1-20 of 5,060 results for subject:"Train operating companies"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.367 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.012 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Train operating companies"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Train operating companies" OR subject_t:TOCs OR subject_t:"Train operating units" OR subject_ses:93315
Type
House
Session
More
Year
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask His Majesty's Government what is the tax cost of train operators using red diesel instead of paying full fuel tax.
To ask His Majesty's Government what is the tax cost of train operators using red diesel instead of paying full fuel tax.
Qualifying locomotives for passenger and freight trains, and rail maintenance vehicles can use red diesel for propulsion. The Treasury does not hold information on the cost of rebated fuel used specifically by train operators.
To assist the Noble Lord, I can point to the most relevant published statistics available. HMRC’s non-structural tax reliefs publication sets out the overall estimated Exchequer cost of the rebate for red diesel (and kerosene used as fuel in an engine), while DESNZ’s Digest of UK Energy Statistics provides data on petroleum products consumed by the rail sector.
Although these publications do not provide a separate official estimate for train operators, they provide the best available published information on the overall cost of the relief and the scale of rail-sector fuel use.
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill on 19 June (HL718), what was the total value of Schedule 8 compensation payments made by Network Rail to Train Operating Companies resulting from rail trespass incidents in each of the last 30 years.
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill on 19 June (HL718), what was the total value of Schedule 8 compensation payments made by Network Rail to Train Operating Companies resulting from rail trespass incidents in each of the last 30 years.
Network Rail holds data on the estimated Schedule 8 costs arising from rail trespass incidents from 1 April 2014 onwards. The total value of the payments during this time can be found in the following table:
Volume of trespass related incidents and estimated costs of associated delays, annual, Great Britain, 2014/15 to 2025/26
Financial year | Volume of incidents1,2,4 | Costs3,5 (£million, current prices) | Costs (£million, 2025/26 prices) | Average cost per incident |
2014/15 | 6,415 | 33.6 | 46.7 | £ 7,300 |
2015/16 | 7,488 | 34.4 | 47.5 | £ 6,300 |
2016/17 | 8,336 | 44.0 | 59.7 | £ 7,200 |
2017/18 | 9,576 | 54.1 | 72.3 | £ 7,500 |
2018/19 | 9,798 | 61.2 | 80.2 | £ 8,200 |
2019/20 | 10,127 | 66.6 | 85.2 | £ 8,400 |
2020/21 | 9,410 | 35.7 | 43.5 | £ 4,600 |
2021/22 | 11,559 | 50.2 | 60.8 | £ 5,300 |
2022/23 | 11,583 | 64.9 | 74.4 | £ 6,400 |
2023/24 | 12,726 | 84.0 | 90.5 | £ 7,100 |
2024/25 | 13,611 | 86.5 | 89.8 | £ 6,600 |
2025/26 | 13,921 | 85.5 | 85.5 | £ 6,100 |
Notes:
1. Incidents are delay causing incidents attributed to XA,VA reason codes
2. An incident can appear in more than one rail period if delay was suffered in more than one period
3. Costs are an internal Network Rail estimate of the long-term revenue loss due to those incidents (based on the economics behind the Schedule 8 performance regime)
Source: Network Rail
4. Delay & Cancellation metric dashboard
5. Process for Performance Improvement (PfPI) Costs are from the Performance System database Business Objects attribution universe
To ask His Majesty's Government what was the total capital investment of Network Rail in the train operating companies in the financial year 2024–25.
To ask His Majesty's Government what was the total capital investment of Network Rail in the train operating companies in the financial year 2024–25.
The Office of Rail and Road sets out Network Rail's expenditure for the financial year 2024-25. Network Rail does not invest capital in train operating companies.
To ask His Majesty's Government what is the annual tax cost of exempting rail operators from the climate change levy on their purchase of electricity.
To ask His Majesty's Government what is the annual tax cost of exempting rail operators from the climate change levy on their purchase of electricity.
Energy supplies used in certain forms of transport are exempt from the main rate of Climate Change Levy (CCL). This includes electricity used to electrify rail lines, light a railway carriage transporting passengers and light the cab interior of a freight train transporting goods.
