Skip to main content

1-20 of 311 results for subject:"Theatre nuclear weapons"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of implications for (a) his policies and (b) the stationing of intermediate range nuclear warheads in Europe of the reactivation of the 56th Artillery Command by the US army.

Asked by
Kenny MacAskill (Alba Party)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 February 2022
Reference
114953
House
House of Commons

In August 2019 the United States formally withdrew from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
17 September 2019
Reference
CBP-8634

To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Statement on the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty by Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon on 5 February (HL Deb, cols 1495–9), what assessment they have made of whether (1) Germany, (2) Hungary, (3) Poland, (4) Bulgaria, (5) Slovakia, and (6) the Czech Republic have destroyed or...

Asked by
Viscount Waverley (Crossbench)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 February 2019
Reference
HL13546
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Statement on the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty by Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon on 5 February (HL Deb, cols 1495–9), what is their response to the government of Russia's non-compliance with that Treaty; and what assessment they have made of reports of INF...

Asked by
Viscount Waverley (Crossbench)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 February 2019
Reference
HL13545
House
House of Lords

Lords statement on the intermediate-range nuclear forces treaty.

Lead member
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon
Department
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
5 February 2019
Reference
795 cc1495-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, with the leave of the House, I shall repeat in the form of a Statement the Answer given to an Urgent Question in the other place on the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty. The Statement is as follows:

“When I had the opportunity to respond on this issue in the...

Member
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2019
Reference
795 cc1495-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for repeating that response to the Urgent Question. As he repeated, and as Mark Field said yesterday in the other place, the treaty’s six-month withdrawal process offers Russia a final opportunity to return to compliance.

Last October, we had a similar Answer repeated in this...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2019
Reference
795 cc1496-7
House
House of Lords

Taking the noble Lord’s last question first, he will know that the INF treaty is a bilateral treaty between the United States and the Soviet Union, as it then was, although he raised an important point about nuclear weapons more generally. I assure him that the United Kingdom continues to...

Member
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2019
Reference
795 c1497
House
House of Lords

Will the Minister join me in putting aside questions of blame and responsibility, and consider the nature of nuclear arms control? It can reasonably be said that its architecture is crumbling before our eyes. It is not just the INF treaty; it is the Iran nuclear treaty, the prospects for...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2019
Reference
795 c1497
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is right to raise concerns. The United Kingdom and Her Majesty’s Government have raised these concerns directly. When it came to the Iran nuclear deal, notwithstanding the

United States’ decision, we were firm and strengthened our co-operation with our European allies to ensure that that treaty remains...

Member
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2019
Reference
795 cc1497-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend has pointed out that reservations about this treaty were expressed by the Obama presidency, long before President Trump was elected. Surely if one side breaks a treaty, it is time to abandon it altogether. On the point that the noble Lord, Lord Collins, made about...

Member
Lord Hamilton of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2019
Reference
795 c1498
House
House of Lords

My noble friend speaks with great insight on these matters and I agree with him. Since October, there has been some hope of notice being given. The United States has shown that it acted in line with its obligations—it continued to abide by the treaty—and it has to be made...

Member
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2019
Reference
795 c1498
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Europe has been the greatest beneficiary of this treaty since 1987. With the suspension of compliance by both the United States and Russia, Europe is now much less secure, and it will continue to be while that compliance is suspended. On the date in December when the United...

Member
Lord Browne of Ladyton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2019
Reference
795 cc1498-9
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord raises an important point about NATO’s previous statement. I specifically draw his attention to NATO’s statement of 1 February 2019 on this very issue. It said:

“NATO continues to closely review the security implication of Russian intermediate-range missiles and will continue to take steps necessary to ensure the...

Member
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2019
Reference
795 c1499
House
House of Lords

Urgent question on the intermediate-range nuclear forces treaty.

Lead member
Fabian Hamilton
Answering member
Mark Field
Department
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Urgent questions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
654 cc45-57
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs to make a statement on the intermediate-range nuclear forces treaty.

Member
Fabian Hamilton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
654 c45
House
House of Commons

As if to prove that lightning does sometimes strike twice, even in this unnatural world of politics, I am here to address this issue again, as I was on 25 October, deputising for my right hon. Friend the Minister for Europe and the Americas, who is once more gallivanting globally....

Member
Mark Field (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
654 cc45-6
House
House of Commons

Thank you for granting this urgent question, Mr Speaker, and I thank the Minister for his statement.

During the weekend, one of the main pillars of nuclear weapons treaties was suspended when first the United States and then Russia withdrew from the intermediate-range nuclear forces treaty. As the Minister said, it...

Member
Fabian Hamilton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
654 cc46-7
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his comments. I will touch on two aspects of what he said. The first is what losing the INF treaty means for extending New START, which is a bilateral treaty between the US and Russia that expires in 2021. We were pleased to see...

Member
Mark Field (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
654 c47
House
House of Commons

In his memoirs, Mr Gorbachev makes it absolutely clear that the reason he signed the treaty was that NATO deployed cruise and, especially, Pershing II missiles, which he greatly feared. Given that this was the most successful example in history of multinational disarmament, as

opposed to one-sided gestures, it would...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
654 c47
House
House of Commons