Skip to main content

1-20 of 191 results for subject:"Welsh Consumer Council"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Welsh Affairs Committee
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
HC 184 2008-09
House
House of Commons

Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill (HL). Committee stage first sitting (morning). Programme motion agreed to. Written evidence (Reporting to the House) motion agreed to. Clauses 1 to 3 agreed to. Schedule 1, as amended, agreed to.

Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Date
17 April 2007
Reference
PBC
House
House of Commons

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his reply. We debated this extensively in Committee. I suppose that the best argument against the amendment tabled in my name and that of my noble friend is that it will be the noble Lord, Lord Whitty, who is responsible for proving us...

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2007
Reference
689 c164-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the amendment seeksto require the Secretary of State to make an order to abolish Postwatch and to make that order subject to the affirmative resolution procedure in both Houses. Furthermore, the Secretary of State would not be permitted to make the order before 2010. I recognise the concerns...

Member
Lord Truscott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2007
Reference
689 c163-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his response. I particularly thank the noble Baroness, Lady Miller, for her support. She makes precisely the point that we are concerned about. I thank the noble Lord, Lord Borrie, for his intervention. Interestingly, he seemed to say, on the one hand, that...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2007
Reference
689 c138-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley, and the noble Baroness, Lady Wilcox, for affording us the opportunity to debate this important issue. I am also grateful to my noble friend Lord Borrie for his expert analysis. I shall refer later to some of the...

Member
Lord Truscott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2007
Reference
689 c137-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest as a sole trader and member of the Federation of Small Businesses. I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley, for raising this point, although we have not added our name to the amendment, for some of the reasons outlined by the...

Member
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2007
Reference
689 c137
House
House of Lords

My Lords, what did the Minister mean by ““depends on the market””? I do not understand that; perhaps I might do so if he repeated it.

Member
Baroness O'Cathain (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2007
Reference
689 c140
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the question was: under what circumstances would consumers cease to be designated? The response was that that would depend entirely on the market. It would need to be clear that designation was no longer required, and after consultation with the council, Scottish Ministers, Welsh Ministers and others my...

Member
Lord Truscott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2007
Reference
689 c140
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 5: 5: Clause 3 , page 2, line 37, leave out ““may”” and insert ““must”” The noble Baroness said: My Lords, in Committee we explored the meaning of ““designated consumers””. For the purposes of the Bill they are consumers who are losing their representative body, be it...

Member
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2007
Reference
689 c139
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Miller of Chilthorne Domer, and the noble Lord, Lord Razzall, for tabling the amendment and enabling us to discuss this issue once again. Clause 3 defines ““designated consumers”” as consumers of mains electricity and mains gas and postal services, and...

Member
Lord Truscott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2007
Reference
689 c139-40
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my amendment was merely a means of exploring the problem further. I am glad that I tabled it, because the issue needs to be addressed. I am not sure that I am happy with the clarity of the Minister’s reply, because the three sectors concerned here—energy, postal services...

Member
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2007
Reference
689 c141
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I remain completely dense about all of this. Does the use of ““market”” mean a group of designated consumers, or is it the marketplace?

Member
Baroness O'Cathain (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2007
Reference
689 c140
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am referring to consumers not suffering particular problems. I will write to the noble Baroness, Lady O’Cathain, on the issue. If I may continue to clarify that point, the concept of ““designated consumers”” permits the new council to undertake specific functions in respect of consumers of regulated...

Member
Lord Truscott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2007
Reference
689 c140
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 1: 1: Clause 1 , page 2, line 2, at end insert— ““(3A) The territorial committees may exercise, on behalf of the Council, the following functions— (a) in the case of the Scottish Consumer Council, the Council’s functions under sections 7 to 16, 18 and 20 to...

Member
Lord Truscott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2007
Reference
689 c131-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was not able to take part in the proceedings so far on the Bill but I have read them with interest. The Minister has virtually rewritten this part of the Bill. Why on earth did the Government pay so little attention to the requirements of devolution that...

Member
Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2007
Reference
689 c133-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the correspondence I have had with the Scottish Consumer Council representatives ““as is”” tends to suggest that they are very happy with the outcome of these discussions. It is to the Minister’s credit that he took on board the anxieties of a number of us and the consumer...

Member
Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2007
Reference
689 c134
House
House of Lords

moved Amendments Nos. 2 and 3: 2: Clause 1, page 2, leave out line 3 and insert— ““(4) A territorial committee also has the following purposes—”” 3: Clause 1, Divide Clause 1 into two clauses, the first (Establishment of the National Consumer Council and its territorial committees) to consist of...

Member
Lord Truscott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2007
Reference
689 c135
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 4: 4: Clause 2, page 2, line 25, at end insert— ““( ) a ““consumer”” includes a person who purchases, uses or receives goods or services for the purpose of their own business;”” The noble Lord said: I return to this amendment following Committee, in part because...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2007
Reference
689 c135-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I question the usefulness and desirability of the amendment. Indeed, I am rather surprised that the Opposition have brought it forward again on Report in more or less the same form as it was in Grand Committee. When the amendment was moved in Grand Committee bythe noble Baroness,...

Member
Lord Borrie (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2007
Reference
689 c136-7
House
House of Lords