Skip to main content

1-20 of 51 results for subject:Cobalt

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Laid by
Kate Dearden
Department
Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
SI 2026/986
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will commission an independent inquiry into how hip replacements containing cobalt have affected the lives of patients.

Asked by
Lord Sikka (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 July 2025
Reference
HL8794
House
House of Lords
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee of Public Accounts
Date
10 February 2025
Reference
HC 512 2024-26
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what recent estimate he has made of the number of NHS patients harmed by cobalt poisoning from modular neck hip replacements in each of the last three years.

Asked by
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 October 2024
Reference
9691
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the reply by Lord Benyon on 30 November (HL Deb cols 1172–1174), what assessment they have made of the (1) health impacts, (2) developmental damage, and (3) risk of sexual assault, that may arise for children in the Democratic Republic of the Congo as...

Asked by
Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 December 2023
Reference
HL797
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the reply by Lord Benyon on 30 November (HL Deb cols 1172–1174), what steps they are taking to identify whether the cobalt-containing products imported into the UK are associated with child labour in the Democratic Republic of the Congo; what assessment they have made...

Asked by
Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 December 2023
Reference
HL798
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the use of child labour in the Democratic Republic of the Congo remains concerning. We regularly raise the issue of child labour in DRC’s artisanal cobalt mining sector both with the DRC Government and through multilateral fora such as the Human Rights Council.

Answered by
Lord Benyon (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 November 2023
Reference
834 c1172
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for that reply. Will he initiate an urgent investigation into reports of children standing knee-deep with their bare skin in toxic pools mining for cobalt, study the research of Professor Siddharth Kara published in Cobalt Red and challenge the absurdity of companies relying on assurances from state-run Chinese companies in the Congo that human rights norms are met? Under the terms of the Modern Slavery Act, will he consider, for offences committed within supply chains, making offending companies subject to company disqualification, as with GDPR violations, and meet me and other noble Lords who are concerned about these issues to discuss kite-marking and how products can be labelled in a way that demonstrates they come from places

where slave labour and child labour is being used, so consumers can make up their own mind about whether they want to be complicit in buying such products?

Asked by
Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 November 2023
Reference
834 c1172
House
House of Lords

I would be happy to meet the noble Lord, and perhaps he could bring with him people who could help us to move forward. We are a world leader in this. We passed the Modern Slavery Act. We now have requirements on companies with a turnover greater than £36 million to define their supply chains very accurately to make sure that the awful images the noble Lord describes have no part in the supply of cobalt. The Democratic Republic of the Congo has 70% of the world’s cobalt. We want to make sure that it comes to the world market in a way that is complicit with the standards we require.

Answered by
Lord Benyon (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 November 2023
Reference
834 c1173
House
House of Lords

My Lords, can I just pick up on the last point made by the noble Lord, Lord Alton, and by the Minister? The fact is that the Modern Slavery Act provides for those companies to make a statement, but that is it. There is no other requirement—no mechanism for enforcement where there is a breach. This is a really serious matter, not only in the DRC but in other countries where we are importing goods made by slaves and children. Will the Government act? There has been criticism of this for many years, since the first debate on the Act, so will we act to make sure compliance is compulsory?

Asked by
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 November 2023
Reference
834 c1173
House
House of Lords

Following a public consultation, the Government committed to taking forward an ambitious package of measures to strengthen the Modern Slavery Act’s transparency legislation, including extending reporting requirements to public bodies with a budget of £36 million or more, mandating the specific reporting of topic statements and what they must cover, requiring organisations to publish a modern slavery statement on the online registry and introducing financial penalties for organisations that fail to publish annual statements. This requires primary legislation, but in time we want to see it on the statute book.

Answered by
Lord Benyon (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 November 2023
Reference
834 c1173
House
House of Lords

My Lords, is not one means of reducing our cobalt reliance on dangerous and thoroughly undesirable resources to work on the Washington agreement we have made on critical minerals, which has been agreed between the two Governments, whereby, if we dig out more cobalt in this country—apparently we have some—and use it in our motor cars or use American cobalt, we will get a 15% subsidy on all cars sold into the American market? Can the Minister tell us how that is getting on?

Asked by
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 November 2023
Reference
834 c1173
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to my noble friend. He will understand that my relative newness in this role means that my learning curve is steep. I will do some research and discuss it with him when we next meet.

Answered by
Lord Benyon (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 November 2023
Reference
834 c1173
House
House of Lords

My Lords, when I was in Lubumbashi in September, I saw for myself the extent of the Chinese concessions for cobalt mining. With regard to east DRC, in June I raised in the Chamber a report from the US State Department that singled out Rwanda’s human rights record with its

support of the M23 group, which, as it said, has committed multiple violations of international humanitarian law and human rights abuses. There is concern that the FCDO has been silent while it is discussing a migration agreement with Rwanda. Can the Minister allay those concerns at the Dispatch Box today and condemn Rwanda’s human rights record in this regard?

Asked by
Lord Purvis of Tweed (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 November 2023
Reference
834 c1173
House
House of Lords

I can absolutely reassure the noble Lord. We regularly raise the conflict in eastern DRC with the Governments of DRC, Rwanda and elsewhere in the region. We judge doing this privately to have more impact. In these conversations, we urge all parties to deliver on their commitments agreed through the Nairobi and Luanda processes. This includes the withdrawal of armed groups, including M23, and the ceasing of all external support to armed groups operating in the DRC.

Answered by
Lord Benyon (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 November 2023
Reference
834 c1174
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare my interest as co-chairman of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on modern slavery and the vice-chairman of the Human Trafficking Foundation. Have the Government looked at the way in which the Americans deal with supply chains, by having hot goods that are not entitled to enter the country? If they have not looked at that, would they do so?

Asked by
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 November 2023
Reference
834 c1174
House
House of Lords

I will certainly take that back. I thank the noble and learned Baroness for her work in this area. It is vital that we are able to define accurately and have complete transparency through supply chains. As a previous questioner identified, cobalt is vital for technologies that we want to see that will help lower emissions, and it is used in a whole variety of daily products. We must make sure that it is not mined using child labour or slavery and that we are requiring companies to be transparent in their supply chains.

Answered by
Lord Benyon (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 November 2023
Reference
834 c1174
House
House of Lords

My Lords, may I press the Minister further on that point regarding the specific steps that the Government are now taking to identify whether cobalt-containing products imported into the UK are produced by child labour in the DRC?

Asked by
Lord Wigley (Plaid Cymru)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 November 2023
Reference
834 c1174
House
House of Lords

Through our modern slavery legislation and through the work we are doing in a variety of multilateral fora, we are trying to make sure that, with international companies mining not just cobalt but a whole range of other things—for diamonds, for example, using the Kimberley process, or for conflict minerals—we are doing work in-country, leading on partnerships that have seen great benefit, with children going into school as opposed to working in mines. UK taxpayers’ money is doing that, and we are working really hard on this. We want to make sure that companies are playing their part, too, and that their supply chains are transparent.

Answered by
Lord Benyon (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 November 2023
Reference
834 c1174
House
House of Lords

The Minister has asserted that we are a world leader in modern slavery work. That may have been the case, but can he explain, then, why there was such a hiatus between the departure of the previous modern slavery commissioner and the appointment of a new one? I believe that the new one

has not yet taken up her post. Secondly, if we are to lead on these issues, what are we doing to make sure that we are more resilient in terms of minerals such as cobalt?

Asked by
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 November 2023
Reference
834 c1174
House
House of Lords