Skip to main content

1-20 of 87 results for subject:Amphetamines

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Hanson of Flint
Answering member
Lord Davies of Gower
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Notes
Debated with motion to approve the Controlled Drugs (Drug Precursors) (Amendment and Revocation) Regulations 2026.
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
855 cc640-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving this instrument I will speak also to the Controlled Drugs (Drug Precursors) (Amendment and Revocation) Regulations 2026, both of which were laid before the House on 26 February. For ease of discussion, if the House will allow me, I will refer to the first of these...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
855 cc640-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the basic idea that the list of controlled drug precursor chemicals should be in sync across the UK and with international agreements that we have signed up to is a clear and reasonable one. More complicated is the process by which we have got here. It is also...

Member
Baroness Janke (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
855 cc642-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for setting out these two draft instruments, which together update the framework governing drug precursor chemicals. On these Benches, we support the objectives of these measures. Drug precursors play a critical role in the illicit manufacture of controlled substances, and it is right that...

Member
Lord Davies of Gower (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
855 c644
House
House of Lords

I am grateful for the comments that have been made and I understand the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee’s concerns. I hope that the noble Baroness will forgive me if I say that the Government came into office in July 2024 and, as soon as we identified the challenges posed in...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
855 cc644-5
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how much amphetamine by (a) volume and (b) value has been seized in the UK over the last 12 months.

Asked by
John Hayes (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
50054
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That the draft Drug Driving (Specified Limits) (England and Wales) (Amendment) Regulations 2015, which were laid before this House on 5 February, be approved.

The instrument will include amphetamine, with a limit of 250 micrograms per litre of blood, in the new drug-driving offence of driving with a...

Member
Robert Goodwill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2015
Reference
594 cc561-3
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to follow the Minister on this subject. He and I may have a sense that, if not groundhog day, it is perhaps groundhog piglet day because—he alluded to this—we discussed the closely related draft Crime and Courts Act 2013 (Consequential Amendments) Order 2015 only last Monday....

Member
Gordon Marsden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2015
Reference
594 cc563-4
House
House of Commons

I served on the Committee that considered the related order. I should like to put on record my appreciation to successive Governments for legislation that has resulted in the number of deaths on our roads being today approximately one third what it was 50 years ago. The regulations are a...

Member
Bob Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2015
Reference
594 cc564-5
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Member for Blackpool South (Mr Marsden) for raising several questions, some of which we covered in Committee last week. He asked why we did not re-consult on the level. Although we decided that 50 micrograms was not the correct limit at the end of March 2014,...

Member
Robert Goodwill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2015
Reference
594 c565
House
House of Commons

I want to make a point about notices on prescription drugs. Many years ago, the message that cigarettes were harmful to health would have been smaller and much less obvious than it became. That seems to apply now to prescription drugs. Does the Minister have a view on whether the...

Member
Steve Brine (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2015
Reference
594 c565
House
House of Commons

We have issued specific advice to pharmacists on the nine drugs we are specifying, but there is a general warning to patients as well that taking prescription drugs can affect them. In the case of the

drugs specified in the regulations, we have issued stickers to pharmacists and doctors to...

Member
Robert Goodwill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2015
Reference
594 cc565-6
House
House of Commons

Motion that the draft Drug Driving (Specified Limits) (England and Wales) (Amendment) Regulations 2015, which were laid before this House on 5 February, be approved. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Robert Goodwill
Answering member
Gordon Marsden
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
16 March 2015
Reference
594 cc565-6
House
House of Commons

My Lords, this instrument is being made to include amphetamine with a limit of 250 micrograms per litre of blood in the new drug-driving offence of driving with a specified drug in the body above a specified limit. The new offence was made in the Crime and Courts Act 2013,...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2015
Reference
760 cc223-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, all of us will welcome these new regulations, which my noble friend presents. We know already that there are two patterns; the first is that of those who have been prescribed amphetamine medically, whose level will almost certainly be under 200 micrograms per litre of blood tested; the...

Member
Earl of Dundee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2015
Reference
760 c225GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for her explanation of the order, which specifies amphetamine as a controlled drug for the purposes of drug-driving and sets a limit above which it will be an offence to drive. We support the order but I have one or two questions about the Explanatory Memorandum—which,...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2015
Reference
760 cc225-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister gave a very interesting outline to the order and, as usual, the noble Lord, Lord Rosser, asked some very interesting questions. I do not intend to ask any further questions but, purely out of academic interest, it may amuse the Minister to learn that last week...

Member
Viscount Simon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2015
Reference
760 c227GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, thank you very much. I shall talk through the questions in reverse order, with the latest being freshest in my mind. I can say to the noble Viscount, Lord Simon, that the cost of these screening devices is around £16 or £17—obviously there is some variation in price....

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2015
Reference
760 cc227-8GC
House
House of Lords

My point was that if the conclusion was reached in September 2014 or shortly afterwards that there was no need for a third formal consultation, why have we waited until now to have this order? The second consultation was apparently conducted between 17 December 2013 and 3 January 2014, in...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2015
Reference
760 c228GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord, Lord Rosser, asked why we were not at 50 rather than 250 micrograms, what risk there is because we are going with the higher limit and how we got there. Having consulted on these issues twice, it became very evident that there were complex issues involved in...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2015
Reference
760 c229GC
House
House of Lords