Information on the estimated cost of tax reliefs, including CCL exemptions, is published on GOV.UK and can be found in the annual statistics on tax reliefs. However, it is not possible to provide the annual tax cost of exempting rail operators from CCL, as HMRC does not collect this information.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what categories of management information are recorded locally by state-owned Train Operating Companies in relation to service cancellations.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what categories of management information are recorded locally by state-owned Train Operating Companies in relation to service cancellations.
The Department does not hold centrally a list of the categories of management information recorded locally by train operating companies. Decisions on locally recorded management information are an operational matter for each operator.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, for each of the following operators: (a) LNER, (b) Southeastern, (c) TransPennine Express, (d) South Western Railway, (e) c2c, (f) Greater Anglia, (g) West Midlands Trains and (h) Greater Thameslink Railway, how many scheduled passenger services were short-formed in the 18-month period...
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, for each of the following operators: (a) LNER, (b) Southeastern, (c) TransPennine Express, (d) South Western Railway, (e) c2c, (f) Greater Anglia, (g) West Midlands Trains and (h) Greater Thameslink Railway, how many scheduled passenger services were short-formed in the 18-month period...
Below is the available data for the number of short - formed services and the percentage based on the regime data for each operator. Please note that the percentages are not comparable and do not represent the total number of services for each operator.
London North Eastern Railway (November 2024 – March 2026) | Number of Short Formed Services | Percentage of Regime Services |
Period 2509 | 7 | 0.18% |
Period 2510 | 1 | 0.03% |
Period 2511 | 4 | 0.10% |
Period 2512 | 2 | 0.05% |
Period 2513 | 5 | 0.10% |
Period 2601 | 4 | 0.09% |
Period 2602 | 1 | 0.02% |
Period 2603 | 3 | 0.07% |
Period 2604 | 8 | 0.18% |
Period 2605 | 6 | 0.07% |
Period 2606 | 3 | 0.13% |
Period 2607 | 0 | 0.00% |
Period 2608 | 1 | 0.02% |
Period 2609 | 4 | 0.09% |
Period 2610 | 6 | 0.14% |
Period 2611 | 18 | 0.37% |
Period 2612 | 8 | 0.17% |
Period 2613 | 11 | 0.20% |
Period 2701 | 13 | 0.22% |
Period 2702 | 33 | 0.63% |
LNER monitored services measured against All Weekday, Saturday and Sunday services.
South Eastern Trains (November 2024 – March 2026) | Number of Short Formed Services | Percentage of Regime Services |
Period 2509 | 50 | 0.79% |
Period 2510 | 37 | 0.90% |
Period 2511 | 61 | 0.92% |
Period 2512 | 52 | 0.77% |
Period 2513 | 59 | 0.84% |
Period 2601 | 87 | 1.52% |
Period 2602 | 65 | 1.04% |
Period 2603 | 71 | 1.11% |
Period 2604 | 95 | 1.44% |
Period 2605 | 111 | 1.67% |
Period 2606 | 61 | 0.97% |
Period 2607 | 99 | 1.47% |
Period 2608 | 93 | 1.39% |
Period2609 | 114 | 1.70% |
Period 2610 | 77 | 1.90% |
Period 2611 | 94 | 1.39% |
Period 2612 | 70 | 1.03% |
Period 2613 | 85 | 1.15% |
Period 2701 | 93 | 1.31% |
Period 2702 | 71 | 1.19% |
SET monitored services measured as Peak services arriving in the morning Peak or departure in the evening peak at London Bridge, London Victoria, London St. Pancras International or London Blackfriars.
Trans Pennine Trains (November 2024 – March 2026) | Number of Short Formed Services | Percentage of Regime Services |
Period 2509 | 37 | 0.47% |
Period 2510 | 66 | 0.95% |
Period 2511 | 67 | 0.79% |
Period 2512 | 55 | 0.65% |
Period 2513 | 14 | 0.16% |
Period 2601 | 59 | 0.72% |
Period 2602 | 43 | 0.50% |
Period 2603 | 38 | 0.44% |
Period 2604 | 38 | 0.47% |
Period 2605 | 56 | 0.64% |
Period 2606 | 40 | 0.47% |
Period 2607 | 69 | 0.83% |
Period 2608 | 130 | 1.64% |
Period 2609 | 125 | 1.64% |
Period 2610 | 89 | 1.14% |
Period 2611 | 96 | 1.19% |
Period 2612 | 43 | 0.50% |
Period 2613 | 29 | 0.31% |
Period 2701 | 52 | 0.53% |
Period 2702 | 61 | 0.66% |
TPT monitored services measured against Weekday, Saturday and Sunday services at Manchester Stations, and Leeds.
