Skip to main content

1-20 of 128 results for subject:BeLeave

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Deposited by
Whips Office (Lords)
Type
Deposited papers
Date
2 May 2019
Reference
DEP2019-0525
House
House of Lords

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether the Government was informed about allegations of violations of electoral law against (a) Vote Leave and BeLeave and (b) Leave.EU by (i) the police and (ii) any other public service.

Asked by
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 November 2018
Reference
187981
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered e-petition 223729 relating to rescinding Article 50 if the Vote Leave campaign broke electoral laws.

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Sir Roger.

The petition raises an issue that is clearly timely, lively and of huge interest, because almost 200,000 people...

Member
Daniel Zeichner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2018
Reference
646 cc205-6WH
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for introducing this very important debate. I speak as somebody whose constituency voted to remain; I myself also voted to remain. Can he address one point? He has mentioned, rightly, that in legal terms, the referendum was advisory and not legally binding. Therefore,...

Member
Bim Afolami (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2018
Reference
646 c206WH
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for his intervention. As I rather thought, almost immediately we start getting pulled into the legal arguments. His point is a reasonable one, but of course there are arguments back and forth, and many of these things remain to be tested in court,...

Member
Daniel Zeichner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2018
Reference
646 c207WH
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Gentleman agree that it is essential that we have clarity on where the law stands, particularly in relation to whether article 50 can be rescinded? I am not sure whether he is aware of a legal case—the Wightman case—that is going through the Scottish courts, which I...

Member
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2018
Reference
646 c207WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the right hon. Gentleman for his intervention and I very much agree; in fact, I will come on to that point a bit later. It is a very important point and, of course, it would have been helpful for all of us if the Government had pursued that...

Member
Daniel Zeichner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2018
Reference
646 c207WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend on his excellent opening speech. On the point about people attending Committees, does he agree that the social media element has an impact on the close scrutiny that we need, not just of ourselves as Members of Parliament, but of elections in general? Because it...

Member
Catherine West (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2018
Reference
646 c208WH
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for my hon. Friend’s observation. I do not think anyone would dispute the layers of complexity and difficulty, and the greater difficulty presented by social media. For some of us who have been grappling with electoral law over many years, social media makes it a whole lot...

Member
Daniel Zeichner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2018
Reference
646 c208WH
House
House of Commons

For many of my constituents, this feels like an obvious point. There has been a breach of the law and there should be a way in which those who are responsible are held to account through our legal system. The fact that a general, local or European election or a...

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2018
Reference
646 c208WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend jumps ahead a little, but entirely correctly, to my conclusions. Over the next few minutes, I will show some of the inconsistencies and the need to update our rules and laws, and I very much hope that the Minister will listen closely.

Returning to the Digital, Culture, Media...

Member
Daniel Zeichner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2018
Reference
646 cc208-210WH
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that whether or not we have another referendum on our membership of the European Union, the probable involvement of the Russians indicates that democracy in this country is at risk and that whatever action we take in this House, we should try to ensure that...

Member
Sandy Martin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2018
Reference
646 c210WH
House
House of Commons

I very much agree with my hon. Friend and near neighbour. There are so many aspects of the matter that could be explored today, some of which I suspect others will choose to pursue.

Returning to the general proposition about how these issues should be dealt with, some look to the...

Member
Daniel Zeichner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2018
Reference
646 cc210-1WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for giving way, and I apologise for the fact that I and possibly other Members will not be able to stay until the end of this debate; there is another debate about the European Union withdrawal agreement taking place in the Chamber shortly. Does he...

Member
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2018
Reference
646 c211WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the right hon. Gentleman for making those points. I quite understand that there is another, more attractive option coming up soon in the other Chamber, and I will be in no way offended if he leaves. On his point about whether there can be an independent arbiter, I...

Member
Daniel Zeichner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2018
Reference
646 c211WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is generous in giving way to me for a second time. Does he agree that if there is a referendum and the Government of the day say that they will implement whatever the people decide, there should at least be a briefing in the Library of the...

Member
Catherine West (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2018
Reference
646 c211WH
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for her suggestion. I am just remembering some bleary-eyed politicians trying to recalibrate in the middle of the night, and I am wondering how quickly such a briefing note could be produced accurately. This is a theme of what I have been saying, but I...

Member
Daniel Zeichner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2018
Reference
646 cc211-3WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to see you in the Chair, Sir Roger. I want to pay tribute to my long-standing friend, my hon. Friend the Member for Cambridge (Daniel Zeichner), for a sterling introduction to the debate on the petition. I am sure my colleagues will be pleased to know...

Member
Kerry McCarthy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2018
Reference
646 cc213-4WH
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Lady agree that if the Government want to be transparent and open, they should clearly state whether in their view article 50 is or is not revocable? As far as I am aware, the position they have adopted so far is, “The question is not being posed,...

Member
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2018
Reference
646 c214WH
House
House of Commons

I absolutely agree. We are discussing all the options available to us at the moment—from no deal to the option that some of us advocate: that we ought to think better and do all we can to try to stay in the EU. Clearly, looking at the legalities around article...

Member
Kerry McCarthy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2018
Reference
646 cc214-5WH
House
House of Commons