Skip to main content

1-20 of 52,608 results for subject:Agriculture

Type

-
Early day motions (330)
+ Legislation (777) + Acts (23) + Private acts (2)
-
Local acts (2)
-
Public acts (21)
+ Bills (40)
-
Hybrid bills (1)
+ Public bills (39)
-
Consolidation bills (2)
-
Government bills (16)
+ Private members' bills (21)
-
Ballot bills (8)
-
Presentation bills (5)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (7)
+ Delegated legislation (714) + Statutory instruments (714)
-
Public body orders (1)
-
Regulatory reform orders (3)
+ Members' contributions (34,147)
-
Business questions (266)
-
Maiden speeches (82)
-
Oral answers to questions (3,531)
-
Oral question time interventions (50)
+ Oral questions (3,729)
-
Prime Minister's questions (169)
-
Topical questions (305)
-
Points of order (15)
-
Proceeding contributions (26,792)
+ Parliamentary committees (1,129) + Committee proceedings (570)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (6)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (34)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (70)
-
European Committee proceedings (31)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (13)
-
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (98)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (307)
-
Select Committee reports (252)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (92)
-
Select Committee written evidence (268)
+ Parliamentary papers (2,079)
-
Annual reports (37)
-
Command papers (98)
-
Consultation papers (205)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (7)
-
Deposited papers (853)
-
House of Commons papers (835)
-
House of Lords papers (59)
-
Impact assessments (82)
-
Proposed negative statutory instruments (8)
-
Treaties (16)
-
Unprinted command papers (3)
-
Unprinted papers (162)
-
White papers (7)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (1,948) + Debates (1,263)
-
Adjournment debates (159)
-
Backbench debates (21)
-
Budget debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (570)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (6)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (34)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (70)
-
European Committee proceedings (31)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (13)
-
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (98)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (307)
-
Debates on select committee reports (35)
-
Debates on treaties (4)
-
e-petition debates (8)
-
Estimates days (4)
+ Legislative debates (436)
-
Debates on bills (283)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (153)
+ Monarch's speech debates (31)
-
King's speech debates (1)
-
Queen's speech debates (30)
-
Opposition days (29)
-
Questions for short debate (55)
-
Topical debates (1)
+ Formal proceedings (18)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (6)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (12)
+ Petitions and observations (13)
-
Observations on petitions (5)
-
Paper petitions (8)
-
Private notice questions (2)
+ Statements (572) + Oral statements (100)
-
Business statements (4)
-
Ministerial statements (92)
-
Select Committee statements (2)
-
Written statements (472)
-
Urgent questions (6)
+ Written corrections (11)
-
Ministerial corrections (11)
+ Parliamentary questions (17,391)
-
Business questions (266)
+ Oral questions (3,729)
-
Prime Minister's questions (169)
-
Topical questions (305)
-
Private notice questions (2)
-
Urgent questions (6)
-
Written questions (13,388)
+ Petitions and observations (13)
-
Observations on petitions (5)
-
Paper petitions (8)
+ Research briefings (149) + Commons Briefing papers (62)
-
Briefing papers on bills (2)
-
Commons Debate packs (24)
+ Lords In Focus (1)
-
Lords In Focus - Topical (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (11)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (4)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (6)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Topical (1)
-
POSTbriefs (6)
-
POSTnotes (45)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of large-scale AI data centres on the availability of agricultural land for food production.

Asked by
Lord Taylor of Warwick (Non-affiliated)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 August 2026
Reference
HL2782
House
House of Lords

Antifungal resistance happens when fungal infections stop responding to antifungal medicines.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
30 July 2026
Reference
CBP-10976

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they are seeking legal advice about potential litigation risks from other international trade counterparties resulting from a future UK–EU Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement; and if so, to which departments will this be provided.

Asked by
Lord Roborough (Conservative; Crossbench)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 July 2026
Reference
HL2162
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the land use framework strengthens our commitment to maintain overall food production in England. A resilient food system requires a thriving natural environment. The vast majority of agricultural land will continue to prioritise resilient food production alongside nature and climate benefits. The framework sets out how we can use land more efficiently, using a mixture of productivity improvements, multifunctional land use and the safeguarding of our most important agricultural land.

Answered by
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1016
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as the Minister is aware, England is now the only UK nation no longer receiving direct farm payments, leaving an enormous gap to be filled between the direct farm payments and the environmental payments coming into play. In that regard, the land use framework is a wasted opportunity. There should have been a greater focus on profitability and productivity. Instead, land is being taken out of food production, with livestock losing out to greenery and rewilding. She need look no further than her own area of Cumbria and Northumbria. Will the Government put the top priority on food production and food security?

Asked by
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1016
House
House of Lords

I can absolutely reassure the noble Baroness that the land use framework makes a clear commitment to maintain overall food production in England. Analysis shows that this is achievable alongside the proposed land use changes. Also, food will be produced more sustainably from less land if we have a proper combination of multifunctional land use. We need to safeguard our most important agricultural land and look at how we improve productivity. We also know that many of the improvements that are coming through sustainable farming, such as improved soil quality, increase that productivity.

Answered by
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1016
House
House of Lords

My Lords, bearing in mind the current crisis over our defence budget and the fact that feeding our population will be as important to our nation’s survival as the efforts of our defence forces, I wonder whether the Minister considers it sensible land use planning to allow large tracts of our best agricultural land to be used for solar panels—sometimes 3,000 or 4,000 at a shot. When we have so many roofs, reservoirs and lesser-quality land available, it seems unwise, unstrategic and against all the best principles of the land use framework agenda.