South Western Railways (November 2024 – March 2026) | Number of Short Formed Services | Percentage of Regime Services |
Period 2509 | 593 | 1.47% |
Period 2510 | 356 | 0.96% |
Period 2511 | 267 | 0.65% |
Period 2512 | 479 | 1.13% |
Period 2513 | 400 | 0.88% |
Period 2601 – Start of Public Ownership | 445 | 1.15% |
Period 2602 | 677 | 1.60% |
Period 2603 | 1,026 | 2.51% |
Period 2604 | 848 | 2.08% |
Period 2605 | 697 | 1.72% |
Period 2606 | 576 | 1.42% |
Period 2607 | 320 | 0.76% |
Period 2608 | 329 | 0.80% |
Period 2609 | 447 | 1.08% |
Period 2610 | 471 | 1.30% |
Period 2611 | 337 | 0.82% |
Period 2612 | 331 | 0.80% |
Period 2613 | 314 | 0.69% |
Period 2701 | 196 | 0.40% |
Period 2702 | 299 | 0.76% |
SWR monitored services measured against All Weekday, Saturday and Sunday services.
c2c (November 2024 – March 2026) | Number of Short Formed Services | Percentage of Regime Services |
Period 2509 | 4 | 0.23% |
Period 2510 | 0 | 0.00% |
Period 2511 | 2 | 0.12% |
Period 2512 | 3 | 0.17% |
Period 2513 | 2 | 0.11% |
Period 2601 | 35 | 2.28% |
Period 2602 | 31 | 1.87% |
Period 2603 | 9 | 0.54% |
Period 2604 | 3 | 0.17% |
Period 2605 – Start of Public Ownership | 4 | 0.23% |
Period 2606 | 7 | 0.42% |
Period 2607 | 5 | 0.29% |
Period 2608 | 6 | 0.35% |
Period2609 | 0 | 0.00% |
Period 2610 | 2 | 0.15% |
Period 2611 | 3 | 0.17% |
Period 2612 | 1 | 0.06% |
Period 2613 | 2 | 0.11% |
Period 2701 | 5 | 0.27% |
Period 2702 | 1 | 0.06% |
c2c monitored services measured against Monday – Friday Peak Services.
Greater Anglia | Number of Short Formed Services | Percentage of Regime Services |
Period 2509 | 8 | 0.26% |
Period 2510 | 9 | 0.41% |
Period 2511 | 14 | 0.46% |
Period 2512 | 3 | 0.08% |
Period 2513 | 10 | 0.31% |
Period 2601 | 1 | 0.04% |
Period 2602 | 3 | 0.10% |
Period 2603 | 5 | 0.17% |
Period 2604 | 2 | 0.06% |
Period 2605 | 2 | 0.06% |
Period 2606 | 1 | 0.03% |
Period 2607 | 5 | 0.16% |
Period 2608 – Start of Public Ownership | 6 | 0.19% |
Period 2609 | 0 | 0.00% |
Period 2610 |
|
|
Period 2611 |
|
|
Period 2612 |
|
|
Period 2613 |
|
|
Period 2701 |
|
|
Period 2702 |
|
|
Numbers for Period 2610 – Period 2702 is not currently available due to a technical issue; I will write to the Hon. Member as soon as possible with updated information and place a copy of the letter in the Libraries of the House.
GA monitored services measured against Morning Peak Services and Evening Peak Services.
