Skip to main content

1-20 of 322 results for subject:Calderdale

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Motion that this House has considered windfarm development on protected peatland. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Robbie Moore
Answering member
Chris McDonald
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Debates
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 cc71-93WH
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered windfarm development on protected peatland.

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Sir Alec. I am glad to be introducing this incredibly important debate, which I have personally secured. It is particularly timely because, right now, Brontë country—a delicate mosaic of...

Member
Robbie Moore (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 cc71-2WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is making an excellent speech and rightly highlighting the concerns about these developments. In my constituency in the Borders, we have wind farms, battery storage proposals and solar farms. As my hon. Friend said, developers talk at length about the supposed environmental benefits, but that is no...

Member
John Lamont (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 c73WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. He makes an excellent point: the developers have failed to ascertain that the positives of the project outweigh its negative impacts, including the impact on the ability of the peatland to sequester and store carbon. That is before even considering all the negative impacts...

Member
Robbie Moore (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 cc73-4WH
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Gentleman accept that with nuclear power stations, for example, decommissioning costs are built into the cost-benefit analysis of any such projects, and yet that is not the case when wind farms are built in environmentally sensitive areas?

Member
Sammy Wilson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 c74WH
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Member makes an excellent point. He is absolutely right, because the decommissioning costs are not necessarily built into what the impact will be on our environment, our protected peat or our wildlife. I know that because the developers themselves say that once the site finishes its usage,...

Member
Robbie Moore (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 cc74-5WH
House
House of Commons

As the Member for Shipley and a neighbouring constituent, I want to make those listening aware that we have attended the debate and will shortly be giving our views on the proposals, as the hon. Member invited us to do, for which I thank him.

Member
Anna Dixon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 c75WH
House
House of Commons

Perfect intervention there, but we have had an intervention from only one of the five neighbouring Labour Members of Parliament I invited to this debate, of which only two turned up. I wrote to all those Members of Parliament—crikey, it must have been about seven months ago—inviting them to join...

Member
Robbie Moore (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 c75WH
House
House of Commons

Sir Alec, not only did I inform them today to remind them to come to this debate, I wrote to them last week inviting them to come to this debate and I wrote to them maybe six months ago asking them to join me. They are well aware that this...

Member
Robbie Moore (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 c75WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship again, Sir Alec. I thank the hon. Member for Keighley and Ilkley (Robbie Moore) for the invitation to join him in Westminster Hall today. It is always a pleasure for me to talk about the fantastic peatlands and moors in my...

Member
Anna Dixon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 cc75-6WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is giving a powerful speech. She is absolutely right that the Government are committed to helping with the rewilding and restoration of our peatland. It is probably worth noting that that is done by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, and the hon. Member for...

Member
Josh Fenton-Glynn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 c76WH
House
House of Commons

These investments are critical, and it is pleasing that the Labour Government are taking nature actions so seriously. In addition to those I mentioned, there is also the planting of sphagnum moss—which is quite tricky to pronounce.

Bradford has recently published its climate action plan 2025-28, which outlines its comprehensive approach...

Member
Anna Dixon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 c76WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Member seems to be dancing around the edges. This debate is on the matter of

“windfarm development on protected peatland”

but she has not mentioned anything to do with wind farms yet. I am keen to understand whether she is for or against the Calderdale wind farm.

Member
Robbie Moore (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 c76WH
House
House of Commons

I am just coming to that part of my speech. I will first turn to wind farms, and then I will come specifically to my views on the Calderdale wind farm, which lies largely outside of my constituency.

As well as restoring peatlands, which I have dwelled on in the first...

Member
Anna Dixon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 c77WH
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Member give way?

Member
John Lamont (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 c77WH
House
House of Commons

I will give way briefly; I was about to finish.

Member
Anna Dixon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 c77WH
House
House of Commons

I am grateful. As I said earlier in my short comments, in my constituency I am inundated with wind farms, solar farms, battery storage and data centres. I now formally object to each of them. Previously, in my life as an MSP and an MP, I did not formally object...

Member
John Lamont (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 c77WH
House
House of Commons

I am a fairly new MP, having come in in 2024. I think that the general advice given to MPs, as to the hon. Member previously, is not to get involved in formal objections. That is the approach that I have generally taken, but I have expressed views on other...

Member
Anna Dixon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 c78WH
House
House of Commons

It is an honour to serve under your chairship, Sir Alec. I thank the hon. Member for Keighley and Ilkley (Robbie Moore) for securing this vital debate. I share many of his concerns. Mid-Wales faces a wave of wind farm proposals on a scale that would transform the landscapes that...

Member
David Chadwick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 cc78-9WH
House
House of Commons

It is an honour to serve under your chairmanship, Sir Alec. I wish hon. Members a happy World Curlew Day--tan, small, slender, often up to its knees in muck and at the risk of extinction in West Yorkshire--I also congratulate the hon. Member for Keighley and Ilkley (Robbie Moore) on...

Member
Josh Fenton-Glynn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 cc79-81WH
House
House of Commons