Skip to main content

1-20 of 100 results for subject:"Social costs"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Motion that this House has considered Government policy on AI and its impact on society. Motion lapsed.

Lead member
Neil Duncan-Jordan
Answering member
Ben Spencer; James Frith
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Debates
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
789 cc154-179WH
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered Government policy on AI and its impact on society.

It is a pleasure to serve with you in the Chair, Ms McVey. I think we all agree that AI is a transformational technology with the potential to bring many benefits to our society,...

Member
Neil Duncan-Jordan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
789 c154WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is making a powerful point about big foreign tech companies. Does he believe that our dependency on six tech companies in all aspects of our lives poses a national security threat and needs to be assessed as such?

Member
Iqbal Mohamed (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
789 c154WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Member for his intervention; I will deal with AI sovereignty a bit later in my speech.

We should ensure that, like a socialist Government’s approach to energy or water, the public have a stake in the development of AI technology, to ensure that the value it creates...

Member
Neil Duncan-Jordan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
789 c154WH
House
House of Commons

The last time we saw a change of such potential scale was when we moved from being a manufacturing economy to being more of a service economy. There were trade-offs at that time, and some people, cities, towns and villages were left behind—including in my constituency. Does my hon. Friend...

Member
Lee Pitcher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
789 c155WH
House
House of Commons

I absolutely agree with my hon. Friend’s point about no place being left behind as a result of the AI revolution. I will develop that point a later. We can already see the first signs of AI impacting on work here. We have record numbers of young people not in...

Member
Neil Duncan-Jordan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
789 c155WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Gentleman on securing the debate. I spoke to him beforehand; he knows where I am coming from. My concern is for the young people of today looking for the jobs of tomorrow. My grandchildren will have to prepare themselves. We must try to equip young people....

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
789 c155WH
House
House of Commons

Yes, young people and their employment prospects are intrinsically linked to the debate about the future of AI. The hon. Gentleman is right that we have to get that right for those people to have a future.

We also need the Government to introduce a raft of measures to manage AI-driven...

Member
Neil Duncan-Jordan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
789 cc155-6WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is focusing on employment and big tech companies; does he agree that we need to go a step back—back to school, teachers and training? Teachers need to prepare their pupils for the future with AI, and for what that means. Does the hon. Gentleman feel that that...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
789 c156WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his second intervention—let us see whether he can make it a hat trick before I finish. The reality is that AI is here now. We have to deal with how it impacts on today’s workers and future workers as well. This is not one...

Member
Neil Duncan-Jordan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
789 c156WH
House
House of Commons

I apologise in advance, Ms McVey, that I need to go to a Select Committee so cannot attend the full debate. My hon. Friend is, as usual, right about everything. Does he agree that public resistance to the construction of data centres is due not just to concern about the...

Member
Chris Hinchliff (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
789 c157WH
House
House of Commons

One data centre, even a modest one, uses the same amount of electricity as 100,000 homes. The bigger the data centre, the more electricity it uses. Very few of them run off renewables, so that is another issue we need to address. The communities that host the infrastructure see the...

Member
Neil Duncan-Jordan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
789 c157WH
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
789 c157WH
House
House of Commons

I rise in support of much of what the hon. Member for Poole (Neil Duncan-Jordan) has said. He has done a service to this Chamber, and Parliament more generally, by highlighting the threats that AI will bring.

Perhaps I can set the scene by reminding Members present that it took 25...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
789 cc157-8WH
House
House of Commons

Does the right hon. Gentleman agree that one of the primary obligations of any Government is to keep their citizens and the people living in their country safe from all avoidable harms? AI is a major potential cause of harm, and it is avoidable. Does he agree that the Government...

Member
Iqbal Mohamed (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
789 c158WH
House
House of Commons

I absolutely agree. That is why I began by describing what has occurred over the last quarter of a century and the misunderstanding—a pervasive one that affected all political parties and Governments of all kinds—that a dangerous fascination with novelty was more important than the certainty that I have just...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
789 c158WH
House
House of Commons

On the point about proportionality, a lot of concerns about AI have rightly been raised in the debate, but let me sound a more positive note about public services. In my constituency, North Kerrier integrated neighbourhood team, which covers one of the most deprived regions in the UK, is using...

Member
Perran Moon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
789 c159WH
House
House of Commons

I know from my dealings with the hon. Gentleman that he is a good and effective Member of Parliament who takes a very responsible view of these things, but we must not let the virtues that he describes blind us to the vices. That is what happened with the internet....

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
789 c159WH
House
House of Commons

It is a real pleasure to speak in this debate. I am very grateful to my hon. Friend the Member for Poole (Neil Duncan-Jordan) for securing it, and I agree with many of his remarks and those made by other speakers. I particularly agree with his remarks about the New...

Member
Anneliese Dodds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
789 cc159-160WH
House
House of Commons

AI is increasingly being used to make cutting-edge assistive technology for people with special educational needs and disabilities, but the industry is a bit of a wild west, and access for young people in areas such as Yeovil is uneven. Will the hon. Member join me in urging the Government...

Member
Adam Dance (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
789 c160WH
House
House of Commons