West Midlands Trains (November 2024 – March 2026) | Number of Short Formed Services | Percentage of Regime Services |
Period 2509 | 449 | 1.50% |
Period 2510 | 400 | 1.48% |
Period 2511 | 293 | 0.93% |
Period 2512 | 308 | 0.97% |
Period 2513 | 317 | 0.95% |
Period 2601 | 363 | 1.24% |
Period 2602 | 277 | 0.88% |
Period 2603 | 308 | 0.98% |
Period 2604 | 307 | 0.99% |
Period 2605 | 276 | 0.89% |
Period 2606 | 294 | 0.94% |
Period 2607 | 189 | 0.60% |
Period 2608 | 209 | 0.67% |
Period 2609 | 269 | 0.87% |
Period 2610 | 307 | 1.10% |
Period 2611 | 386 | 1.25% |
Period 2612 – Start of Public Ownership | 154 | 0.49% |
Period 2613 | 147 | 0.43% |
Period 2701 | 171 | 0.47% |
Period 2702 | 173 | 0.57% |
WMT monitored services measured as LNRBU Passenger Services and WMRBU
Passenger Services that are a Weekday, Saturday
and Sunday service.
Greater Thameslink Railway (Start of Public Ownership - June 2026) | Number of Short Formed Services | Percentage of Regime Services |
Period 2509 | 52 | 0.48% |
Period 2510 | 31 | 0.35% |
Period 2511 | 105 | 0.92% |
Period 2512 | 79 | 0.70% |
Period 2513 | 60 | 0.50% |
Period 2601 | 41 | 0.42% |
Period 2602 | 108 | 0.99% |
Period 2603 | 82 | 0.75% |
Period 2604 | 78 | 0.68% |
Period 2605 | 69 | 0.61% |
Period 2606 | 62 | 0.59% |
Period 2607 | 73 | 0.64% |
Period 2608 | 72 | 0.63% |
Period 2609 | 102 | 0.89% |
Period 2610 | 47 | 0.54% |
Period 2611 | 75 | 0.64% |
Period 2612 | 66 | 0.57% |
Period 2613 | 80 | 0.62% |
Period 2701 | 64 | 0.52% |
Period 2702 | 74 | 0.71% |
GTR monitored services measured against services arriving in the Morning Peak or departing in the Evening Peak from Kensington (Olympia), London Blackfriars, London Bridge, London Kings Cross, London St Pancras international, London Victoria and Moorgate, as well as Brighton in the London Road and Hove directions.
N.B. Passenger services are only counted once for the purposes of Short Formations.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 17 June to Question 9171, whether the £65.5 million difference between the forecast and actual reduction in Support for Passenger Rail Services in 2025-26 was attributable to (a) lower than forecast revenue, (b) higher than forecast costs,...
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 17 June to Question 9171, whether the £65.5 million difference between the forecast and actual reduction in Support for Passenger Rail Services in 2025-26 was attributable to (a) lower than forecast revenue, (b) higher than forecast costs,...
The department does not intend to publish operator-level comparisons of subsidy requirement against forecast ahead of the publication of Train Operating Companies’ final audited accounts and financial statements. This is because the underlying revenue and cost information at TOC level is commercially sensitive, and it would not be appropriate for the Department to disclose this information in advance of publication by the operators themselves.
Information on TOC financial performance is subsequently made available through the operators’ own published accounts and through the Office of Rail and Road’s annual financial statistical publications, which are published after the close of the relevant financial year.
(https://dataportal.orr.gov.uk/statistics/finance/rail-industry-finance/table-7226-franchised-passen…
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 17 June to Question 9171, what the subsidy requirement was for each train operating company in 2025-26 compared with the forecast used in the Department's Main Estimate.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 17 June to Question 9171, what the subsidy requirement was for each train operating company in 2025-26 compared with the forecast used in the Department's Main Estimate.
The department does not intend to publish operator-level comparisons of subsidy requirement against forecast ahead of the publication of Train Operating Companies’ final audited accounts and financial statements. This is because the underlying revenue and cost information at TOC level is commercially sensitive, and it would not be appropriate for the Department to disclose this information in advance of publication by the operators themselves.
Information on TOC financial performance is subsequently made available through the operators’ own published accounts and through the Office of Rail and Road’s annual financial statistical publications, which are published after the close of the relevant financial year.
(https://dataportal.orr.gov.uk/statistics/finance/rail-industry-finance/table-7226-franchised-passen…
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 17 June to Question 9171, what passenger revenue assumptions underpinned the forecast £464.6 million reduction in Support for Passenger Rail Services in 2025-26; and what the actual passenger revenue outturn was.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 17 June to Question 9171, what passenger revenue assumptions underpinned the forecast £464.6 million reduction in Support for Passenger Rail Services in 2025-26; and what the actual passenger revenue outturn was.
