1-20 of 15,266 results for subject:Army
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.503 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.022 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Army
- We searched for
- subject_t:Army OR subject_t:"British Army" OR subject_t:Soldiers OR subject_ses:90253
Type
House
Session
More
Year
More
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, on what dates vessels of the a) British Army b) Royal Navy c) Royal Air Force visited New Zealand since 1 January 2020.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, on what dates vessels of the a) British Army b) Royal Navy c) Royal Air Force visited New Zealand since 1 January 2020.
Vessels from the Royal Navy visited New Zealand on the below dates.
Date | Place | Vessel |
10–19 May 2023 | Auckland | HMS SPEY |
20–23 May 2023 | Wellington | HMS SPEY |
19–22 Feb 2024 | Auckland | HMS TAMAR |
25–29 Feb 2024 | Devonport | HMS TAMAR |
7–11 Mar 2024 | Auckland | HMS TAMAR |
22–28 Aug 2024 | Wellington | HMS TAMAR |
30 Aug–2 Sep 2024 | Devonport | HMS TAMAR |
12–28 Sep 2024 | Devonport | HMS TAMAR |
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what percentage of the British Army’s regular forces are undeployable or medically downgraded.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what percentage of the British Army’s regular forces are undeployable or medically downgraded.
At 1 April 2026 (most recently available data) 10.5% of UK full time trade trained army personnel were graded Medically Limited Deployable (MLD). Personnel graded as MND are not fit to deploy on Operations, they may be deployable on UK based exercises and should be able to work effectively for at least 32.5 hours per week. Personnel graded MND may require continued medical care, long term medication and access to secondary care facilities.
14.3% of personnel were graded Medically Limited Deployable (MLD). Personnel with a grade of MLD are medically fit for duty with minor employment limitations. A grade of MLD requires a medical risk assessment to be carried out for deployment. The decision on that deployment will depend on the medical condition, individual function, the proposed employment, length of the deployment and the medical support available. As such, it should not be assumed that only those personnel graded Medically Fully Deployable are able to deploy.
This response presents Medical Deployability Standard (MDS) for all full-time trade trained army personnel, including Gurkhas and reservists.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to page 40 of the DIP, what metric he plans to use to test the lethality of the Army.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to page 40 of the DIP, what metric he plans to use to test the lethality of the Army.
The Defence Investment Plan sets out the ambition for the British Army to become ten times more lethal by 2035. This increase in lethality is not a single moment but a trajectory, assessed through the Army's ability to generate combat effects faster and more effectively than potential adversaries.
Progress is tracked against Army Command Plan milestones that reflect the transformation of fighting power. This approach, supported by investments in systems such as Project ASGARD, Challenger 3, and RCH-155, ensures the Army delivers a more lethal, tech-enabled force capable of deterring threats and defending the UK and NATO territory.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to page 40 of his Department's document entitled Defence Investment plan, published 30 June 2026, if he will set out what steps the Army is taking to integrate drone capabilities at all levels.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to page 40 of his Department's document entitled Defence Investment plan, published 30 June 2026, if he will set out what steps the Army is taking to integrate drone capabilities at all levels.
The Army is integrating drones at all levels as part of its 5th Generation Land Forces transition. This includes the delivery of uncrewed capabilities from the tactical to the strategic level, integrated into a coherent force design rather than fielded as standalone systems.
In line with the Army’s 20:40:40 force design construct, capabilities will include high-volume, low-cost consumable drones that can be rapidly replaced, alongside more sophisticated attritable uncrewed systems whose loss is acceptable without jeopardising mission success. These capabilities will be integrated with survivable crewed platforms that command and exploit the capabilities of the wider force. Investing in the new force design construct will enhance the Army’s ability to sense, strike and manoeuvre at greater scale, speed, and persistence.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what is the capability requirement of the £400 million of the Land Lethality Pipeline.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what is the capability requirement of the £400 million of the Land Lethality Pipeline.
The Land Lethality Pipeline intends to provide Land Forces with uncrewed surveillance, reconnaissance and strike capabilities enabling them to conduct layered find-and-strike operations as part of modern combined arms warfare. These capabilities will include reconnaissance Uncrewed Aerial Systems (UAS), strike drones, dropper drones and loitering munitions.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what is the full scope of Project IRIS.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what is the full scope of Project IRIS.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave him on 9 September 2025, to Question 73563 which remains extant.
https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2025-08-29/73563
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what is the estimated procurement time on Taskforce RAPSTONE compared to normal MOD procurement timescales.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what is the estimated procurement time on Taskforce RAPSTONE compared to normal MOD procurement timescales.
