Skip to main content

1-20 of 76 results for subject:"VT Group"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Defence Committee
Date
17 June 2008
Reference
HC 718-i 2007-08
House
House of Commons

Statement on the spending review and aircraft carriers.

Lead member
Lord Browne of Ladyton
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
25 July 2007
Reference
463 c865-80
House
House of Commons

Lords statement on the spending review and aircraft carriers.

Lead member
Lord Drayson
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
25 July 2007
Reference
694 c836-48
House
House of Lords

2012 and 2015.

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Oral question time interventions
Date
25 July 2007
Reference
463 c868
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is a champion for his community, although I wonder if those whom he purports to champion understand the consequences for his community and jobs there of his view on the deterrent. I understand the hon. Gentleman’s argument, but decisions about where to base the carriers—they are to...

Member
Lord Browne of Ladyton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 July 2007
Reference
463 c874-5
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman describes the budget in the early years of this Government. My recollection is that we came to power with a commitment to follow the planned budget of the previous Conservative Government. We inherited an economic situation that required significant attention and a legacy of under-investment not only...

Member
Lord Browne of Ladyton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 July 2007
Reference
463 c877
House
House of Commons

I welcome the statement and thank the Secretary of State for advance sight of it. On the spending announcement, the Secretary of State will understand that we will wish to study the content in detail over the coming period. It will be important for us to ensure that the difficulties...

Member
Willie Rennie (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 July 2007
Reference
463 c870
House
House of Commons

I welcome the hon. Gentleman’s welcome for the announcement. As I said, the carriers will sustain and create 10,000 jobs in the UK, and during the peak assembly time that will mean nearly 5,000 jobs at the four main yards of Rosyth, Govan, Portsmouth and Barrow. Of course, detailed negotiations...

Member
Lord Browne of Ladyton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 July 2007
Reference
463 c871
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker. May I apologise to you and to the House? I turned my telephone off before I came into the House, and I do not understand why it went off.

Member
Peter Viggers (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 July 2007
Reference
463 c869
House
House of Commons

I thank my right hon. Friend for his welcome and for his kind words. I pay tribute to the contribution that he has made to our ability to make the announcement on the carriers. When he was Minister with responsibility for the armed forces, he made a significant contribution to...

Member
Lord Browne of Ladyton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 July 2007
Reference
463 c870
House
House of Commons

I thank my right hon. Friend for his statement, which will be well received in the Royal Navy, particularly with regard to the aircraft carriers. It will be well received across the armed forces generally, and there is no question in my mind but that it will be well received...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 July 2007
Reference
463 c870
House
House of Commons

My Lords, like my noble and gallant friend Lord Bramall, I welcome much in the Statement, and I am sure that it will give particular pleasure to the Royal Navy. Like my noble and gallant friend, I am minded of the descriptions of ““affordability”” used in the Ministry of Defence....

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 July 2007
Reference
694 c846
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for repeating the Statement. I remind the House of my interest as a serving TA officer. I am disappointed with the content but, unfortunately, my party will not offer more or cut the commitments. This is a disaster. The Statement refers to...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 July 2007
Reference
694 c844-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not agree with the characterisation of the Statement given by the noble Earl. I agree that GDP is growing at a faster rate, but that is not a reasonable basis for spending decisions. This is a real-terms increase in the defence budget. As we said when...

Member
Lord Drayson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 July 2007
Reference
694 c845-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend for those comments and I pay tribute to his contribution as my predecessor in the role of Defence Procurement Minister. A sustained effort has been required over a number of years to bring us to this point today and I agree with him...

Member
Lord Drayson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 July 2007
Reference
694 c843
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to noble Lords for their welcome of the Statement. I will do my utmost to answer their questions. The noble Lord, Lord Astor, asked about the contract. I am pleased to inform the House that, following the announcement, BAE and VT have confirmed the creation...

Member
Lord Drayson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 July 2007
Reference
694 c841-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as someone involved in the aircraft carrier project for a few years, I congratulate my noble friend on the announcement he has made today. It will be widely welcomed, not just in the Navy, which deserves such a declaration, but around the country too. Does he agree that...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 July 2007
Reference
694 c842-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Government initiated a naval base review because they felt that there was considerable overcapacity. The Minister will know that the review is of profound importance to the Royal Navy and the economies of Plymouth, north Devon and, in fact, the entire south-west region. If the review is...

Member
Lord Burnett (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 July 2007
Reference
694 c844
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord is absolutely right that we have overcapacity in terms of the naval bases—he knows it from his experience—and the naval base review addressed that issue directly. My right honourable friend the Secretary of State directed that the review should end up with a level of...

Member
Lord Drayson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 July 2007
Reference
694 c844
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not want to sound churlish at all, because there is clearly a lot that is very good in the Statement and will naturally be welcomed by those who admire our Armed Forces, appreciate the wonderful job that they do and know that they deserve absolutely the...

Member
Lord Bramall (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 July 2007
Reference
694 c843
House
House of Lords