Skip to main content

1-20 of 56 results for subject:Bingley

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, what recent discussions he has had with Bradford Council on its progress on re-opening the swimming pool in Bingley.

Asked by
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 May 2024
Reference
26998
House
House of Commons

Go figure, as Joe Biden might say.

I congratulate my right hon. Friend on becoming Prime Minister. He is absolutely the right person for the job and I wish him every success. He knows he has my full support. His two immediate predecessors made levelling up a key part of their agenda. Will he reaffirm his commitment to levelling up and start as he means to go on by approving the levelling-up fund bid for Bingley in my constituency?

Asked by
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 October 2022
Reference
721 c289
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for his warm remarks. I can confirm that he must be the only person who texted me in the last 24 hours to say that he did not want a job. I can give him my cast-iron commitment to levelling up, particularly in Yorkshire, which he and I share. Obviously, he will know that I cannot comment on individual bids, but by the end of the year, an announcement is expected on the successful ones, and I wish him every luck with that.

Answered by
Rishi Sunak (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 October 2022
Reference
721 c289
House
House of Commons

Q4

.

Philip Davies (Shipley) (Con):

I am surprised to be asking a question, and I know you are shocked too, Mr Speaker, because I know that, like many others, you thought I would already have been offered a ministerial post.

Asked by
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 October 2022
Reference
721 cc289-292
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is as forthright as ever. He is well aware that I wrote to him last week. We are doing all that we can to ensure that the court is sold and that the proceeds are put into the Exchequer.

Answered by
Shailesh Vara (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 December 2014
Reference
589 c1262
House
House of Commons

The Minister is aware of my request that the former Keighley magistrates court in Bingley be sold off as soon as possible. The failure to do so is wasting taxpayers’ money and preventing an important town centre building in Bingley from being regenerated and brought into use. There seems to have been a lot of faffing about between the Ministry of Justice and West Yorkshire police. I urge the Minister to get on with it and get the building up for sale to allow this regeneration to take place in Bingley and to save the taxpayer some money.

Asked by
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Topical questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 December 2014
Reference
589 cc1262-1384
House
House of Commons

Aldi is ready to go ahead with the development of a new supermarket in Bingley that commands great public support. To go ahead, the development needs a land transfer from the Highways Agency via Bradford metropolitan district council. Will the Minister ensure that the Highways Agency pulls its finger out as soon as possible to make that happen so that that essential regeneration can take place in Bingley?

Asked by
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
10 July 2014
Reference
584 c433
House
House of Commons

In my experience, the Highways Agency is very good at pulling its finger out when Ministers raise issues, so I will raise this issue with the Highways Agency myself.

Answered by
Robert Goodwill (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
10 July 2014
Reference
584 c433
House
House of Commons

The people of Micklethwaite in my constituency are grateful to the Secretary of State for twice rejecting an inappropriate planning development there. Unfortunately, the Labour council has now approved a very similar development, with grave concerns from local residents about the planning process, and what appeared to be a whipped vote. Will the Secretary of State look into that to see whether he can intervene, and whether any rules can be brought in to stop repeat applications for the same site?

Asked by
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2014
Reference
583 c598
House
House of Commons

There are already rules that enable councils to resist applications that are very similar to ones that have been rejected, and it is only a shame that my hon. Friend’s local authority did not see fit to explore what possibilities are open to it.

Answered by
Nick Boles (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2014
Reference
583 c598
House
House of Commons

The Planning Minister is aware of an unacceptable planning application in Micklethwaite, in my constituency, which has already been rejected by the local council, the planning inspector and the Secretary of State, but which through legal proceedings has gone back to the Secretary of State for redetermination. A decision was expected by now. Will the Minister tell us when we can expect that decision from the Secretary of State, and, even better, confirm that he will once again reject that unacceptable proposed development?

Asked by
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
3 June 2013
Reference
563 c1230
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend has been indefatigable in his representations on the issue. He knows all too well that I cannot say anything about it, but he has made his representations here, in his constituency, in the Tea Room and almost everywhere else.

