Skip to main content

1-20 of 180 results for subject:"Trial in camera"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, there is no need to take any time to establish that all of the members of the Joint Committee believe in the importance of trial by jury. That was not the issue. The issue was whether jury trial was appropriate in defamation cases. Most of us went into...

Member
Lord Mawhinney (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2013
Reference
742 c350GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is my honour to open this, the fourth day of the debate on the gracious Speech. At the outset, I express my sadness that I shall not be faced across the Dispatch Box in future debates on Ministry of Justice business by the noble Lord,

Lord Bach....

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 May 2012
Reference
737 cc258-264
House
House of Lords

In support of the Minister’s position, although I do not entirely agree with it, one can see the anomalies that can arise, as he pointed out. What if there was a fight between a member of the Air Force and a member of the Army? I come from a garrison...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2006
Reference
685 c368-9
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, has overlooked the fact that my noble friend’s amendment says that it is a provision for the majority of the court martial panel. Personally, I think that it is a rather weak amendment but I still strongly support it.

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2006
Reference
685 c369
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 182: After Clause 354, insert the following new clause- ““SPECIAL PROVISION FOR SERVICE PERSONNEL UNDER THE AGE OF 18 (1) Service personnel under the age of 18 are not permitted to serve in combat areas. (2) Service personnel under the age of 18 are not permitted to...

Member
Lord Garden (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2006
Reference
685 c432-3
House
House of Lords

I am deeply sympathetic to the tales told us by the noble Earl, Lord Attlee. Of course his amendment does not address the Ministry of Defence’s lack of support to individuals who found themselves with job problems when they returned from service. That is a question of implementation rather than...

Member
Lord Garden (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2006
Reference
685 c415
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 205: After Clause 373, insert the following new clause- ““ALIGNMENT OF SDAS ETC WITH THIS ACT (1) The Secretary of State may by order amend or repeal any provision of an enactment within subsection (3) for the purpose of reducing or eliminating any difference between the effect...

Member
Lord Drayson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2006
Reference
685 c459-60
House
House of Lords

The language of pardon is rooted in our Christian history. What pardon does is clear the agenda. In this case, it lifts a cloud that has drifted from the First World War across our history. It has the genius that it does not require us to pass judgment on anyone....

Member
Bishop of Chelmsford (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2006
Reference
685 c425
House
House of Lords

With Amendment No. 171 my noble friend Lord Attlee raises an important point about the maintenance of records. I support his amendment. There has been considerable concern in the country about the casualty figures, and it is vital that records are kept.

Member
Lord Astor of Hever (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2006
Reference
685 c413
House
House of Lords

I have put my name to the amendment, and shall say a very few words. The Minister, senior military personnel and some of the legal drafting team held a briefing meeting earlier this week, for which I was very grateful. It was certainly illuminating. I understand from the meeting that...

Member
Baroness D'Souza (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2006
Reference
685 c438
House
House of Lords

I strongly support my noble friend. I am unhappy about mixed panels, with the obvious exception of where there are defendants from more than one service. Although it is normal for all the services of the Armed Forces to work together, each service maintains a very different ethos. Personally, I...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2006
Reference
685 c364
House
House of Lords

My Amendment No. 186 would quantify the military experience required. It is in line with other parts of the Bill where we have looked for military experience. We generally support Amendment No. 185, although, if it were earlier, I might have wanted to debate what, "““approved by the Chiefs of...

Member
Lord Garden (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2006
Reference
685 c444
House
House of Lords

The two previous speakers have spoken eloquently to the amendments. In our debates so far on the Bill, no one has disputed the need for a tri-services discipline Act. I am certain that our servicemen will draw comfort from the fact that they are seen to be different by virtue...

Member
Lord Boyce (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2006
Reference
685 c444-5
House
House of Lords

I recognise that this is an important area of the Bill. It is a subject on which we have had many discussions over the past months during the Bill’s passage, both in this House and at the briefings at the Ministry of Defence. We recognise the strong feelings about it...

Member
Lord Drayson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2006
Reference
685 c445-7
House
House of Lords

I rise briefly to urge the Minister to accept this amendment, or something similar.

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2006
Reference
685 c445
House
House of Lords

I support the amendment in the name of my noble and gallant friend Lord Inge. In preparing for our debates on this Bill, I have spoken with the Adjutant-General of the Army, the person responsible for discipline, a post that I once held. I asked him which aspects of the...

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2006
Reference
685 c445
House
House of Lords

My name also has been added to the first of the two amendments and I strongly support it. It should be considered absolutely essential that the person who is taking prosecutorial decisions about our service men and women not only understands and appreciates the context in which they operate, but...

Member
Lord Astor of Hever (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2006
Reference
685 c445
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 186A: Page 181, line 11, leave out ““Supreme Court”” and insert ““Court of Judicature”” On Question, amendment agreed to. Clause 359, as amended, agreed to.

Member
Lord Drayson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2006
Reference
685 c448
House
House of Lords

I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 186 not moved.] Clause 358, as amended, agreed to. Clause 359 [Prosecuting officers]:

Member
Lord Inge (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2006
Reference
685 c447
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble and gallant Lord. I recognise the strong feeling in the services on this matter and I shall do as he requests.

Member
Lord Drayson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2006
Reference
685 c447
House
House of Lords