Skip to main content

1-20 of 218 results for subject:"US Congress"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

On a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker. The hon. Member for Clacton (Nigel Farage), at a congressional hearing and in written evidence, has suggested that the US Government explore possible trade consequences in response to the UK’s Online Safety Act 2023. Would you agree that suggesting that a foreign...

Member
Peter Prinsley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2025
Reference
772 c634
House
House of Commons

Statistical summary of the 2012 US Presidential election, including detailed results of Presidential, Senate and Hosue of Representatives elections

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
16 November 2012
Reference
RP12-69

That this House welcomes two bills presently in the US Congress, the Rise Out of Poverty Act (RISE Act) and the Women's Option to Raise Kids Act (WORK Act), which make the elimination of child poverty the first priority of welfare policy and recognise the right of all mothers, including...

Primary sponsor
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
5 November 2012
Reference
683
House
House of Commons

This Research Paper provides a detailed account of the key issues and perspectives raised at these hearings. Like the Treasury Select Committee in the UK, a number of influential US committees concerned with financial issues have convened hearings featuring expert witnesses from the executive branch, the federal regulators and the...

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
23 June 2009
Reference
RP09-58

Elections for US President, Senate, House of Representatives and 11 State Governors, 4 November 2008. Democratic candidate Senator Barack Obama won the US Presidential Election, defeating the Republican candidate Senator John McCain.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
14 November 2008
Reference
RP08-84

From a Government—[Interruption.] I think that I have the Floor, Mr. Deputy Speaker.

Member
George Galloway (Respect Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
448 c1436
House
House of Commons

Forgive me, but I had better press on because I think that the wind-ups will start in about 10 minutes. My second point is specific to the United States. I speak as one who is a longstanding friend of the United States. My grandmother was an American citizen from Tennessee,...

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
448 c1439-40
House
House of Commons

Perhaps another reason was that the Home Secretary retained residual discretion not to extradite.

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
448 c1420
House
House of Commons

My right hon. and learned Friend is of course right. That is one of the issues that have arisen over the past two weeks. When people have written to me saying that the Home Secretary should exercise his discretion not to extradite, I have had to write back pointing out...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
448 c1421
House
House of Commons

The provisions of the European convention on extradition were incorporated in the Extradition Act 1989 by the Conservative Government, but the natural forum protection provisions were not. Why did the Conservative Government not include those provisions?

Member
Mike O'Brien (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
448 c1420
House
House of Commons

The Solicitor-General makes a good point. The answer to his question is that I do not know, but I would hazard a guess. At that time, we were still operating on the basis of having to show a prima facie case. The removal of that essential safeguard makes it all...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
448 c1420
House
House of Commons

At the cost of arguing against myself, I did mention Guantanamo. I do not think there is any evidence that the three people involved in this case will be given uniforms like those who are detained there. We should also bear in mind what the United States Supreme Court has...

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
448 c1422-3
House
House of Commons

I have listened carefully to my hon. Friend’s argument, and it is an important argument—but, with the greatest respect to my hon. Friend, he is making a legal point. He is claiming that there is not a broad similarity between the two tests. As far as I can see, this...

Member
Mike O'Brien (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
448 c1423
House
House of Commons

I have reservations and concerns about what we are debating, but I will say this: if the position were different and either of the Opposition parties were in office, the same procedure would be taking place. I know that the Opposition parties do not agree. My hon. and learned Friend...

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
448 c1421-2
House
House of Commons

When the hon. Gentleman reflects on the American system, perhaps he should keep in mind Guantanamo Bay, and also the extraordinarily long prison sentences that are being imposed in respect of matters that would attract very modest sentences in this country.

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
448 c1422
House
House of Commons

I want to clarify the nature of the hon. Gentleman’s argument. He seems almost to be suggesting that we should make it the responsibility of a judge at a hearing to determine whether it is appropriate for the Serious Fraud Office in this case, but in other cases the Crown...

Member
Mike O'Brien (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
448 c1419-20
House
House of Commons

I am afraid that the Solicitor-General again does himself less than justice. Other courts, such as the Irish jurisdiction, are perfectly capable of resolving the issue of the forum test. He has once again moved from the general points that I want to make to the particular points about the...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
448 c1420
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Member for Sheffield, Hallam (Mr. Clegg) on obtaining the debate and on the way in which he opened it. I also congratulate the shadow Attorney-General on the extremely cogent points that he made, and I find myself in total agreement with the speech of the hon....

Member
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
448 c1424-5
House
House of Commons

And what is more, the imbalance is perpetuated in the terms of article 8(3)(c) of the treaty. The imbalance is actually stated there.

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
448 c1425
House
House of Commons

Indeed, it is stated explicitly in article 8(3)(c). The difference, in a nutshell, is this. In order to obtain the extradition of anyone from the United States, we have to show that there is probable cause that the person concerned has committed the relevant offence, whereas the United States has...

Member
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
448 c1425
House
House of Commons