Asked by
Lord Cameron of Dillington (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1016
House
House of Lords

The recent global instability has shown that we need to be more self-sufficient and strengthen our energy independence. Doing so can also help to lower costs and tackle climate change. In addition, farmers and landowners can choose to diversify their income through solar projects on their land, which can also increase the resilience of their farming businesses. I agree with the noble Lord that solar installations on rooftops and reservoirs are important, but on their own they cannot deliver the scale and capacity required to meet the nation’s needs. The land use framework demonstrates how we can safeguard our most productive agricultural land while

adapting land use to support nature recovery, climate resilience, housing and infrastructure. Expanding land use for renewable energy will not come at the expense of our best agricultural land, and solar developments will need to be located in the most appropriate places.

Answered by
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1016
House
House of Lords

My Lords, will the Minister say more about the promised reforms to the farm tenancy forum and what it will actually deliver? Tenants manage a third of England’s farmland yet have little say when landlords respond to new environmental or energy incentives. Can she confirm whether a tenant farmer commissioner, as recommended by the Rock review, remains under active consideration?

Asked by
Baroness Grender (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1017
House
House of Lords

I cannot confirm that question specifically—I would have to go back to the department and check—but I can say that the department is keen to work very closely with tenant farmers. That is why we have a tenant farming commissioner: we want to do everything we can to support more tenant farmers to become profitable and more secure.

Answered by
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1017
House
House of Lords

My Lords, can my noble friend knock this nonsense about solar development on the head, once and for all? Is it not a fact that, if you were to take all the schemes that have been proposed to develop solar energy on agricultural land, it would amount to a very small percentage of agricultural land?

Asked by
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1017
House
House of Lords

My noble friend is right that it is a very small percentage. People sometimes think that solar panels are on agricultural land when in fact they are on brownfield. A very large solar development near where I live has just been given permission; it looks like it will be built on a lot of fields but, actually, it is an old mining site and brownfield.

Answered by
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1017
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the land use framework identified the need for greater intensity and yields from our best farmland to compensate for the loss of production elsewhere. Market prices for agricultural commodities do not currently support an incentive to intensify this production and underpin our food security. Can the Minister clarify what support is given to farmers with this land through ELMS to meet the Government’s goals and enhance our food security? I declare my interest as a farmer.

Asked by
Lord Roborough (Conservative; Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1017
House
House of Lords

The Government are supporting farmers through a number of different schemes. For example, we have committed at least £200 million through the farming innovation programme to support productivity improvements. We are also supporting skills development, farmer collaboration and adoption of innovative land management practices. There is a lot going on and a lot of options for farmers who are looking for support.

Answered by
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1017
House
House of Lords

My Lords, is the Minister aware that one of the solutions to food production and the use of land lies in the agritech sector? The sector can produce a lot of food under glass, et cetera, which will reduce the carbon footprint of imports, use less land and help provide food security.

The problem is the cost of energy, which defeats the business plan of the agritech sector. Are the Government prepared to look at this?

Asked by
Lord Grade of Yarmouth (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1017
House
House of Lords

This comes right back to the beginning: if we are to bring down energy costs, we need to be more self-sufficient in energy, and, if we are to be more self-sufficient in energy, we need to invest in renewable energies and nuclear.

Answered by
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1018
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if the vision of the land use framework is realised, 9% of utilised farmland will be removed from food production for nature restoration. We will therefore be asking British farmers to farm efficiently on the remaining land while meeting our high standards of animal welfare and environmental stewardship. Does the Minister agree that it is both economically and ethically important that imported food meets equivalent standards? If so, what consideration have the Government given to establishing core welfare and environmental standards for imports so that we do not simply offshore the environmental costs of food production?

Asked by
Bishop of Hereford (Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation))
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1018
House
House of Lords

The right reverend Prelate makes a really important point. In our trade agreements, we have been very clear that we will not have food that is produced to lower standards than those in this country. That has always been a red line for Defra during trade agreements. That will continue. The environmental aspects are also really important, because there is no point in us increasing our standards if that gap is then filled with lower standards. I am certainly very keen to continue to promote this within Defra.

Answered by
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1018
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare my interest as a tenant farmer. I am pleased that the Minister recognises that any strategy for multifunctional land must include strong protections for tenant farmers. That is because tenure will impact on how a farm business can engage in land use change. Currently, the design of agri-environment schemes can result in perverse incentives for landlords, including the end of tenancies. We must also ensure that government policy does not incentivise landlords to remove farming tenants in favour of solar developments, as the noble Lord, Lord Cameron, alluded to, which would undermine farming businesses and domestic food security. Has the department done any assessment on how the land use framework will impact the tenant farmers who are responsible for managing and farming 32% of England’s agricultural land, often in areas that the land use framework views as having high potential for change?

Asked by
Baroness Rock (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1018
House
House of Lords

The land use framework will work in tandem with the farming road map, which very much recognises the important role that tenants play and the support that they need. One of the things we also need to really work with is looking at lengths of tenancy. Years ago they were 20 or 25 years long, and now they are down to five years. It is much more difficult for tenants to invest and look forward to a profitable future when they have such short tenancies. That is absolutely key to recognising many of the challenges faced by tenant farmers.

Answered by
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1018
House
House of Lords