Skip to main content

1-20 of 2,106 results for subject:"Trade marks"

Type

-
Early day motions (3)
+ Legislation (109) + Acts (5)
-
Public acts (5)
+ Bills (9) + Public bills (9)
-
Government bills (5)
+ Private members' bills (4)
-
Ballot bills (2)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (95)
-
Statutory instruments (95)
+ Members' contributions (1,651)
-
Maiden speeches (1)
-
Oral answers to questions (19)
+ Oral questions (19)
-
Prime Minister's questions (3)
-
Proceeding contributions (1,613)
+ Parliamentary committees (50) + Committee proceedings (45)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (11)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (11)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (3)
-
Second Reading Committee proceedings (2)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (14)
-
Select Committee reports (4)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (1)
-
Select Committee written evidence (3)
+ Parliamentary papers (99)
-
Command papers (9)
-
Consultation papers (12)
-
Deposited papers (43)
-
House of Commons papers (25)
-
House of Lords papers (1)
-
Impact assessments (25)
-
Proposed negative statutory instruments (2)
-
Treaties (7)
-
Unprinted command papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (100) + Debates (88)
-
Adjournment debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (45)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (11)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (11)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (3)
-
Second Reading Committee proceedings (2)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (14)
+ Legislative debates (71)
-
Debates on bills (45)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (26)
+ Monarch's speech debates (1)
-
Queen's speech debates (1)
-
Questions for short debate (1)
+ Statements (12)
-
Written statements (12)
+ Parliamentary questions (172) + Oral questions (19)
-
Prime Minister's questions (3)
-
Written questions (153)
+ Research briefings (5) + Commons Briefing papers (4)
-
Briefing papers on bills (1)
+ Lords In Focus (1)
-
Lords In Focus - Bills (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Laid by
Kanishka Narayan
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Statutory instruments
Notes
Revokes SI 2020/644
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
SI 2026/183
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they discussed the impact of the European Union's "Made in Europe" plans on UK competitiveness at the UK–EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement Partnership Council meeting on 2 February.

Asked by
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
HL14486
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, whether he plans to take steps to support small businesses whose intellectual property and trademarks are being challenged by large corporate firms; and to if he will make an assessment of whether legal fees for small businesses subjected to...

Asked by
James Naish (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 February 2025
Reference
31188
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Peter Kyle
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
31 October 2024
Reference
SI 2024/1077
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

Lords report stage. Amendment 4 agreed to. Amendment 5 disagreed to on division (102 to 212). Bill, as amended, ordered to be printed (HL Bill 40).

Lead member
Lord Johnson of Lainston
Answering member
Lord McNicol of West Kilbride; Lord Leong
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Debates on bills
Notes
Scottish, Welsh and Northern Ireland legislative consent sought.
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 cc320-379
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Lansley

1: Clause 3, page 2, line 8, leave out “and (b)” and insert “or

(b) funded by an international organisation of which the United Kingdom is a member to a lesser extent, and”

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 c320
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this group and the next group of amendments follow debates that took place in Committee, and I am very grateful for the Minister’s response then and for his subsequent letters that have further amplified the discussion about this. I apologise for delaying the House—not for very long, I...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 c321
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I begin by declaring my interests, which are very clearly listed on the Lords’ register. I have interests in limited companies and companies that are active in CPTPP countries, but I do not believe there is any conflict.

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 c321
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we cannot really hear the Minister; could he raise his voice?

Member
Baroness Kennedy of the Shaws (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 c322
House
House of Lords

Yes, my apologies. Before I begin, I would like to declare my interests, which are very clearly listed on the Lords’ register. I have interests in limited companies and other companies active in CPTPP countries, but I do not believe there is any conflict of interest in this process today.

I...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 cc322-4
House
House of Lords

I am most grateful to my noble friend. He explained very well why the Government want to clarify this in this way. I hope he is right, and it is wholly consistent with CPTPP, although it is not precisely the same wording—it adds additional clarification. My noble friend made typically...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 c323
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Lansley

3: Clause 4, page 3, line 13, leave out “established by use” and insert “in use prior to that date”

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 c323
House
House of Lords

I hope that I will be equally quick on this amendment, as there are points of more substance and principle to be debated later.

We discussed Amendment 3 in Committee. Essentially, it relates to a set of circumstances in which trademarks and GIs—geographical indications—may come into conflict and the circumstances in...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 c325
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I cannot claim any expertise in trademarks or their registration, but I think there is force in the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Lansley. The expression “established by use” is slightly vague, whereas the words that the noble Lord would substitute—of it being actively “in use...

Member
Lord Hope of Craighead (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 c325
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Lansley, is right: the Trade Marks Act 1994 at no point uses the words “established by use”. However, the Act makes specific provision for registered trademarks, whereas those established by use—as the noble Lord said—would presumably be unregistered and, therefore, subject to common law...

Member
Lord McNicol of West Kilbride (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 cc325-6
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I might add something before the Minister speaks. Having listened with interest to my noble and learned friend Lord Hope, and with my limited intellectual property knowledge, I am concerned about the use of the words “established by use”. As far as I know, they do not appear elsewhere...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 c326
House
House of Lords

As always, I thank my noble friend Lord Lansley and all contributors to the debate on this amendment. It is very relevant, in my view; however, I am comfortable keeping the words “established by use” in the Bill as printed, rather than using

“in use prior to that date”.

My reason is...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 cc326-7
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to all who took part in this very short debate, and in particular to the noble and learned Lord, Lord Hope, and the noble and learned Baroness, Lady Butler-Sloss, for their contributions on the legal aspects.

Unfortunately, I have not had an opportunity to look at the reference...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 cc327-8
House
House of Lords

Before the noble Lord sits down, I am unaccustomed to supporting the Minister in these areas, as he and the House are aware, but, having glanced at legislation.gov.uk, regulation 2019/787, regarding the relationship between trademarks and geographical indicators, does indeed have the definition of “established by use”. I am not...

Member
Lord Purvis of Tweed (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 c328
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord, and it may indeed satisfy me as long as we do not abolish it any time soon. With all those helpful comments from noble Lords, I beg leave to withdraw Amendment 3.

Amendment 3 withdrawn.

Amendment 4

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 c328
House
House of Lords