Skip to main content

1-20 of 18,354 results for subject:"Tax avoidance"

Type

-
Early day motions (29)
+ Legislation (149) + Acts (24)
-
Public acts (24)
+ Bills (30) + Public bills (30)
-
Government bills (25)
+ Private members' bills (5)
-
Ballot bills (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (4)
+ Delegated legislation (95)
-
Statutory instruments (95)
+ Members' contributions (15,323)
-
Business questions (51)
-
Maiden speeches (31)
-
Oral answers to questions (549)
-
Oral corrections (1)
-
Oral question time interventions (18)
+ Oral questions (607)
-
Prime Minister's questions (80)
-
Topical questions (92)
-
Points of order (3)
-
Proceeding contributions (14,147)
-
Speaker's rulings (1)
+ Parliamentary committees (296) + Committee proceedings (190)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (14)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (1)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (19)
-
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (2)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (115)
-
Second Reading Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (35)
-
Select Committee reports (51)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (16)
-
Select Committee written evidence (46)
+ Parliamentary papers (382)
-
Annual reports (3)
-
Command papers (48)
-
Consultation papers (21)
-
Deposited papers (185)
-
House of Commons papers (117)
-
House of Lords papers (12)
-
Impact assessments (20)
-
Treaties (27)
-
Unprinted papers (7)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (688) + Debates (365)
-
Adjournment debates (22)
-
Backbench debates (10)
-
Budget debates (2)
+ Committee proceedings (190)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (14)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (1)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (19)
-
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (2)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (115)
-
Second Reading Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (35)
-
Debates on select committee reports (14)
-
Emergency debate applications (1)
-
Emergency debates (1)
+ Legislative debates (246)
-
Debates on bills (221)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (25)
+ Monarch's speech debates (2)
-
Queen's speech debates (2)
-
Opposition days (7)
-
Questions for short debate (9)
+ Formal proceedings (13)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (11)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (2)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Statements (300) + Oral statements (39)
-
Ministerial statements (39)
-
Written statements (261)
-
Urgent questions (4)
+ Written corrections (4)
-
Ministerial corrections (4)
+ Parliamentary questions (2,419)
-
Business questions (51)
+ Oral questions (607)
-
Prime Minister's questions (80)
-
Topical questions (92)
-
Urgent questions (4)
-
Written questions (1,757)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Research briefings (34) + Commons Briefing papers (21)
-
Briefing papers on bills (2)
-
Commons Debate packs (6)
+ Lords Briefing packs (1)
-
Lords Briefing packs - Debates (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (6)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (4)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Retrospective tax legislation imposes or increases a tax charge prior to the legislation being introduced. Although this is a controversial practice, retrospective provisions are often introduced to mitigate the risks to the public finances from tax avoidance.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
21 September 2026
Reference
SN04369

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate HM Revenue and Customs has made of tax non-compliance within the hair and barbering sector, including the use of self-employment and rent-a-chair arrangements.

Asked by
Charlie Maynard (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 September 2026
Reference
29032
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many Loan Charge cases remain open with HMRC for the latest date for which figures are available.

Asked by
Michelle Scrogham (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
22295
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee of Public Accounts
Date
3 September 2026
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment she has made of the value for money to the taxpayer of the retrospective Loan Charge.

Asked by
Mims Davies (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 July 2026
Reference
16941
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee of Public Accounts
Date
16 July 2026
Reference
HC 86 2026-27
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, with reference to HM Revenue and Customs' press release entitled Government backs high street with acceleration of cheap import reforms and crackdown on dodgy online sellers, published on 23 June 2026, what discussions she has had with international counterparts on tackling tax avoidance...

Asked by
James McMurdock (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
16827
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, with reference to HM Revenue and Customs' press release entitled Government backs high street with acceleration of cheap import reforms and crackdown on dodgy online sellers, published on 23 June 2026, what assessment she has made of the effectiveness of the current online...

Asked by
James McMurdock (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
16820
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Dan Tomlinson
Department
Treasury
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
SI 2026/821
House
House of Commons

My honourable friend the Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury (Dan Tomlinson) has today made the following Written Ministerial Statement.

The government is today publishing draft legislation ahead of inclusion in the next Finance Bill. This allows for technical consultation on the application of tax policy in legislation. The government is also...

Member
Lord Livermore (Labour)
Department
Treasury
Type
Written statements
Date
13 July 2026
Reference
HLWS225
House
House of Lords

The government is today publishing draft legislation ahead of inclusion in the next Finance Bill. This allows for technical consultation on the application of tax policy in legislation. The government is also publishing some new consultations and a number of responses to consultations on tax policy which have concluded.

The...

Member
Dan Tomlinson (Labour)
Department
Treasury
Type
Written statements
Date
13 July 2026
Reference
HCWS221
House
House of Commons

Lords committee stage sixth day. Clauses 39 to 53 agreed to. Bill reported without amendment.

Lead member
Lord Stockwood
Answering member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe; Lord Altrincham
Department
Treasury
Type
Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Notes
Northern Ireland and Scottish legislative consent sought.
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 cc105-175GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, our amendments in this group concern the future of the bank ring-fencing regime. I will start by setting out clearly the position that we have reached as the Official Opposition. Through our diagnostic work, we have found a consensus that the bank ring-fencing regime is no longer fit...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 cc105-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if I may respond to that, I had thought until recently that what we were debating was a response to the Skeoch commission established by the last Government, but we have new amendments now, it seems—Amendment 160A and the abandonment of clauses—that are really throwing ring-fencing out. I...

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 cc107-9GC
House
House of Lords

In Committee, it is normal to address the amendments and not opposition parties’ policy documents.

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 c109GC
House
House of Lords

The amendment has been put to us at the last minute. The points that it relates to have been there for weeks, indeed months, but I would argue that what has triggered the amendment is the speech by the leader of the Conservative Party and the policy document that underpins...

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 cc109-110GC
House
House of Lords

I rise to speak to the Motion that Clause 40 does not stand part. As I explained at Second Reading, I have no professional knowledge of the banking industry but, because of circumstances, for more than 14 years I have been in this Room talking about the finance industry and...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 cc110-1GC
House
House of Lords

I support Amendment 160A. I want to start by briefly addressing a couple of issues raised by the noble Lord, Lord Pitt-Watson. Most importantly, I want briefly to quote the conclusions of the Skeoch report. The panel judges that the ring-fence

“is worth retaining at present”

but adds a number of considerations:

“The...

Member
Lord Massey of Hampstead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 c111GC
House
House of Lords

I did indeed talk to senior members of the Skeoch commission before writing my speech, and what I said is completely consistent with the conclusions of the Skeoch commission, which was set up by the previous Conservative Government, as I said.

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 c112GC
House
House of Lords

I am just reading the conclusions from the report, my Lords. They make it very clear that the continuation of ring-fencing made sense at the time the report was written, but the commission clearly envisaged that it might not be needed over the passage of time. I also remind noble...

Member
Lord Massey of Hampstead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 c112GC
House
House of Lords