Skip to main content

1-20 of 25 results for subject:"Tail docking"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The Minister’s speech raised a number of issues and some of us have some brief questions to put to him. I am all for not wasting parliamentary time, but if he is able to briefly answer the questions while we are here, it might speed up the process next time.

Member
Viscount Astor (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2007
Reference
690 c19GC
House
House of Lords

I accept that suggestion, and I wonder whether the Minister and his team will arrange a day for us to get together and sort out the nitty-gritty. That would help the Committee enormously. I do not think there are any objections to the other two sets of regulations, and I...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2007
Reference
690 c19GC
House
House of Lords

I have not heard any voices on the other two sets of regulations.

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2007
Reference
690 c19GC
House
House of Lords

I declare my interest as an honorary associate of both the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons and the British Veterinary Association. I have been, but am not currently, an owner of working dogs. I am speaking only to the Docking of Working Dogs’ Tails (England) Regulations 2007. The Minister cannot...

Member
Countess of Mar (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2007
Reference
690 c16-8GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Countess, Lady Mar, read out quite a number of examples of where she thought there was faulty drafting. I am not sure that I can follow her worry about people getting a friendly policeman to certify a dog, because the regulations state, "““where the dog is presented for...

Member
Duke of Montrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2007
Reference
690 c18-9GC
House
House of Lords

Perhaps we can have an assurance that they will be called separately at the end rather than en bloc.

Member
Countess of Mar (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2007
Reference
690 c14GC
House
House of Lords

No. I will make one speech covering all three regulations. I will obviously be happy to reply to them separately.

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2007
Reference
690 c13GC
House
House of Lords

rose to move, That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Docking of Working Dogs’ Tails (England) Regulations 2007. The noble Lord said: I am pleased to speak on three sets of regulations—the first relates to animal welfare—in one speech. Obviously, I will be...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2007
Reference
690 c13GC
House
House of Lords

We have not had a chance.

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2007
Reference
690 c19GC
House
House of Lords

Having heard what I said, if the noble Lord, Lord Rooker, wishes to withdraw his draft instrument, perhaps he could let us know. If not, we can go on with the debate and decide what do to then.

Member
Countess of Mar (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2007
Reference
690 c18GC
House
House of Lords

But—

Member
Countess of Mar (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2007
Reference
690 c13GC
House
House of Lords

I will give way. I arrive here as a humble servant of the House. I am here only because the Committee wishes it and I will do whatever is required. But my speech groups the regulations together. We can discuss them and I will be more than happy to answer...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2007
Reference
690 c13GC
House
House of Lords

Yes, without a doubt. All I am moving is that the Committee report that it has considered the Docking of Working Dogs’ Tails (England) Regulations, so we should consider that. It is one piece of legislation, but naturally I have one speech to cover all three sets of regulations, which...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2007
Reference
690 c14-6GC
House
House of Lords

That is the point. I do not want to pull one of the sets of regulations. It would be unfair for me to assume that there is unanimity on the other two sets of regulations because they are part of a package, and no one has had the opportunity to...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2007
Reference
690 c19-20GC
House
House of Lords

That was a minor point. The major point is the drafting error.

Member
Countess of Mar (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2007
Reference
690 c19GC
House
House of Lords

The last thing I am in favour of is wasting Parliament’s time. I am in favour of doing everything that needs doing once, and I am not in favour of doing it twice. It is clear to me and my officials that we will have to do the job twice...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2007
Reference
690 c18GC
House
House of Lords

It might help the Committee if I say that I am going to object to the Docking of Working Dogs’ Tails (England) Regulations, and it might be better if we took that one separately.

Member
Countess of Mar (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2007
Reference
690 c13GC
House
House of Lords

I am happy to answer them separately, but this speech is one speech. I cannot tear out a page, although I can find the relevant paragraph, which might be in the middle of a page.

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2007
Reference
690 c13GC
House
House of Lords

Forgive me for seeking clarity. Will the Minister speak to all three regulations together? We assumed that they would be spoken to in the order in which they appear on the Order Paper.

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2007
Reference
690 c13GC
House
House of Lords

Draft SI on Docking of Working Dogs’ Tails (England). Lords debate on a motion to consider. Objection taken. Motion withdrawn. Debated with draft SIs on Mutilations (Permitted Procedures) (England), and Welfare of Animals (Miscellaneous Revocations) (England). Grand Committee held in the Moses Room.

Lead member
Lord Rooker
Answering member
Baroness Byford
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
7 March 2007
Reference
690 c13-20GC
House
House of Lords