1-18 of 18 results for subject:Autonomy
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.226 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.002 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Autonomy
- We searched for
- subject_t:Autonomy OR subject_ses:2920
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
I. Draft agreement on the Independence of the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA)(draft). 3p. II. Letter dated 26/11/2021 from Lord Callanan to all Peers regarding a document for deposit in the House Library. 1p.
I. Draft agreement on the Independence of the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA)(draft). 3p. II. Letter dated 26/11/2021 from Lord Callanan to all Peers regarding a document for deposit in the House Library. 1p.
To ask Her Majesty's Government who were the ultimate beneficial recipients of (1) the £15 million fine and £5,635,014 costs levied by the Financial Reporting Council on Deloitte on 17 September in respect of audit failures at Autonomy Corporation Plc, and (2) the £500,000 and £250,000 fines levied upon two Deloitte...
To ask Her Majesty's Government who were the ultimate beneficial recipients of (1) the £15 million fine and £5,635,014 costs levied by the Financial Reporting Council on Deloitte on 17 September in respect of audit failures at Autonomy Corporation Plc, and (2) the £500,000 and £250,000 fines levied upon two Deloitte...
The three fines in the enforcement case relating to Autonomy Corporation plc were imposed under the Financial Reporting Council’s (FRC’s) Accountancy Scheme. Since 2016, a new Audit Enforcement Procedure has been implemented under the Statutory Auditors and Third Country Auditors Regulations 2016 for investigations of possible breaches of relevant requirements by statutory auditors under those Regulations.
The investigation into Autonomy Corporation plc started before those regulations came into force. Under the Accountancy Scheme the fines must be passed to the participating body which is required to fund the legal costs of the case. Additionally, any costs awarded by the tribunal in recognition of the costs funded by the participating body must also be paid to that body. In this case the participating body was the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
Fines imposed by the FRC under the Audit Enforcement Procedure must be paid to the Secretary of State and the Exchequer. Any costs awarded to the FRC in recognition of the costs funded by one of the recognised audit supervisory bodies must continue to be paid to that body.
Mr Deputy Speaker, while Members make their way out of the Chamber, I will take this opportunity to congratulate you on being the man who effectively announced our departure from the European Union. Your place in history is assured.
Since we agreed the UK-US extradition treaty in 2003, it has been...
Mr Deputy Speaker, while Members make their way out of the Chamber, I will take this opportunity to congratulate you on being the man who effectively announced our departure from the European Union. Your place in history is assured.
Since we agreed the UK-US extradition treaty in 2003, it has been...
I should state that Dr Lynch is my constituent, so I take a keen interest here.
Does my right hon. Friend agree that back in 2003 when the treaty first came in—I was not in the House then, but he was—we were sold it very much on the basis that it...
I should state that Dr Lynch is my constituent, so I take a keen interest here.
Does my right hon. Friend agree that back in 2003 when the treaty first came in—I was not in the House then, but he was—we were sold it very much on the basis that it...
My right hon. Friend is exactly right. I was the shadow Home Secretary at the time and I opposed this treaty, but eventually our party gave in on the grounds that it was about paedophilia and terrorism and violent crime. That was the sole basis upon which we accepted what...
My right hon. Friend is exactly right. I was the shadow Home Secretary at the time and I opposed this treaty, but eventually our party gave in on the grounds that it was about paedophilia and terrorism and violent crime. That was the sole basis upon which we accepted what...
May I start by congratulating my right hon. Friend the Member for Haltemprice and Howden (Mr Davis) on securing this debate? He has long been a sentinel on the watchtower of our liberties, and we are all the safer for having him in his place.
I am sure my right hon....
May I start by congratulating my right hon. Friend the Member for Haltemprice and Howden (Mr Davis) on securing this debate? He has long been a sentinel on the watchtower of our liberties, and we are all the safer for having him in his place.
I am sure my right hon....
Agreed to on question.
Agreed to on question.
Educational excellence everywhere. Incl. annex. 128p.
Educational excellence everywhere. Incl. annex. 128p.
To ask the Attorney-General whether the Serious Fraud Office has decided to investigate the sale of Autonomy or refer the case to another law enforcement agency.
