1-8 of 8 results for subject:"Tribunal Procedure Committee"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.186 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.001 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Tribunal Procedure Committee"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Tribunal Procedure Committee" OR subject_ses:84153
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
Amendment 66 to clause 2, discussed with Government amendments, amendment 67, clause stand part and schedule 2. Amendment 66 negatived on division (2 votes to 11). Amendment 67 negatived on division (2 votes to 11). Clause 2, as amended, agreed to on division (11 votes to 2). Schedule 2 agreed to on division (11 votes to 2). Amendment 88 to clause 3 debated and withdrawn. Clause 3 agreed to on division (10 votes to 2). Amendment 63 to clause 4, discussed with Government amendments, Government new clause 2, amendment 68, clauses 4 and 5 stand part, and schedule 3. Amendment 63 negatived on division (2 votes to 10). Clause 4 agreed to on division (10 votes to 2). Amendment 68 to schedule 3 negatived on division (2 votes to 10). Schedule 3 agreed to as amended. Clause 5 agreed to on division (10 votes to 2). Clause 6 discussed with Government amendments. Clause 6, as amended, agreed to on division (11 votes to 2). Clause 7 agreed to on division (11 votes to 2). Amendment 83 to clause 8, discussed with amendment 89 and clause stand part. Amendment 83 negatived on division (2 votes to 11). Amendment 89 negatived on division (4 votes to 9). Clause 8 agreed to on division (11 votes to 2). Government amendment to clause 9, discussed with amendment 90 and clause stand part. Government amendment agreed to. Amendment 90 negatived on division (2 votes to 10). Clause 9, as amended, agreed to on division (11 votes to 1). Clause 10, discussed with Government new clause 1, agreed to. Amendment 91 to clause 11, discussed with clause stand part, clause 12 stand part, Government amendments, and Government new clauses 3 and 4. Amendment 91 negatived on division (2 votes to 11). Clause 11, as amended, agreed to on division (11 votes to 2). Clause 12, as amended, agreed to on division (11 votes to 2). Amendment 92 to clause 13, discussed with clause stand part and new clause 28. Amendment 92 negatived on division (5 votes to 9). Clause 13 agreed to on division (12 votes to 2). Clause 14, discussed with amendment 93, Government amendments, and clauses 14 and 15 stand part. Clause 14 agreed to. Clause 15 agreed to, as amended. Clause 16 agreed to. Committee adjourned till Thursday 15 October. Written evidence reported to the House.
Amendment 66 to clause 2, discussed with Government amendments, amendment 67, clause stand part and schedule 2. Amendment 66 negatived on division (2 votes to 11). Amendment 67 negatived on division (2 votes to 11). Clause 2, as amended, agreed to on division (11 votes to 2). Schedule 2 agreed...
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how much the Tribunal Procedure Committee spent on equality and diversity training in the 2022-23 financial year.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how much the Tribunal Procedure Committee spent on equality and diversity training in the 2022-23 financial year.
On 02 October, the Chancellor of the Exchequer announced a value for money audit of all Equality, Diversity and Inclusion spending in the Civil Service.
The audit will dovetail with the public sector productivity review, aiming at delivering a leaner, more efficient government. The audit forms part of our drive to improve productivity across the public sector by driving down waste and improving performance.
The findings and actions of the audit will be announced by the Chancellor in the Autumn.
Clause 32 agreed to. Schedule 5 agreed to. Clauses 33 to 36 agreed to. Amendment 69 to clause 37 negatived on division (5 to 7). Amendment 72 to clause 37 negatived on division (5 to 7). Clause 37 agreed to. Clause 38, discussed with new clause 10 (Publicly funded legal representation for bereaved people at inquests), new clause 11 (Removal of the means test for legal help prior to inquest hearing) and new clause 12 (Eligibility for bereaved people to access legal aid under existing provisions), under consideration.
Clause 32 agreed to. Schedule 5 agreed to. Clauses 33 to 36 agreed to. Amendment 69 to clause 37 negatived on division (5 to 7). Amendment 72 to clause 37 negatived on division (5 to 7). Clause 37 agreed to. Clause 38, discussed with new clause 10 (Publicly funded legal...
To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Keen of Elie on 13 July 2018 (HL9105), what steps they have taken to encourage the Tribunal Procedure Committee to reach a decision regarding the implementation of the Government's proposals to cap the time between an initial Home Office...
To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Keen of Elie on 13 July 2018 (HL9105), what steps they have taken to encourage the Tribunal Procedure Committee to reach a decision regarding the implementation of the Government's proposals to cap the time between an initial Home Office...
The Tribunal Procedure Committee is independent of government and it would be inappropriate for ministers or their officials to interfere in the Committee’s decision making.
To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Keen of Elie on 13 July 2018 (HL9105), what progress has been made by the Tribunals Procedure Committee in deciding on new rules for detained appellants.
To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Keen of Elie on 13 July 2018 (HL9105), what progress has been made by the Tribunals Procedure Committee in deciding on new rules for detained appellants.
Between 12 July and 4 October 2018 the Tribunal Procedure Committee held a consultation on rules to govern cases where an immigration or asylum appellant is detained.
The Committee is considering its response, in accordance with the provisions of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the timetable is for his Department to respond to the Tribunal Procedure Committee consultation on Tribunal Procedure (First-Tier Tribunal) (Health, Education and Social Care Chamber) Rules 2008, published on 22 March 2018.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the timetable is for his Department to respond to the Tribunal Procedure Committee consultation on Tribunal Procedure (First-Tier Tribunal) (Health, Education and Social Care Chamber) Rules 2008, published on 22 March 2018.
The Tribunal Procedure Committee’s consultation closed on 14 June. The Committee will publish a response to its consultation in due course, which the Ministry of Justice will then consider. The Committee is independent of Government and will set its own timetable.
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether the Tribunal Procedure Committee has reached a decision regarding the implementation of the Government’s proposals to cap the time between an initial Home Office decision to remove a detained foreign criminal or failed asylum seeker and the conclusion of their appeal to the First-tier...
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether the Tribunal Procedure Committee has reached a decision regarding the implementation of the Government’s proposals to cap the time between an initial Home Office decision to remove a detained foreign criminal or failed asylum seeker and the conclusion of their appeal to the First-tier...
The Tribunal Procedure Committee has considered the Government’s policy proposals. Before making a decision about new rules for detained appellants it will hold a consultation, in accordance with the provisions of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007.
SI 2008/1149. (Negative instrument). Together with an explanatory memorandum from the Ministry of Justice. Coming into force 19 May 2008.
SI 2008/1149. (Negative instrument). Together with an explanatory memorandum from the Ministry of Justice. Coming into force 19 May 2008.