The £464.6m reduction to 2025-26 Estimates was on the assumption of an increase in revenue compared to 2024/25. Revenue outturn was lower than the 2025/26 forecast due to a number of factors, including changing consumer behaviour, with passengers taking more advantage of good value advance fares and increased use of railcards.
To ask His Majesty's Government what was the total cost of overtime and rest-day working payments made to cover staff sickness in each state-owned Train Operating Company, in each month since January 2024.
To ask His Majesty's Government what was the total cost of overtime and rest-day working payments made to cover staff sickness in each state-owned Train Operating Company, in each month since January 2024.
The Department does not hold this information. Covering staff sickness is an operational matter for the train operating companies.
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill on 2 June (HL335), what was the total value of Schedule 8 compensation payments made by Network Rail to Train Operating Companies resulting from rail trespass incidents in (1) 2024, (2) 2025, and (3)...
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill on 2 June (HL335), what was the total value of Schedule 8 compensation payments made by Network Rail to Train Operating Companies resulting from rail trespass incidents in (1) 2024, (2) 2025, and (3)...
The Network Rail / British Transport Police’s National Disruption Fusion Unit can supply Schedule 8 (delay report) costs for external (XA) trespass for the following:
The combined figure is £218,374,921.
The annual (by financial year) breakdown is as follows:
2023/24 | £ 71,856,452 |
2024/25 | £ 73,165,870 |
2025/26 | £ 73,352,599 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if she will set out the key performance indicators her Department uses to assess changes in the level of performance for train operators following nationalisation; and whether she has set targets for improvement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if she will set out the key performance indicators her Department uses to assess changes in the level of performance for train operators following nationalisation; and whether she has set targets for improvement.
Working with the industry, the new Services Agreements for public sector operators consolidate the myriad of performance measures so that both track and train can focus on the same measures of success. The most important indicators are train cancellations and punctuality (as measured by how many trains arrive within three minutes of schedule). Targets are negotiated each year as part of the Annual Business Planning process with each operator, taking into account the particular circumstances foreseen in the year ahead. In addition, there are a number of measures and key performance indicators covering customer, operations and finance.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, with reference to her Department's Main Estimate 2025-26, whether the forecast £464.6 million reduction in net subsidy to Train Operating Companies relative to 2024-25 will be achieved; and what contingency plans are in place should passenger revenue fall below forecast levels.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, with reference to her Department's Main Estimate 2025-26, whether the forecast £464.6 million reduction in net subsidy to Train Operating Companies relative to 2024-25 will be achieved; and what contingency plans are in place should passenger revenue fall below forecast levels.
The 2025-26 final outturn for Support for Passenger Rail Services was £2,159.2 million. This represented an actual reduction of £399.1 million, which is 86 per cent of the forecast £464.6 million reduction. The outturn was fully funded from within the Department’s overall funding limits.
The rail passenger service subsidy funding is set on a net basis, including both costs and revenue. Changes are addressed through regular forecasting and business planning processes. Mitigations to address any overall subsidy pressure may include a range of options to drive revenue and manage costs, depending on the overall train operator’s portfolio position, the specific circumstances at the time, and the long-term implications and the size of the challenge.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what was the average number of sickness absence days per full-time equivalent (FTE) employee for each state-owned Train Operating Company in 2024 and 2025.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what was the average number of sickness absence days per full-time equivalent (FTE) employee for each state-owned Train Operating Company in 2024 and 2025.
The Department does not hold the calculated figures requested.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many (a) Notices to Improve and (b) written instructions her Department issued to train operating companies for which the Department is the operator in relation to (i) service performance and (ii) financial control in January 2026 and each subsequent month.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many (a) Notices to Improve and (b) written instructions her Department issued to train operating companies for which the Department is the operator in relation to (i) service performance and (ii) financial control in January 2026 and each subsequent month.
The Department has not issued any Notices to Improve on any of the DfT Operator train operating companies in January 2026 and in each subsequent month because none have been in breach of their formal contractual terms.