Answered by
Nick Boles (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
3 June 2013
Reference
563 c1230
House
House of Commons

A proposed housing development in Micklethwaite in my constituency was rightly rejected by Bradford council, the appeal was rightly rejected by the planning inspector and that decision was upheld by the Secretary of State. The courts have sent it back to him for redetermination. May I urge him to stick to his guns and reject that unwanted planning application? If he wants to come back to Micklethwaite to reacquaint himself with the area and see how inappropriate the application is, he will be welcomed by local residents.

Asked by
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
17 December 2012
Reference
555 c560
House
House of Commons

I know Micklethwaite well, but we will consider the matter in a quasi-judicial way. We will ensure that the views of the residents of Micklethwaite and the council are given due weight, and I hope to announce my decision in the near future.

Answered by
Lord Pickles (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 December 2012
Reference
555 c562
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend will be aware that the Secretary of State and the planning Minister act in a quasi-judicial capacity when making these decisions, so I am afraid that I cannot comment on the individual case, but I will be happy to talk with him separately to understand the background to it.

Answered by
Nick Boles (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 September 2012
Reference
550 c640
House
House of Commons

I thank the Secretary of State and the planning inspector for upholding Bradford council’s decision to reject a wholly inappropriate development in Micklethwaite in my constituency, but

will the planning Minister explain on what basis the Secretary of State, who had not visited the site, disagreed with some of the points for rejecting the developer’s appeal against the planning inspector, who had visited the site?

Asked by
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
17 September 2012
Reference
550 c639
House
House of Commons
For what reasons he has ended the Building Schools for the Future programme for Ilkley and Bingley grammar schools.
Asked by
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Education
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
12 July 2010
Reference
6956; 513 c639
House
House of Commons
The right hon. Gentleman cannot give a straight answer to a straight question. The people of Bingley and Ilkley will not be satisfied by that answer, and nor are we. Interestingly, his letter today says very clearly that his fifth list has been validated by local authorities—presumably a clear admission that the information should have been validated before the list was published in the first place, including by Bradford authority, in which the schools of Bingley and Ilkley are situated. Let me ask the right hon. Gentleman another straight question. Is it not the case that he was advised of the risk of legal challenge from private contractors, but that he personally decided to ignore that advice and take that risk with taxpayers' money? That is a very simple question. We all know that he is on shaky ground, and that he is fast losing the confidence of pupils, parents and teachers. If he had any sense, he would end this shambles, withdraw these error-strewn lists, and let our communities have new schools.
Asked by
Ed Balls (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department for Education
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
12 July 2010
Reference
513 c640-1
House
House of Commons
In the catchment areas for both Ilkley and Bingley grammar schools, there has been excessive house building, so there is no longer sufficient capacity on their existing sites to meet local demand. Can my right hon. Friend ensure that those schools that need new build to increase capacity to meet local demand will still receive capital expenditure?
Asked by
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Education
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
12 July 2010
Reference
513 c639
House
House of Commons
For parents, children and teachers in Ilkley and Bingley, the initial shock of learning that their new school building has been cancelled will have turned to outrage at the seemingly arbitrary and chaotic way in which the Secretary of State has made and announced his decisions. The right hon. Gentleman must now know that there is widespread anger in all parts of the House. Following weekend reports that he was advised by his officials not to publish a list of schools at all, I wrote to him yesterday to request answers in advance of today's oral questions. I have received a reply that does not answer any of my questions: it merely attaches a new list—list No. 5—containing 20 additional cancelled schools compared with a week ago. I shall ask the right hon. Gentleman for a straight answer to a specific question. Did he at any point receive written or oral advice from departmental officials or Partnerships for Schools urging him not to publish a list of schools until after he had consulted local authorities, to make sure that his criteria were sound and his facts were right?
Asked by
Ed Balls (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department for Education
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
12 July 2010
Reference
513 c639-40
House
House of Commons