Skip to main content

1-20 of 53 results for subject:"Stalker, John"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Home Affairs Committee
Notes
Received 26.05.99
Date
19 May 1999
Reference
HC 467 1998/99
House
House of Commons
Lords statement announcing completion of consideration of document handed to them on 25th January by Mr John Stalker
Asked by
Lord Gainford (Conservative)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
4 April 1990
Reference
517 c1502-4
House
House of Lords

Statement on Sec of States consideration of document handed to his private sec on 25 Jan by Mr John Stalker

Asked by
John Wheeler (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 April 1990
Reference
170 c640-1W
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Earl Ferrers (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
4 April 1990
Reference
517 c1502-4
House
House of Lords

Further to 167 c53W, if any aspect of the Stalker inquiry was on the agenda at the meeting held on 12 June 1986.

Asked by
John Marek (Labour)
Answering body
Northern Ireland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 February 1990
Reference
167 c765W;167 c773W
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Waddington (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
25 January 1990
Reference
165 c1040-1
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on DPP & trial of Kevin Taylor & case of John Stalker.
Asked by
Barry Sheerman (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Home Office
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
25 January 1990
Reference
165 c1040-1
House
House of Commons

What has been criterion in past when independent judicial inquiries have been instituted to inquire into matters of national importance & interest; & whether these criteria are applicable in matters appertaining to Mr John Stalker.

Asked by
Cecil Franks (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 January 1990
Reference
165 c892W;165 c890W
House
House of Commons
When Sec of State last met the DPP & what was discussed.
Asked by
Andrew Smith (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
25 January 1990
Reference
165 c1039
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Waddington (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
25 January 1990
Reference
165 c1039
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Waddington (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
25 January 1990
Reference
165 c1039
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on case of Kevin Taylor calling for inquiry into Stalker affair.
Asked by
Andrew Smith (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
25 January 1990
Reference
165 c1039
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on Stalker case & concept of equality before the law.
Asked by
Cecil Franks (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
23 January 1990
Reference
165 c736-7;165 c737
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Baroness Thatcher (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
23 January 1990
Reference
165 c736-7;165 c737
House
House of Commons

To institute an independent judicial inquiry with full powers to compel witnesses to attend & give evidence into circumstances surrounding those matters concerning Mr John Stalker former deputy chief constable of Greater Manchester police & Mr Kevin Taylor & into wider implications of those matters.

Asked by
Cecil Franks (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 January 1990
Reference
165 c514W;165 c512W
House
House of Commons

How many RUC officers have been subject of disciplinary proceedings, dismissed from RUC, required to resign, allowed to resign due to ill health, permitted to take premature retirement, demoted, reprimanded or otherwise disciplined, following events investigated by Mr Stalker & Mr Sampson - Incl fact that disciplinary proceedings have not...

Asked by
Kevin McNamara (Labour)
Answering body
Northern Ireland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 January 1989
Reference
145 c496-7W;145 c498W
House
House of Commons

If there has been any developments in disciplinary proceedings arising out of the Stalker-Sampson investigation - incl ref to 127 c977-96

Asked by
Ann Widdecombe (Conservative)
Answering body
Northern Ireland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 July 1988
Reference
136 c646-7W;136 c636-8W
House
House of Commons

What representations were received up to 31 May 1986 about implications for morale & efficiency of RUC of inquiries being conducted by Mr John Stalker.

Asked by
Austin Mitchell (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 March 1988
Reference
129 c289W
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord King of Bridgwater (Conservative)
Answering body
Northern Ireland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
25 February 1988
Reference
128 c423-4;128 c425-6
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord King of Bridgwater (Conservative)
Answering body
Northern Ireland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
25 February 1988
Reference
128 c423-4;128 c425-6
House
House of Commons