The DfT regularly engages with all operators on service performance and financial management, aligned with this Government's priorities on improving performance and reducing subsidy.
To ask His Majesty's Government how many working days were lost to sickness per train operating company in Government ownership, in each month since January 2024.
To ask His Majesty's Government how many working days were lost to sickness per train operating company in Government ownership, in each month since January 2024.
Each train operating company currently records this information in a different way – some by days lost and some by percentage absence rate. The figures below have been collated by DFT Operator. Figures cover periods in public ownership only.
Table 1:
Absences by days lost, presented by Rail Period
(Northern, TransPennine Trains, South Western Railway)
| NORTHERN | TPT | SWR |
P11 2023 (broadly Jan 24) | 7496 | 1881 |
|
P12 2023 (Feb 24) | 7759 | 1785 |
|
P13 2023 (Mar 24) | 7532 | 1548 |
|
P1 2024 (Apr 24) | 7291 | 1597 |
|
P2 2024 (Apr / May 24) | 7569 | 1724 |
|
P3 2024 (May / Jun 24) | 7954 | 1602 |
|
P4 2024 (Jun / Jul 24) | 8506 | 1769 |
|
P5 2024 (Jul / Aug 24) | 8243 | 1673 |
|
P6 2024 (Aug / Sep 24) | 7778 | 1669 |
|
P7 2024 (Sep / Oct 24) | 8196 | 1646 |
|
P8 2024 (Oct / Nov 24) | 8394 | 1571 |
|
P9 2024 (Nov / Dec 24) | 8472 | 1524 |
|
P10 2024 (Dec 24 / Jan 25) | 8827 | 1756 |
|
P11 2024 (Jan 25) | 8152 | 1611 |
|
P12 2024 (Feb 25) | 7797 | 1410 |
|
P13 2024 (Mar 25) | 7345 | 1451 |
|
P1 2025 (Apr 25) | 7030 | 1541 |
|
P2 2025 (Apr / May 25) | 7443 | 1546 |
|
P3 2025 (May / Jun 25) | 7420 | 1576 | 1055 |
P4 2025 (Jun / Jul 25) | 7578 | 1557 | 5175 |
P5 2025 (Jul / Aug 25) | 7976 | 1937 | 5727 |
P6 2025 (Aug / Sep 25) | 8097 | 1937 | 5916 |
P7 2025 (Sep / Oct 25) | 8033 | 2045 | 5130 |
P8 2025 (Oct / Nov 25) | 8113 | 2226 | 5453 |
P9 2025 (Nov 25 / Dec 25) | 8663 | 2122 | 4997 |
P10 2025 (Dec 25 / Jan 26) | 8986 | 2034 | 5471 |
P11 2025 (Jan 26) | 8578 | 1944 | 5416 |
P12 2025 (Feb 26) | 8281 | 1767 | 4741 |
P13 2025 (Mar 26) | 7824 | 1665 | 5091 |
P1 2026 (Apr 26) | 8056 | 1744 | 4533 |
Table 2:
Absences by days lost, presented by calendar month
(Southeastern)
| SOUTHEASTERN |
Feb-24 | 5692 |
Mar-24 | 5369 |
Apr-24 | 5205 |
May-24 | 5330 |
Jun-24 | 4700 |
Jul-24 | 5783 |
Aug-24 | 5418 |
Sep-24 | 5482 |
Oct-24 | 6279 |
Nov-24 | 5510 |
Dec-24 | 6302 |
Jan-25 | 6678 |
Feb-25 | 5594 |
Mar-25 | 5309 |
Apr-25 | 5368 |
May-25 | 5144 |
Jun-25 | 5064 |
Jul-25 | 5714 |
Aug-25 | 5029 |
Sep-25 | 5717 |
Oct-25 | 5903 |
Nov-25 | 5341 |
Dec-25 | 6531 |
Jan-26 | 5879 |
Feb-26 | 4756 |
Mar-26 | 5533 |
Apr-26 | 5374 |
Table 3:
Absences by percentage, presented by Rail Period
(LNER, c2c, Greater Anglia, West Midlands Trains)
| LNER | c2c | GA | WMT |
P11 2023 (broadly Jan 24) | 6.46% |
|
|
|
P12 2023 (Feb 24) | 5.91% |
|
|
|
P13 2023 (Mar 24) | 5.25% |
|
|
|
P1 2024 (Apr 24) | 5.35% |
|
|
|
P2 2024 (Apr / May 24) | 5.56% |
|
|
|
P3 2024 (May / Jun 24) | 5.34% |
|
|
|
P4 2024 (Jun / Jul 24) | 5.25% |
|
|
|
P5 2024 (Jul / Aug 24) | 6.06% |
|
|
|
P6 2024 (Aug / Sep 24) | 5.96% |
|
|
|
P7 2024 (Sep / Oct 24) | 5.66% |
|
|
|
P8 2024 (Oct / Nov 24) | 6.33% |
|
|
|
P9 2024 (Nov / Dec 24) | 6.48% |
|
|
|
P10 2024 (Dec 24 / Jan 25) | 7.34% |
|
|
|
P11 2024 (Jan 25) | 7.05% |
|
|
|
P12 2024 (Feb 25) | 5.86% |
|
|
|
P13 2024 (Mar 25) | 5.43% |
|
|
|
P1 2025 (Apr 25) | 5.15% |
|
|
|
P2 2025 (Apr / May 25) | 5.15% |
|
|
|
P3 2025 (May / Jun 25) | 5.08% |
|
|
|