The Defence Investment Plan has provisioned £400 million to the Land Lethality Pipeline, which includes a £50 million boost to the Army’s RAPSTONE rapid lethality programme over the next twelve months. This boost will enable Taskforce RAPSTONE to deliver important projects by drawing on the lessons learned from Ukraine to accelerate the fielding of new capabilities into the British Army.
Whilst procurement timelines vary, Taskforce RAPSTONE aims to deliver capabilities into the hands of the user as a Minimum Deployable Capability (MDC) within six to 12 months.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much of the £400m committed to Taskforce RAPSTONE has been spent to date.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much of the £400m committed to Taskforce RAPSTONE has been spent to date.
The Defence Investment Plan has provisioned £400 million to the Land Lethality Pipeline, which includes a £50 million boost to the Army’s RAPSTONE rapid lethality programme over the next twelve months. This boost will enable Taskforce RAPSTONE to deliver important projects by drawing on the lessons learned from Ukraine to accelerate the fielding of new capabilities into the British Army.
Whilst procurement timelines vary, Taskforce RAPSTONE aims to deliver capabilities into the hands of the user as a Minimum Deployable Capability (MDC) within six to 12 months.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, when uncrewed systems will start operating at British Army Training Unit Suffield.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, when uncrewed systems will start operating at British Army Training Unit Suffield.
Uncrewed systems are currently operating at British Army Training Unit Suffield. The site also supports the testing and evaluation of these systems across its 2,700 km² training area. As outlined in the Defence Investment Plan, future investment will better exploit the site's unique scale and freedom of manoeuvre, supporting the accelerated development and delivery of uncrewed systems capability.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to page 27 of the Defence Investment Plan, published on 30 June 2026, what steps he plans to take to exploit the (a) size, (b) scale, and (c) freedom of the British Army Training Unit Suffield.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to page 27 of the Defence Investment Plan, published on 30 June 2026, what steps he plans to take to exploit the (a) size, (b) scale, and (c) freedom of the British Army Training Unit Suffield.
The British Army is refocusing the British Army Training Unit Suffield (BATUS) to support training and experimentation with robotic and autonomous systems, counter-uncrewed aerial systems, and other enabling capabilities across its 2,700 km² training area, reflecting lessons learned from Ukraine.
BATUS provides a unique environment in which to train and test against realistic threats, including through greater freedom to operate at scale across speed, height and electromagnetic spectrum parameters. This enables the Army to develop and evaluate emerging approaches to warfare, including the integration of uncrewed systems, electronic warfare, loitering munitions and counter-uncrewed aerial systems in a contested environment.
As outlined in the Defence Investment Plan, future investment will make greater use of the site's size, scale and freedom of manoeuvre, supporting the accelerated development and delivery of uncrewed systems capability.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the full scope is of Project Wavell.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the full scope is of Project Wavell.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave him on 14 July 2025, to Question 65663:
Project Wavell is the Army’s means to deliver force development transformation to 2030 and beyond towards an Army designed and organised for high-intensity warfighting. This is being implemented through an incremental approach that sequences delivery against the changing operational demand.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps the Army is taking to support allies and partners, including in the Middle East, Indo-Pacific, South America and Africa.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps the Army is taking to support allies and partners, including in the Middle East, Indo-Pacific, South America and Africa.
The Strategic Defence Review and Defence Diplomacy Strategy set out the importance of maintaining and deepening our alliances and partnerships. The Ministry of Defence is taking a more deliberate, targeted and coherent approach to its international relationships with a range of allies and partners, enabling us to build world-beating capabilities, rally international support to our priorities, pursue export opportunities and strengthen our hand in competition with adversaries.
In the Middle East, our relationships are enabled through our persistent military footprint in the region, temporary deployments, security assurances, and increased joint capability development. We also advocate for increased burden sharing and intelligence exchanges with regional partners.
In the Indo-Pacific, we are focusing on capability and technology collaboration, military training and exercises, and intelligence sharing with key partners, including making the most of our membership of the Five Power Defence Arrangements, while seeking to maintain a persistent military presence.
In Africa, our support to partners promotes peace and stability and addresses upstream threats to UK and our allies’ interests. This includes deployments in Kenya and Somalia, support to UN missions and episodic tri-service deployments across the continent to conduct joint training and capability development activity.
In South America, we maintain our relationships with regional partners and allies through military co-operation and a persistent military forward presence. We have permanent deployments in the South Atlantic through British Forces South Atlantic Islands where we have two overseas bases (in the Falkland Islands and Ascension).
