Skip to main content

1-20 of 68 results for subject:"Total UK"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The economy in northern Lincolnshire has had much good news in recent weeks, but a bit of a damper was put on that this morning by the announcement from Lindsey oil refinery that there will be 180 redundancies. That follows 90 redundancies announced last week by Cristal Global. Will the Minister assure me that everything possible will be done by his Department and Government agencies to support the workers at this difficult time?

Asked by
Martin Vickers (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
12 February 2015
Reference
592 c948
House
House of Commons

Absolutely. I met Total yesterday and it told me of its planned announcement today. We are working with the company to ensure that if any redundancies occur, those made redundant are supported. They will often be people with skills that are in short supply across the nation, and I look forward to going to my hon. Friend’s constituency to discuss this with him and to working with him.

Answered by
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
12 February 2015
Reference
592 c948
House
House of Commons

As the hon. Member for Cleethorpes (Martin Vickers) pointed out, there is an announcement today about restructuring by Total of its facility at Lindsey oil refinery. In addition there is uncertainty about the future of Tata Steel Long Products in Scunthorpe. Will the Government ensure that the necessary support is given to manufacturing industry in north Lincolnshire, so that it has a strong and prosperous future?

Asked by
Nicholas Dakin (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
12 February 2015
Reference
592 c949
House
House of Commons

Absolutely we will. I understand that the changes announced today by Total are set to take place over a number of years, so there will be time to ensure that we get the systems in place to support people who are affected, whether they stay within Total or are looking for jobs elsewhere or are seeking early retirement. We will do all we can to help.

Answered by
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
12 February 2015
Reference
592 c949
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Energy and Climate Change Committee
Date
14 December 2010
Reference
HC 450 2010-11
House
House of Commons

I very much appreciate the hon. Gentleman raising this point on behalf of his constituents, and I am sure that the whole House would want to express our condolences to the family and friends of Robert Greenacre, who sadly lost his life in the incident. As the hon. Gentleman said,...

Member
David Heath (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2010
Reference
512 c1012
House
House of Commons

The Deputy Leader of the House may have heard or read reports of an incident on Tuesday at the Lindsey oil refinery in my constituency. Sadly, there was a fatality and a number of injuries, and I am sure that the whole House would want to send our condolences in...

Member
Martin Vickers (Conservative)
Type
Business questions
Date
1 July 2010
Reference
512 c1012
House
House of Commons

My Lords, my noble friend is right. You cannot advertise a job vacancy and say only people of one nationality need apply, or indeed one race, or one sex.

Member
Lord Mandelson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c480
House
House of Lords

Lords statement on the current industrial action at the Lindsey oil refinery and elsewhere in the country.

Lead member
Lord Mandelson
Department
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c472-80
House
House of Lords

Statement on industrail action at the Lindsey refinery and elsewher.

Lead member
Pat McFadden
Department
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
487 c579-89
House
House of Commons

Yes, my Lords, they are.

Member
Lord Mandelson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c480
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the Minister therefore mean that the Italian workers at this refinery are being the paid the same wages as the British ones?

Member
Lord Hamilton of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c480
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the point is they are not paying the national minimum wage in this case. They are paying the same rates as those that have been collectively bargained to benefit other workers at the refinery. As a general observation, of course we can establish this; were there a suspicion...

Member
Lord Mandelson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c480
House
House of Lords

My Lords, is the national minimum wage that applies that of the UK or that of the subcontractor? If it is the subcontractor’s, or in either case, what powers do we have to check that it really is paying that national minimum wage, because we presumably do not see the...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c480
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare that I am a member of Unite. I completely agree with my noble friend that we must all be temperate in what we say, particularly as negotiations continue. However, I understood him to say that one of the contentious points was that British workers were not...

Member
Lord Hoyle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c479
House
House of Lords

My Lords, is it not rather mischievous to make capital out of the phrase ““British jobs for British workers””? Surely it would have been far more dangerous and controversial if he had said ““British workers for British jobs””, but the Prime Minister never said that.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c479
House
House of Lords

My Lords, so much so is it the case that British workers were able to apply for these jobs that the subcontractor undertaking this work, prior to the letting of this contract to the Italian firm, was another subcontractor which, for whatever reason—I am not ascribing fault to either side—was...

Member
Lord Mandelson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c479
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend. We must all expect to have our phrases and soundbites misused from time to time, and taken up like a stick with which to beat us. Such are the trials of political life.

Member
Lord Mandelson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c479
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the noble Lord agree that the slogan ““British jobs for British workers”” is much older than the National Front or the BNP? It is a clarion call that has reverberated around this House on many occasions over the past 200 or 250 years, and, indeed, has as...

Member
Lord Elystan-Morgan (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c480
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am unable to provide the noble Lord, Lord Elystan-Morgan, with the figures that he asks for but I am happy to make inquiries of my officials. He is right to say that such an aspiration is a worthy clarion call and a noble policy objective, as long...

Member
Lord Mandelson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c480
House
House of Lords