Skip to main content

1-20 of 676 results for subject:Cambridge

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Richard Fuller
Answering member
Justin Madders
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
20 October 2026
Reference
791 cc1085-1092
House
House of Commons

Through you, Madam Deputy Speaker, I thank Mr Speaker for granting me permission to speak on a matter that is of crucial importance to my constituents. The topic of this Adjournment debate is the impact of the East West Rail Bedford to Cambridge business case on North Bedfordshire constituency. I...

Member
Richard Fuller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2026
Reference
791 cc1085-9
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Member for North Bedfordshire (Richard Fuller) for securing the debate. I have taken a note of his questions. He will be aware that I am not the Rail Minister. As he gracefully pointed out, I did not get advance notice of his questions —certainly,...

Member
Justin Madders (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2026
Reference
791 cc1089-1090
House
House of Commons

I do not think that the Minister has taken up my offer of releasing the business case tomorrow. If we go with the process that the Government are hiding behind, will the decision to go ahead by the Government, as well as the DCO from a planning point, have been...

Member
Richard Fuller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2026
Reference
791 c1091
House
House of Commons

The exact sequencing of those things is something that I would defer to the Rail Minister on, and I will get him to write to the hon. Member. It is the case that the economic benefits and the business cases are considered in tandem with those issues. Publication will be...

Member
Justin Madders (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2026
Reference
791 cc1091-2
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of declassifying First Class accommodation on Great Northern and Thameslink services serving Cambridge on passenger capacity and crowding levels during peak periods.

Asked by
Pippa Heylings (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 September 2026
Reference
27608
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if she will support plans to build a new Children’s Hospital in Cambridge.

Asked by
Blake Stephenson (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
23484
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assurances she can provide that the proposed Cambridge East development will incorporate transparent and accountable estate management arrangements and effective engagement with local residents and parish councils.

Asked by
Pippa Heylings (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
27610
House
House of Commons

The Government’s renewed commitment to devolution is welcome in Bletchley and Milton Keynes; we are eager to deepen our partnership with the neighbouring local authorities in Luton and Bedfordshire, with whom we share a strong labour market and a broader economic geography. In that vein, will the Minister meet me and parliamentary colleagues to discuss how we can create a combined authority, with a directly elected mayor, at the very heart of the Oxford-Cambridge growth corridor?

Asked by
Callum Anderson (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Topical questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
790 c659
House
House of Commons

I am always happy to meet my hon. Friend. I think that the matters in question will fall to another Minister, thankfully, but I am more than happy to join that meeting if housing issues are involved.

Answered by
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
790 c659
House
House of Commons

I welcome the Government’s plans to deepen devolution, but can the Minister reassure me that they will mean no alteration to the commitment to a Cambridge development corporation?

Asked by
Daniel Zeichner (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
790 c662
House
House of Commons

The Government remain fully committed to delivering nationally significant growth in Greater Cambridge. As my hon. Friend is well aware, we have established a centrally led urban development corporation to take it forward in partnership with local leaders.

Answered by
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
790 c662
House
House of Commons

Lords motion to approve. Amendment to regret debated and withdrawn. Original motion agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage
Answering member
Lord Jamieson
Department
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1173-1187
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Local Government, Planning and Land Act 1980 sets out that the Secretary of State may designate an urban development area where they are of the opinion that it is expedient and in the national interest, and following a public consultation. Between 4 February and 1 April 2026,...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1174-6
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Lansley

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 c1176
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for introducing the order and setting out so clearly what the Government are seeking to achieve. I have tabled a regret amendment, not because I oppose the establishment of the Greater Cambridge Development Corporation but because I think what is in the...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1176-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for setting out the case for the Greater Cambridge Development Corporation. Unavoidably, it sounded like something out of the 1970s, rather than something fit for the 21st century.

It is a pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord Lansley, although my perspective is very different...

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1177-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I note the criticisms of the new development corporation for Cambridgeshire, as spelled out by the noble Lord, Lord Lansley, from his expert local knowledge, but my comments are from the broader policy perspective. The use of the development corporation model represents a huge opportunity up and down...

Member
Lord Best (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1179-1180
House
House of Lords

My Lords, with permission, I will express a few thoughts, and I speak as chancellor of the University of Cambridge. I welcome the establishment of the Greater Cambridge Development Corporation. It will, quite simply, speed things up and cut through bureaucratic delays.

We need to acknowledge the growth potential of our...

Member
Lord Smith of Finsbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1180-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, development corporations have been widely welcomed—with one exception—because they have an important function in enabling development decisions that cover a wide area. So, the question for us is not the about principle of development corporations, but whether the Greater Cambridge devco is the most effective vehicle for achieving...

Member
Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1181-2
House
House of Lords