2007
Reference
461 c511-2WH
House
House of Commons

I welcome the way in which the Minister has introduced the topic. May I explore an issue with him? He maintained that doctors are more trusted than most other groups, and I certainly agree with that. The point that I would like him to address is that they are still...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2007
Reference
461 c510-1WH
House
House of Commons

I am pleased that we have been able to secure time this afternoon to debate the findings of the Shipman inquiry, which dealt with a matter of huge significance that has far-reaching ramifications for several Government Departments and which raised matters of great horror for the families who were affected...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2007
Reference
461 c509-10WH
House
House of Commons

I share the gratitude of our colleague, the hon. Member for Oxford, West and Abingdon (Dr. Harris), for the manner in which the Minister is introducing the debate. As we are establishing the principles that we should apply, does he agree that the enormity of what Harold Shipman did and...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2007
Reference
461 c511WH
House
House of Commons

I agree entirely with the hon. Gentleman. The guiding principle of every measure that has been and will be introduced—there is, of course, some considerable way to go before we have done full justice to this hugely significant inquiry—is the protection of patients and the public. All the measures that...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2007
Reference
461 c511WH
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for the opportunity to speak on behalf of my constituents in Calder Valley and those of the Minister for Pensions Reform, my hon. Friend the Member for Stalybridge and Hyde (James Purnell), who, as you pointed out, Mr. Hancock, is in the Chamber but may not speak...

Member
Chris McCafferty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2007
Reference
461 c521-3WH
House
House of Commons

It is a privilege to follow my hon. Friend the Member for Calder Valley (Chris McCafferty). She and the Minister for Pensions Reform, my hon. Friend the Member for Stalybridge and Hyde (James Purnell), have been at the forefront of the campaign for justice for Dr. Harold Shipman’s victims. I...

Member
Andrew Gwynne (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2007
Reference
461 c523-5WH
House
House of Commons

I agree entirely that that is what we need to create. The systems that we are describing should transcend all organisational boundaries and apply right across the piece. Different organisations will seek to achieve the same ends in different ways, but the principles should transcend organisational boundaries and apply equally...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2007
Reference
461 c520-1WH
House
House of Commons

I take the point made by the hon. Member for Oxford, West and Abingdon. It was, perhaps, inadvisable of me to suggest that that label could be applied to the Bill. I was seeking to make a point about the breadth and depth of the reports from Dame Janet Smith’s...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2007
Reference
461 c517-20WH
House
House of Commons

I am prompted to intervene by the Minister’s remark about the relationship between professional regulation and clinical governance among NHS employers. If I recall correctly—I do not have the quotation to hand—Dame Janet Smith was clear about the desirability of ensuring that we did not rely excessively on NHS clinical...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2007
Reference
461 c520WH
House
House of Commons

Dr. Harris.

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2007
Reference
461 c517WH
House
House of Commons

It is important that I say that I do not agree with the point that Government regulation is being proposed. We are proposing to maintain the system of professional self-regulation. It is as a result of the counsel of the regulators that we are proposing parity between the professional and...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2007
Reference
461 c527WH
House
House of Commons

I was shocked that you had even made a mistake, Mr. Hancock, such is your reputation for accuracy. I certainly did not take it personally. I hope that you do not mind me not taking it personally if you misaddress me, because I know that you are a perfectionist in...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2007
Reference
461 c526-7WH
House
House of Commons

Or two Bills.

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2007
Reference
461 c516WH
House
House of Commons

In July.

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2007
Reference
461 c514WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for that. The Committee talked about the importance of the system of death certification, and, because of the interrelationship between the coroners’ system and that for death certification, to which recommendations 5 and 6 of the report apply, asked the Government to come back to...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2007
Reference
461 c514-6WH
House
House of Commons

I do not want to intrude on the private grief of Departments trying to resolve these matters between themselves, but I have a question. I am not clear about the extent to which some aspects of reform, such as the establishment of medical examiners in primary care trusts, which clearly...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2007
Reference
461 c516WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman will accept that these matters are extremely complex and of huge import for everybody—for the whole of society. I hope—speaking openly, for once—that we might have a Bill at the end of this process. It would be wrong to call it the Shipman Bill, but it would...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2007
Reference
461 c516WH
House
House of Commons