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to the Defence Investment Plan, published on 30 June 2026, page 26, what is the full scope of the land lethality pipeline programme.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to the Defence Investment Plan, published on 30 June 2026, page 26, what is the full scope of the land lethality pipeline programme.
The Defence Investment Plan commits £400 million to deliver a suite of inexpensive, expendable autonomous systems and weapons to rapidly enhance the lethality of the Army, Commando Force and Special Forces.
The Land Lethality Pipeline will be focused on delivering rapidly increased lethality in the range bracket of approximately 0-100km. This could include the types of capabilities commonly seen in use in Ukraine (e.g. radio controlled First-Person View drones, fibre optic First-Person View drones, 'dropper drones,' and beyond line-of-sight missile systems), as well as more novel emerging technologies and protection such as counter drone defences). The precise nature and balance of these options will be announced at a future date.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what is the difference between the former Field Army Headquarters and the new single Army Headquarters.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what is the difference between the former Field Army Headquarters and the new single Army Headquarters.
As part of the ongoing Army Reform programme, the former Field Army Headquarters, which was responsible for the generation, preparation and employment of Land Forces, has been merged with Army Headquarters to form a single unified command. This streamlined headquarters connects operational demand, warfighting development and force design, ensuring that the Army’s structures, capabilities and resources are driven by the missions it must deliver for NATO, Defence, and the Nation. More than just a structural change, the new headquarters clearly links operational design with force design, supports faster capability integration, reduces duplication, and strengthens the Land Forces’ warfighting readiness. This critical shift in structure positions the Army to deliver the Defence Investment Plan at pace.
Motion that this House recognises the danger that Russia's renewed illegal invasion of Ukraine poses to European and British security; further recognises the threat to the international order and the UK posed by China; also recognises the increasing uncertainty surrounding the reliability of the US as an ally within NATO; acknowledges the current shortfalls in the UK’s ability to deploy a credible fighting force; further acknowledges that this lack of military capability is resulting in the coercion of Britain and its interests in the international sphere; and calls on the Government to begin a programme of rapid rearmament to strengthen the defence of the UK and its allies. Agreed to on question.
Motion that this House recognises the danger that Russia's renewed illegal invasion of Ukraine poses to European and British security; further recognises the threat to the international order and the UK posed by China; also recognises the increasing uncertainty surrounding the reliability of the US as an ally within NATO;...
I beg to move,
That this House recognises the danger that Russia’s renewed illegal invasion of Ukraine poses to European and British security; further recognises the threat to the international order and the UK posed by China; also recognises the increasing uncertainty surrounding the reliability of the US as an ally...
I beg to move,
That this House recognises the danger that Russia’s renewed illegal invasion of Ukraine poses to European and British security; further recognises the threat to the international order and the UK posed by China; also recognises the increasing uncertainty surrounding the reliability of the US as an ally...
The hon. Gentleman is making an excellent speech. The first four years—the near-term investment period—covers the period until the next election. The second half—the longer-term investment period—covers the next five years, all the way up to 2035. However, the DIP is a 10-year plan, so it should in fact go...
The hon. Gentleman is making an excellent speech. The first four years—the near-term investment period—covers the period until the next election. The second half—the longer-term investment period—covers the next five years, all the way up to 2035. However, the DIP is a 10-year plan, so it should in fact go...
This actually speaks to the delay. Had the DIP come out when it was meant to, in 2025, it would have been a 10-year plan, because it would have gone from 2025 to 2035. However, the Government were unable to get their ducks in a row and the DIP was...
This actually speaks to the delay. Had the DIP come out when it was meant to, in 2025, it would have been a 10-year plan, because it would have gone from 2025 to 2035. However, the Government were unable to get their ducks in a row and the DIP was...
My concern is that the only British company offering to build an advanced jet trainer replacement for the Red Arrows Hawk jet, AERALIS, has gone into receivership because of the delay in the DIP, which means it will not assemble those lovely British jets in my constituency.
My concern is that the only British company offering to build an advanced jet trainer replacement for the Red Arrows Hawk jet, AERALIS, has gone into receivership because of the delay in the DIP, which means it will not assemble those lovely British jets in my constituency.
I think we have all heard stories of firms such as the one in the hon. Gentleman’s constituency, whether in our own constituencies or in the conversations we have as Members of Parliament who are interested in defence. It has been catastrophic for British industry, and rushing out an unfunded...
I think we have all heard stories of firms such as the one in the hon. Gentleman’s constituency, whether in our own constituencies or in the conversations we have as Members of Parliament who are interested in defence. It has been catastrophic for British industry, and rushing out an unfunded...