Skip to main content

1-20 of 761 results for subject:"Wembley Stadium"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether the Metropolitan Police originally recommended that the Special Escort Group was necessary to escort Taylor Swift to and from Wembley Stadium.

Asked by
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 October 2024
Reference
8993
House
House of Commons

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Nigel Huddleston
Answering member
James Murray
Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Fifth Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
16 April 2024
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Nigel Huddleston
Department
Treasury
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
26 February 2024
Reference
SI 2024/546; 2024/
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answers by Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay on 7 November (HL2798) and 24 November (HL3333), whether they have (1) monitored the implementation of all of the recommendations of the report by Baroness Casey of Blackstock into the disorder at Wembley Stadium in the UEFA...

Asked by
Lord Birt (Crossbench)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 December 2022
Reference
HL3798
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government whether all of the issues of accountability identified in the report by Baroness Casey of Blackstock into the disorder at Wembley Stadium in the UEFA Euro 2020 Final, published on 3 December 2021, have been resolved; whether her recommendations for action have been implemented; and...

Asked by
Lord Birt (Crossbench)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2022
Reference
HL2798
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I ought first to declare an interest as a Manchester City fan who plans to attend the FA cup semi-final against Liverpool, but is it not wrong to hold that match between two north-west teams at Wembley on a weekend when there are no trains running from the north-west to London? What influence will the Government use to get the FA to sort this problem out, ideally by moving the semi-final to another venue? Is this not just further evidence that we need the voice of fans in football decision making, and that the fan-led review needs to be urgently implemented in full?

Asked by
Jeff Smith (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
24 March 2022
Reference
711 c425
House
House of Commons

There were a number of questions there. We are working with the Department for Transport and trying to ameliorate that situation. It is an FA decision, so we are also discussing it with the FA. It is important that we get the fan-led review in place. We have agreed in principle to a regulator, and we hope to bring that forward as soon as possible.

Answered by
Nadine Dorries (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
24 March 2022
Reference
711 c425
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what progress they have made with football authorities towards addressing the (1) safety, and (2) security, implications of the report by Baroness Casey of Blackstone An independent Review of events surrounding the UEFA Euro 2020 Final ‘Euro Sunday’ at Wembley, published on 3 December 2021.

Asked by
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
26 January 2022
Reference
818 cc297-300
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I begin by putting on record again our appreciation of the sterling work of the noble Baroness, Lady Casey of Blackstock, on this review. The Government recognise the critical importance of the safety and security implications of her report. We are now working with relevant parties, including the police and the football authorities, to consider not only those implications but the report’s recommendations in full. We are committed to ensuring that the UK continues its world-leading reputation for holding safe and successful major international sporting events.

Answered by
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 January 2022
Reference
818 c297
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Baroness, Lady Casey, described the crowd events at Wembley’s Euro final as a “near miss” for fatalities and life-changing injuries and said that we need a

national conversation about kicking racism and hooliganism out of football. Can the Minister tell us what plans the Government have for taking forward her six recommendations in full to improve safety, security and behaviour at football matches? Why did the Government not use the recent opportunity of a police Bill to incorporate new tailgating and drug-disorderly football banning orders, and to create a new offence of endangering public safety, as the report recommended?

Asked by
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 January 2022
Reference
818 c297
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we acknowledge that the review shows that these events were foreseeable, but they were unprecedented. As in the previous exchange we had on this, it is important to underline that the blame lies squarely with the minority of supporters who caused the disorder and aimed to spoil the day for everybody else. It is clear that in future, we must ensure that the safety and security arrangements for an event such as this are in line with its national significance. The review was commissioned by the FA, so the Government do not intend to respond formally as the Government; the key thing is taking action. We are working with partners to ensure that we learn from it and that the recommendations are appropriately implemented. I pay tribute to the noble Lord for his recommendations on the online abuse of footballers, which were taken forward in the police Bill.

Answered by
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 January 2022
Reference
818 c298
House
House of Lords

My Lords, will the Government go a little further on their attitude to some of the recommendations in the report, predominantly that the stewards—the people inside provided by football to look after its own—were insufficient in number and not properly trained for this event? Could not the Government take this forward with the police to ensure that we have security at such events and do not overload our police forces?

Asked by
Lord Addington (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 January 2022
Reference
818 c298
House
House of Lords

As I said, we are working with the police on the implications of the noble Baroness’s report. Work is also being undertaken by the Sports Grounds Safety Authority to gather evidence on stewarding. Once that is concluded, the Government will work with it and other relevant parties to see how the findings are applicable not just to football but across the events industry.

Answered by
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 January 2022
Reference
818 c298
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this event brought shame and disgrace on our country as a whole, as well interfering with the championship game. The Minister mentioned the involvement of the police. How close have the police so far got to identifying who was behind this event? You do not produce 6,000 people storming a national football stadium very easily, so someone must have organised it. Are the police pursuing that line of interest?

Asked by
Lord Cunningham of Felling (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 January 2022
Reference
818 c298
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord is right that some of the actions that we saw on 11 July were shameful. The report is clear that the responsibility for the reckless and criminal behaviour lies with the shameful individuals who perpetrated it. The police have made 39 arrests and the

investigations are continuing. I am afraid I cannot give more of an update on those police inquiries beyond that, but action is being taken by the police in this matter.

Answered by
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 January 2022
Reference
818 c298
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in the discussions that the Government are having with the football authorities, could they also have one with the EFL about the appalling way it seems to be communicating its attitude towards the future of Derby County Football Club, which was one of the founding members of the Football League? The EFL seems to be deliberately withholding information. Perhaps one way out of this would be to make it subject to the Freedom of Information Act.

Asked by
Lord McLoughlin (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 January 2022
Reference
818 c299
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Government continue to engage closely with the EFL about Derby County. Ultimately it is for the EFL, the administrator and the club to resolve the issues that remain in order to ensure the survival of the club, but the Government have urged pragmatism from all parties to find a solution. Everyone wants to see one of the founding members of the Football League continue this season and beyond under appropriate ownership, and openness and transparency are a key part of that.

Answered by
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 January 2022
Reference
818 c299
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister will recall that on 6 December he answered a Private Notice Question on the excellent report by the noble Baroness, Lady Casey, when I declared my interest as vice-president of the charity Level Playing Field. Particular recommendations were made in respect of disabled supporters, disabled access to the stadium and the disgraceful way in which thugs effectively overran them. Would he be willing to meet representatives of Level Playing Field—the chairman, the chief executive and perhaps me—to discuss what the next steps should be?

Asked by
Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 January 2022
Reference
818 c299
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is right that the way in which football fans with disabilities, their friends and those accompanying them were tailgated and exploited by people intent on doing disorder was shameful. I think a meeting with my honourable friend the Sports Minister would be more appropriate. I am sure he would be very happy to do that, and I will follow that up with the noble Lord.

Answered by
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 January 2022
Reference
818 c299
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sure the Minister agrees that the noble Baroness, Lady Casey, deserves great credit for the speed with which she produced her thorough report, which is very practical and is to be taken seriously. But, my goodness, since then it seems to those of us who have been following this that very little action has been taken on her recommendations, yet incidents continue to happen at football grounds, as has been reported in recent games. Could the Minister use his good offices to encourage the Football Association and others to address the report, not just thoroughly but with some speed?

Asked by
Lord Laming (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 January 2022
Reference
818 c299
House
House of Lords