Skip to main content

1-20 of 335 results for subject:"Vote Leave"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether his Department is taking steps to ensure that there is an investigation of alleged links between financial backers of the Vote Leave campaign and Russian intelligence.

Asked by
Alex Sobel (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 October 2020
Reference
95208
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to follow the right hon. Member for Broadland (Mr Simpson); I will miss him at breakfast time.

My late father’s birthday was on 5 November. My father, Colin Lucas and my mother, Alice Lucas, were profound influences on me and they taught me some very basic values....

Member
Ian Lucas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 November 2019
Reference
667 cc719-721
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Minister for the Cabinet Office, if he will instruct the Electoral Commission to investigate the circumstances and implications for electoral reform of the offences committed by VoteLeave in relation to the 2016 Referendum campaign.

Asked by
Ian Lucas (Labour)
Answering body
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Minister for the Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
5 September 2019
Reference
287544
House
House of Commons
Deposited by
Whips Office (Lords)
Type
Deposited papers
Date
2 May 2019
Reference
DEP2019-0525
House
House of Lords

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, with reference to the recent report of the Electoral Commission into the activities of Vote Leave, whether the Government has plans to set up a judge-led public inquiry to investigate the alleged fraud committed by Vote Leave during the EU referendum 2016.

Asked by
Stewart Malcolm McDonald (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 April 2019
Reference
240037
House
House of Commons

If he will make an assessment of the implications for his policies of the Electoral Commission’s decision that a new investigation into the Vote Leave campaign would not be in the public interest.

Asked by
Rupa Huq (Labour)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 April 2019
Reference
910484
House
House of Commons

The consultation Protecting the Debate: Intimidation, Influence and Information was launched last
year. We are currently reviewing the responses and we will issue a response in due course.

The Electoral Commission is the independent regulatory body responsible for ensuring that elections and referendums are run effectively and in...

Member
Chloe Smith (Conservative)
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Ministerial corrections
Date
23 April 2019
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what discussions he has had with Cabinet colleagues on the conclusions of the Electoral Commission's report into the activities of Vote Leave and the alleged fraud committed during the EU referendum in 2016.

Asked by
Stewart Malcolm McDonald (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 April 2019
Reference
243515
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what discussions he has had with the Electoral Commission since Vote Leave's decision to drop its appeal against electoral offences committed during the EU referendum in 2016.

Asked by
Stewart Malcolm McDonald (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 April 2019
Reference
243516
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether he has received representations from the Metropolitan Police in relation to its investigations into the alleged fraud committed by Vote Leave during the EU referendum in 2016.

Asked by
Stewart Malcolm McDonald (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 April 2019
Reference
243517
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what discussions he has had with his European counterparts on the (a) recent report of the Electoral Commission into the activities of Vote Leave and (ii) alleged fraud committed by Vote Leave during the 2016 EU referendum.

Asked by
Stewart Malcolm McDonald (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 April 2019
Reference
243519
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, if he will make it Government policy to revoke Article 50 as a result of (a) the recent report of the Electoral Commission into the activities of Vote Leave, and (b) Vote Leave's decision to drop its appeal against alleged fraud committed...

Asked by
Stewart Malcolm McDonald (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 April 2019
Reference
243518
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House—

(i) approves the First Report from the Committee of Privileges (HC 1490); and

(ii) endorses the conclusions of the Committee in respect of the conduct of Mr Dominic Cummings that the evidence sought by the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee from Mr Cummings was relevant...

Member
Paul Maynard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 April 2019
Reference
657 cc941-2
House
House of Commons

I thank the Deputy Leader of the House for presenting the motion, and note that the Leader of the House is occupied with important matters elsewhere. I also thank the Committee of Privileges, chaired by my hon. Friend the Member for Stretford and Urmston (Kate Green), for all its work...

Member
Valerie Vaz (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 April 2019
Reference
657 cc942-3
House
House of Commons

I thank the Deputy Leader of the House for his statement. I also thank the Leader of the House for giving me notice that she would be unable to attend the Chamber today, and for the words that the Deputy Leader of the House read out on behalf of the...

Member
Damian Collins (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 April 2019
Reference
657 cc943-4
House
House of Commons

This is the heart of the matter. The report states that many of Mr Cummings’s communications were highly inappropriate, including some outside the House. He did not do himself any favours in that respect. I personally wanted to hear what he had to say, and I honestly believe that many...

Member
Julian Knight (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 April 2019
Reference
657 c944
House
House of Commons

Indeed. The questions that we wished to put to Mr Cummings were highly relevant to our inquiry. They were also highly relevant to evidence presented by other people, including representatives of organisations that had worked with him in his capacity as director of Vote Leave. I think that we should...

Member
Damian Collins (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 April 2019
Reference
657 c944
House
House of Commons

I understand the point that my hon. Friend is making, but is there not also an issue of consistency? I am told that Mark Zuckerberg also declined to give evidence to the Committee during the same inquiry. Moreover, it is quite common for Ministers to decline to give evidence to...

Member
George Eustice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 April 2019
Reference
657 c944
House
House of Commons

I do not believe that we are singling out one individual in this case. It is highly unusual for anyone to behave in the way in which Dominic Cummings behaved towards the Committee. My right hon. Friend is right in saying that we issued an invitation to Mark Zuckerberg, but...

Member
Damian Collins (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 April 2019
Reference
657 cc944-5
House
House of Commons

Will my hon. Friend confirm, then, that it is his view that it is illegitimate for Ministers ever to claim that they cannot give evidence to a Committee because legal proceedings on a particular issue are under way?

Member
George Eustice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 April 2019
Reference
657 c945
House
House of Commons