P4 2025 (Jun / Jul 25) | 5.31% |
|
|
|
P5 2025 (Jul / Aug 25) | 5.75% | 5.49% |
|
|
P6 2025 (Aug / Sep 25) | 5.84% | 6.45% |
|
|
P7 2025 (Sep / Oct 25) | 5.97% | 5.56% | 4.68% |
|
P8 2025 (Oct / Nov 25) | 5.88% | 4.74% | 4.39% |
|
P9 2025 (Nov 25 / Dec 25) | 6.24% | 3.73% | 5.06% |
|
P10 2025 (Dec 25 / Jan 26) | 7.08% | 4.34% | 5.09% |
|
P11 2025 (Jan 26) | 7.36% | 3.93% | 5.04% |
|
P12 2025 (Feb 26) | 7.36% | 3.18% | 4.71% | 6.72% |
P13 2025 (Mar 26) | 6.94% | 3.24% | 4.82% | 7.09% |
P1 2026 (Apr 26) | 6.35% | 4.68% | 4.78% | 5.09% |
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many (a) Notices to Improve and (b) written instructions her Department issued to train operating companies for which the Department is the operator in relation to (i) service performance and (ii) financial control in each month since December 2025 up to...
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many (a) Notices to Improve and (b) written instructions her Department issued to train operating companies for which the Department is the operator in relation to (i) service performance and (ii) financial control in each month since December 2025 up to...
The Department's priority objectives for train operators are to improve performance and reduce financial subsidy. It does not routinely publish specific instructions made to operators.
We have asked train operators to reflect how they will deliver these priorities in their plans for the next five years. The output of those plans will be published in due course.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what discussions she has had with (a) Ministers and (b) officials on the (i) the transfer of workers from private Train Operating Companies into the Department for Transport Operator and (ii) the transfer of workers from (A) the Department for Transport Operator...
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what discussions she has had with (a) Ministers and (b) officials on the (i) the transfer of workers from private Train Operating Companies into the Department for Transport Operator and (ii) the transfer of workers from (A) the Department for Transport Operator...
Officials regularly update Ministers as part of every transfer of train operating companies’ services into public ownership. This includes discussions about the transfer of staff to the new public sector operator, which will be a subsidiary of Department for Transport Operator (DFTO), under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations (TUPE) process.
Establishing Great British Railways (GBR) is a priority for the Government, so the Secretary of State holds regular discussions with Ministers and officials. These discussions would include the transition into GBR of DFTO and Network Rail.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what the projected savings from the removal of management and performance fees payable to private sector train operating companies are estimated to be; and over what time period those savings will be realised.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what the projected savings from the removal of management and performance fees payable to private sector train operating companies are estimated to be; and over what time period those savings will be realised.
Public ownership is estimated to save taxpayers up to £110-150 million every year on fees currently paid to privately-owned train operating companies, once all services currently delivered under contract with the Department have transferred.