Skip to main content

1-20 of 30 results for subject:"West Suffolk"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Nick Timothy
Answering member
Matthew Pennycook
Department
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 cc298-306
House
House of Commons

I draw your attention, Madam Deputy Speaker, to my entry in the Register of Members’ Financial Interests. I also declare that my family and I are local residents affected by the development proposal we are about to discuss. I am grateful for this debate about the proposed Forest City, and...

Member
Nick Timothy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c298
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Member, my constituency neighbour, for allowing an intervention. I regard this as quite a bold idea, like the NHS; that was a bold idea just after the war. Let us try and use our imaginations: perhaps we will create a shining city—a city not...

Member
Peter Prinsley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c298
House
House of Commons

I think we have just had it—the people of West Suffolk will know that local Labour representatives are in favour of Forest City, which I think is shameful.

As I was saying, the resale model removes residential land value and caps resale at inflation-indexed build cost, excluding land. Where homes cost...

Member
Nick Timothy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 cc298-9
House
House of Commons

Although there are no proposals the size of a city in my constituency, there is a proposal to build thousands of new homes on the green belt in Hayes. Does my hon. Friend agree that this indiscriminate building on the green belt threatens communities and is swamping public services as...

Member
Peter Fortune (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c299
House
House of Commons

It is undoubtedly the case that we need to build more houses in this country, but schemes such as the one described by my hon. Friend must be proportionate for the areas in which they are proposed, and must come with infrastructure, services and amenities.

Member
Nick Timothy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c299
House
House of Commons

On that point about speculative building, I appreciate that the hon. Gentleman is probably not a fan of big, bold projects of this kind, but does he agree that there is a very good example just down the road in Cambridge? The recent sale of Cambridge City airport to Homes...

Member
Daniel Zeichner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c300
House
House of Commons

I completely agree, and I will come to the needs of Cambridge and the surrounding area.

You will have noticed, Madam Deputy Speaker, that none of the examples that I have just given is in a western country. That is because advanced economies do not build artificial communities from scratch in...

Member
Nick Timothy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c300
House
House of Commons

My constituency is in the path of the Oxford-Cambridge arc. I welcome the proposed development at Cambourne; there is also a proposal for a new town just south of the constituency, in Tempsford. Does the hon. Gentleman agree that Forest City could just be a huge distraction from the new...

Member
Ian Sollom (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c300
House
House of Commons

I do agree, but it is not just a distraction from the need to build in the way that that is needed in the broader region around Cambridge. Only today I received an email from one of my constituents who said, “I see that you have a debate. Please will...

Member
Nick Timothy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 cc300-2
House
House of Commons

I do not wish to declare my support for Forest City, but I wish to declare that there has to be some imagination here. It seems to me that the hon. Gentleman, my constituency neighbour, has not grasped the imagination behind this project. We are not talking about simply expanding...

Member
Peter Prinsley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c302
House
House of Commons

To be honest, I am at a complete loss as to how that does not express support for the scheme, and if the hon. Gentleman is saying that he does not support it after his earlier intervention, that may be a record U-turn even for this Labour party.

This debate presents...

Member
Nick Timothy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c303
House
House of Commons

Madam Deputy Speaker, please accept my sincere apologies for being slightly late to the Chamber.

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c303
House
House of Commons

Excellent. I am very glad to hear it. Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker.

I congratulate the hon. Member for West Suffolk (Nick Timothy) on securing this debate. I assure him that I have heard loud and clear his concerns about the high-level Forest City 1 proposals, and that I will reflect...

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 cc303-4
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for his considered answers to my questions. The point is that the Forest City developers are not seeking a process where Ministers consider an application using their quasi-judicial role; it is that they are seeking a policy decision to support the creation of a development corporation...

Member
Nick Timothy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 c304
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for that question, which pre-empts the next of his questions that I was going to come on to. He asked me specifically to rule out the establishment of a development corporation and the use of compulsory purchase powers for the construction of Forest City. I...

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
788 cc305-6
House
House of Commons

The Government cannot be held accountable for a misspeak by the BBC on these matters. The hon. Gentleman is going a bit far to find a conspiracy behind everything. I gently point out that the record has been corrected in relation to that council. The reality is that various requests...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2026
Reference
778 c1100
House
House of Commons

People in West Suffolk are furious at the prospect of the county council elections being cancelled yet again, and I reiterate my opposition to that decision. This morning, the BBC reported that Suffolk county council had requested that the elections be cancelled. That is completely untrue, as the county council...

Member
Nick Timothy (Conservative)
Type
Business questions
Date
15 January 2026
Reference
778 c1100
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if he will publish the location of ambulance stations by postcode (a) in West Suffolk constituency and (b) within 20 miles of that constituency.

Asked by
Nick Timothy (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 December 2024
Reference
17294
House
House of Commons

I am well aware of the strong case for the Ely junction improvement and the impact that will have on freight. That is absolutely being considered as we look towards the 10-year infrastructure strategy and we consider GBR’s stretching target for getting freight off the roads and on to the railways.

Answered by
Louise Haigh (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
21 November 2024
Reference
757 c368
House
House of Commons