Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,033 results for subject:Backbenchers

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Does the Prime Minister think it is acceptable for a Back-Bench MP to suggest that the Leader of the Opposition represents “white supremacy in blackface” and is

“the most prominent member of white supremacy’s black collaborator class”,

with all the race traitor innuendo that that carries? If he does not, why has he not removed the Whip?

Asked by
Ben Obese-Jecty (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
6 November 2024
Reference
756 c301
House
House of Commons

No, I do not.

Answered by
Keir Starmer (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
6 November 2024
Reference
756 c301
House
House of Commons

Lords motion to agree the seventh report of the Procedure and Privileges Committee on Amendments to motions; Terms of reference of the International Agreements Committee (HL 265 2022-23). Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Gardiner of Kimble
Department
Senior Deputy Speaker (HL); Procedure and Privileges Committee
Type
Debates on select committee reports
Notes
Debated with motion to agree the first report of the Procedure and Privileges Committee on Oral questions to Secretaries of State and oral statements by Secretaries of State.
Date
28 November 2023
Reference
834 cc1021-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will also speak to the second Motion in my name on the Order Paper.

The seventh report sets out various proposed changes to procedures on Motions and amendments to Motions. The genesis of these changes was a letter from the Leader of the House and the Government Chief...

Member
Lord Gardiner of Kimble (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 November 2023
Reference
834 cc1022-4
House
House of Lords

Can I just clarify something about the Foreign Secretary section? Given that Northern Ireland is now a foreign country in terms of aspects of trade, will he be responsible for answering questions to do with anything to do with the protocol, the Windsor Framework and Northern Ireland?

Member
Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 November 2023
Reference
834 c1023
House
House of Lords

My Lords, when I came into this Chamber, I always thought that Northern Ireland was part of the United Kingdom, and my personal preference is that it will always remain so. Others rather than the Foreign Secretary will answer questions relating to Northern Ireland.

Member
Lord Gardiner of Kimble (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 November 2023
Reference
834 c1023
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Baroness asked a very mischievous question and she knew very well she was doing so. Many of us will welcome the comments in the first report about the length of speeches—

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 November 2023
Reference
834 c1023
House
House of Lords

Oh!

Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 November 2023
Reference
834 c1023
House
House of Lords

I speak often, but not at length. I believe that it is very important indeed that we follow what the Companion says and, to add to what the Senior Deputy Speaker said, that we abandon the practice of reading supplementary questions. It should not be beyond the wit of any...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 November 2023
Reference
834 c1023
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I seek some reassurance. “Intemperate language” I understand, but “argumentative” was used as not being appropriate. It may be because I am argumentative but I think that scrutiny and the important role of this House, as it now has the responsibility of holding the Foreign Secretary to account,...

Member
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 November 2023
Reference
834 c1023
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before we hear the Senior Deputy Speaker’s response, I say that I fully support both reports. The proposals are practical and sensible and aid scrutiny. I have been in the House for more than 13 years. When I first came, we were constantly reminded about sticking to the...

Member
Lord Kennedy of Southwark (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 November 2023
Reference
834 c1023
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to all noble Lords who have contributed to the debate. I apologise for jumping in to answer the question asked by the noble Baroness, Lady Hoey, when in the spirit of things I should have waited for all the considerations from noble Lords.

The noble...

Member
Lord Gardiner of Kimble (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 November 2023
Reference
834 c1025
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Procedure and Privileges Committee
Date
26 October 2023
Reference
HL 265 2022-23
House
House of Lords

I beg to move,

That this House approves the Fourth Report of the Procedure Committee, Correcting the record, HC 521.

It is a pleasure to open this debate on proposals put forward by the Procedure Committee in its fourth report of this Session. I would like to thank the Committee and its...

Member
Penny Mordaunt (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2023
Reference
738 c796
House
House of Commons

What procedure does the Minister envisage being used where a non-Minister misleads the House or gives incorrect information, and declines to correct the record?

Member
Greg Knight (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2023
Reference
738 c796
House
House of Commons

All these matters are matters for the House. We asked the Procedure Committee to consider these matters and bring forward recommendations to the House, but it is very clear that we have a code

of conduct. Often, if a Member has not adhered to their obligations to this House, points...

Member
Penny Mordaunt (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2023
Reference
738 cc796-7
House
House of Commons

I put on record my thanks to the Procedure Committee for its report on correcting the record, and to all those inside and outside the House who contributed to that report. Any strengthening of transparency and accountability for Members is welcome, as are steps to make this easier to understand...

Member
Lucy Powell (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2023
Reference
738 c797
House
House of Commons

One of the reasons why I became an MP was to serve those I represent. Having been proudly elected in 2019, it is increasingly

clear to me that it is incumbent on all of us in this place to improve the covenant between Parliament and our constituents by ensuring that...

Member
James Sunderland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2023
Reference
738 cc797-8
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend and other members of the Procedure Committee on this excellent report. Is there not a case, when a Member or Minister corrects the record, for stating in that correction how many times in the same Session of Parliament that person has had to correct the...

Member
Greg Knight (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2023
Reference
738 c798
House
House of Commons

I agree with the thrust of what my right hon. Friend is saying, and I will come on to that in due course. However, what is important is that the record that is going to be available at a single point on a website will make it possible, very quickly...

Member
James Sunderland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2023
Reference
738 c798
House
House of Commons