Skip to main content

1-20 of 180 results for subject:"Victims Advisory Panel"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Helen Grant
Answering member
Robert Flello
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Fifth Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
11 September 2013
House
House of Commons

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord McNally
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
15 July 2013
Reference
747 cc193-8GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that is enough radicalism for one afternoon.

This order abolishes the Victims’ Advisory Panel, which I will refer to as the VAP, using powers in the Public Bodies Act 2011. This Act followed the 2010 review of all arm’s-length bodies, which was conducted to increase transparency and accountability, to...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2013
Reference
747 cc193-6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, public outrage about the abolition of the Victims’ Advisory Panel has been conspicuous by its absence, and the Opposition and I have no qualms about the Government’s decision to abolish it in the light of the appointment of successive commissioners. For that matter, all of us who heard...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2013
Reference
747 cc196-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am slightly surprised that the noble Lord raised the question of political appointments, even in the terms in which he couched his remarks. I find it extraordinary that somehow we back away from making appointments from the rich vein of political talent that is in the House....

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2013
Reference
747 cc197-8GC
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee
Date
14 May 2013
Reference
HL 4 2013-14
House
House of Lords
Laid by
Secretary Chris Grayling
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Public body orders
Date
25 April 2013
Reference
SI 2013/2853
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Type
Command papers
Date
15 December 2011
Reference
Cm 8235
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how much he expects to save through the abolition of the Victims' Advisory Panel.

Asked by
Jonathan Ashworth (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
73677; 533 c536W
House
House of Commons

I assure the noble Lord that the hard men have done nothing. All I am advised is that he is ill.

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2011
Reference
725 c1459
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Ofcom is a highly respected organisation that, since its creation by the Office of Communications Act 2002, has successfully regulated one of the most dynamic and diverse sectors. The media and communications market has developed significantly since Ofcom was created and it is only appropriate that eight years...

Member
Baroness Rawlings (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2011
Reference
725 c1509-10
House
House of Lords

64: Clause 2, page 1, line 14, at beginning insert ““Subject to section (Restrictions on ministerial powers),”” Amendment 64 agreed. Amendment 65 Moved by

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2011
Reference
725 c1402
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Taylor, for a full response to the issues raised. He went a very long way to reassuring me about how this will operate. I do not disagree with him when he says that ultimately Ministers must be accountable. I very much agree...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2011
Reference
725 c1458
House
House of Lords

I say to my noble friend that I have never claimed that bishops should live in these palaces. I do not want them to live in these palaces. The noble Lord, Lord Howarth, thinks that, but that is not my argument. My argument is that the Church of England has...

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2011
Reference
725 c1486-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have taken part in this debate. I must say that when I moved the amendment I had no idea what direction the debate would take, but I did not anticipate that it would move in the way in which it did. I...

Member
Lord Inglewood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2011
Reference
725 c1490-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is indeed a very late hour, and I rise only briefly to thank the noble Baroness, Lady Thornton, for raising this issue in quite moderate terms. I also thank my noble friend Lord Lester for the way in which he has nuanced it in relation both to...

Member
Lord Boswell of Aynho (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2011
Reference
725 c1494-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, support Amendment 65A, particularly subsections (1)(d), (2)(c) and (2)(d). I declare an interest as an actress, broadcaster and producer. I shall speak first on subsection (1)(d) and the subject of diversity. For nearly 40 years now, I have spoken about the need to reflect diversity in...

Member
Baroness Benjamin (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2011
Reference
725 c1422-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I add my support to the amendment moved by my noble friend Lord Stevenson. I do so as someone who served until the general election on the Select Committee on Communications of your Lordships' House. Shortly before the election, the committee produced a detailed report on the state...

Member
Baroness McIntosh of Hudnall (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2011
Reference
725 c1421-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for the Minister’s reply. Indeed, at one point he used the word ““agreeable””, which perhaps raised my expectations too much. This short debate has demonstrated a need for the Government to provide a clearer explanation of what they are doing in this area. I saw...

Member
Lord Whitty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2011
Reference
725 c1411-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it has been a long time since we last discussed these matters in Committee. Perhaps I may be forgiven for forgetting that I had added my name to that of my noble friend Lord Whitty on one of the amendments that we are now considering—Amendment 85. Since I...

Member
Lord Borrie (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2011
Reference
725 c1407
House
House of Lords