[148368]
To ask the Attorney-General whether the Serious Fraud Office has decided to investigate the sale of Autonomy or refer the case to another law enforcement agency.
[148368]
Allegations have been made to the SFO about the circumstances of the sale in 2011 of autonomy to Hewlett Packard. The Director of the Serious Fraud Office has decided to open an investigation into these allegations, with a view to using his powers of investigation to allow them to be tested.
To ask the Attorney-General on what date the Serious Fraud Office (a) opened an investigation into the sale of Autonomy, (b) became aware of a possible conflict of interest in conducting that investigation and (c) initiated internal enquiries into that possible conflict of interest.
[148370]
To ask the Attorney-General on what date the Serious Fraud Office (a) opened an investigation into the sale of Autonomy, (b) became aware of a possible conflict of interest in conducting that investigation and (c) initiated internal enquiries into that possible conflict of interest.
[148370]
The SFO has always been aware of the risk of conflict or perception of conflict in this case. It has, from the outset, kept the issue under careful-review, and it will continue to do so as the investigation develops. The Director accepted the case for investigation on 31 January 2013.
To ask the Attorney-General whether any agencies under his superintendency (a) have active contracts and (b) had contracts at any stage since 2010 with Autonomy Systems Ltd.
[141528]
To ask the Attorney-General whether any agencies under his superintendency (a) have active contracts and (b) had contracts at any stage since 2010 with Autonomy Systems Ltd.
[141528]
Apart from the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) none of the Law Officers' Departments have had any contracts with Autonomy Systems Ltd since 2010.
The SFO entered into a contract with Autonomy Systems Limited on 19 June 2009 for an initial period of five years extendable by a further two years, this was extended in June 2011.
To ask the Attorney-General what the value is of the Serious Fraud Office's contract with Autonomy Systems Ltd.
[141530]
To ask the Attorney-General what the value is of the Serious Fraud Office's contract with Autonomy Systems Ltd.
[141530]
The Serious Fraud Office's contract with Autonomy Systems Limited was awarded on 19 June 2009 for an initial period of five years, extendable by a further two years. In June 2011, the additional two years were taken up and an amendment was made for support, maintenance and licence options, resulting in a contract value of £4,648,689 to June 2016, or £664,098 per annum. Additional services procured under this contract to date, amount to £144,450.
To ask the Attorney-General whether the Serious Fraud Office is carrying out a criminal investigation into the company Autonomy.
[139581]
To ask the Attorney-General whether the Serious Fraud Office is carrying out a criminal investigation into the company Autonomy.
[139581]
As and when matters are brought to the attention of the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) they are assessed in the context of the SFO's remit to investigate fraud, bribery and corruption. If appropriate, relevant matters will be considered for criminal investigation in line with SFO internal procedures. The SFO does not comment on its assessments or their status at any one time but does publish on its website details of those cases formally adopted for criminal investigation, whenever this is possible without prejudice to the investigation.
To ask the Attorney-General whether Autonomy has entered into any contracts with the Serious Fraud Office at any time since 2010.
[139547]
To ask the Attorney-General whether Autonomy has entered into any contracts with the Serious Fraud Office at any time since 2010.
[139547]
A number of law enforcement agencies including the SFO use Autonomy software and have entered into contracts with Autonomy Systems Ltd.
The SFO entered into a contract with Autonomy Systems Ltd on 1 June 2009 for an initial period of five years extendable by a further two years, this was extended in June 2011.
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills what assessment he has made of the effect of the acquisition of Autonomy by Hewlett-Packard on the privacy and security of UK public and private organisations and their data.
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills what assessment he has made of the effect of the acquisition of Autonomy by Hewlett-Packard on the privacy and security of UK public and private organisations and their data.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, which police authorities have contracts with Autonomy plc.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, which police authorities have contracts with Autonomy plc.
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, what contracts for which her Department is responsible have been awarded to Autonomy plc. - The Department has not directly awarded any contracts to Autonomy plc.
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, what contracts for which her Department is responsible have been awarded to Autonomy plc. - The Department has not directly awarded any contracts to Autonomy plc.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what contracts for which his Department is responsible have been awarded to Autonomy plc.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what contracts for which his Department is responsible have been awarded to Autonomy plc.