Skip to main content

1-20 of 387 results for subject:Assembly

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Lord Rooker on 10 January (WA 101) concerning the votes of deceased Members in the Northern Ireland Assembly, who can exercise such a vote where the deceased Member was the only representative of his or her party.

Asked by
Lord Laird (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 February 2007
Reference
1345; 689 c128WA
House
House of Lords

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Lord Rooker on 13 December (WA 213) concerning a police presence at Stormont Parliament buildings, who took the decision not to have police at the current sittings of the transitional Northern Ireland Assembly.

Asked by
Lord Laird (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 January 2007
Reference
920; 688 c106WA
House
House of Lords

Agreement at St. Andrews. [Agreement reached between 11th and 13th October 2006 in St. Andrews between British and Irish governments on the restoration of the political institutions of Northern Ireland]. 18 p.

Deposited by
Northern Ireland Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
16 October 2006
Reference
DEP 06/1837
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (Peter Hain) has made the following Ministerial Statement. On 15 May, Members of the Northern Ireland Assembly were recalled to participate in a process to secure the full restoration of the institutions in Northern Ireland on or before 24...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Department
Northern Ireland Office
Type
Written statements
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c153-4WS
House
House of Lords

The Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (Mr. Peter Hain): On 15 May, members of the Northern Ireland Assembly were recalled to participate in a process to secure the full restoration of the institutions in Northern Ireland on or before 24 November. The Assembly rose on 7 July for summer...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Department
Northern Ireland Office
Type
Written statements
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
449 c85-6WS
House
House of Commons

I. Statement by the Prime Minister and the Taoiseach made at Stormont on 29th June 2006. II. The Northern Ireland political process: workplan. III. Dear colleague letter from Clare Salters, Northern Ireland Office, to Members of the Legislative Assembly regarding arrangements if the Northern Ireland Assembly is not restored before...

Deposited by
Northern Ireland Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
DEP 06/1439
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Does the Secretary of State agree that the Northern Ireland parties are now faced with a choice? Is the security situation so bad that they hold out against restarting the Assembly, or is it sufficiently good to justify their participation in a functioning Assembly on a cross-party basis? Does he accept that the difficult but necessary choice is whether to hold out on principle against restarting the Assembly, thereby losing out on everything from the changes in education policy that we have just debated right through to the redrawing of local government boundaries and billing for utilities? Does he further accept that that choice is entirely in the hands of Northern Ireland politicians?
Asked by
Lembit Opik (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Northern Ireland Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c248
House
House of Commons

Standing Orders of the Northern Ireland Assembly determined under paragraph 4 (1) of schedule 1 to the Northern Ireland Act 2006.

Deposited by
Northern Ireland Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
11 May 2006
Reference
DEP 06/1007
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Type
Public acts
Date
8 May 2006
Reference
CHAP 17 2006

Northern Ireland Bill. Lords Committee stage. Clauses 1 to 6 agreed to. Schedules 1 to 3 agreed to. Bill reported without amendment.

Department
Northern Ireland Office
Type
Committee of the Whole House (HL); Debates on bills
Date
8 May 2006
Reference
681 c717-33
House
House of Lords

I have to confess that I am not one of the most optimistic people as regards what will happen after this Bill is enacted. There are still some very grave doubts about the sincerity of some of the politicians involved, particularly their attachment to the process of law and order, and their...

Member
Lord Tebbit (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2006
Reference
681 c729
House
House of Lords

I have a great deal of sympathy with the words of the noble Baroness, but I am afraid that I do not think that the amendment to this Bill at this time will help procedures in the Northern Ireland Assembly when it reassembles. I would love to pass the buck today, as I am sure...

Member
Lord Glentoran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2006
Reference
681 c729
House
House of Lords

I add a few words to those spoken with very good sense and great understanding by the noble Baroness, Lady Park. I have considerable sympathy with this amendment in that, however robust the Minister intends to be about moving matters forward, it would be absolute and utter folly to attempt to make major...

Member
Lord Maginnis of Drumglass (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2006
Reference
681 c730
House
House of Lords

I would only add what I said when we discussed the Bill before. I feel great sympathy with the amendment. It is unlikely to encourage people in Northern Ireland to rule themselves and to get on with it if the Government meanwhile enact such decisions as those made on education, which were discussed...

Member
Baroness Park of Monmouth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2006
Reference
681 c729-30
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the Minister for giving way. I find what he has said wholly persuasive.

Member
Lord Tebbit (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2006
Reference
681 c733
House
House of Lords

I accept the invitation of the noble Lord, Lord Tebbit, to express sympathy with the principle behind the amendment. The Government’s view is that the present situation is unsatisfactory for scrutinising Northern Ireland legislation. On two occasions in the past 12 months we have talked with the other parties to see what ideas we...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2006
Reference
681 c730-3
House
House of Lords

I rest my case.

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2006
Reference
681 c733
House
House of Lords

We are content that the clause stands part in the light of the Minister’s assurances. Clause 3 agreed to. Clauses 4 to 6 agreed to. Schedule 1 [The Assembly]: [Amendment No. 2 not moved.]

Member
Lord Smith of Clifton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2006
Reference
681 c726
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. *5:"Page 5, line 20, at end insert—""““Assembly control of Orders in Council""7  For paragraph 2 of the Schedule to the 2000 Act substitute—""““Parliamentary and Assembly control of Orders in Council" 2   (1) Except where sub-paragraph (2) applies, an Order in Council may not be made under paragraph 1(1) unless each of the following conditions is...

Member
Baroness Harris of Richmond (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2006
Reference
681 c726-9
House
House of Lords

had given notice of his intention to move Amendment No. 3:"Page 5, line 10, at end insert ““but in any such provision the number of members of the Assembly of a party shall be determined as that obtaining on the morning of the day for the making of the nominations referred to in...

Member
Lord Maginnis of Drumglass (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2006
Reference
681 c726
House
House of Lords