Skip to main content

1-20 of 241 results for subject:Commodities

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, with reference to the Written Ministerial Statement of 23 June 2026 on The UK’s Approach to Deforestation Regulations, HCWS 137, which forest-risk commodities will be included within the scope of the proposed regulations.

Asked by
Andrew Snowden (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2026
Reference
12419
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps her Department is taking to ensure that (a) the UK Forest Risk Commodities Regulations operate on a shared responsibility basis and (b) compliance costs are borne by downstream companies.

Asked by
Fleur Anderson (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 June 2026
Reference
1326
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what safeguards will apply to protect smallholder farmers’ ownership and control of geolocation data collected for compliance with the Forest Risk Commodities regime.

Asked by
Seamus Logan (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 June 2026
Reference
5047
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what representations she has received from businesses on clarity on forest risk commodities regulation.

Asked by
Kerry McCarthy (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 March 2026
Reference
118160
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what legislative steps she is taking to introduce regulations under section 116 and Schedule 17 of the Environment Act 2021 on forest risk commodities in commercial activity.

Asked by
Kerry McCarthy (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 March 2026
Reference
118505
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty’s Government what steps they are taking to implement due diligence requirements for forest-risk commodities.

Asked by
Baroness Sheehan (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 cc966-970
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the UK strongly supports global efforts to protect forests and remains steadfast in working with partners to deliver the shared commitment to halt and reverse deforestation and forest degradation by 2030. The Government are currently considering their approach to addressing the deforestation impact of the use of forest-risk commodities in our supply chains, and we will update the House at the earliest opportunity.

Answered by
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c967
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the national security assessment, which the Government still refuse to publish in full, has been leaked in full to ITV News. It states that nature loss, including deforestation, is already slowing UK growth and productivity and could leave annual GDP 12% lower by 2030 than it would otherwise have been, making a mockery of the Government’s growth agenda. Will the Minister confirm these figures? When will the Government start taking nature loss as the grave economic threat that it is and get on with urgent job of protecting nature?

Asked by
Baroness Sheehan (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c967
House
House of Lords

I assure the noble Baroness that the UK remains absolutely committed to providing international climate finance, both now and in the future, and to play our part alongside other developed countries and climate finance providers to deliver on our international commitments. There is a real economic benefit globally, not just here, to do that. We are on track to deliver £11.6 billion in international climate finance by the end of 2025-26 and are supporting the transition to more sustainable food and land use globally to help ensure the future of our global supply chains.

Answered by
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c967
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I imagine that the Minister is aware that the Government have signed a memorandum of understanding with the Government of Indonesia, which is a substantial producer of palm oil and palm oil products. What steps are the Government taking to ensure that Indonesian palm oil products exported to us are not being grown in plantations planted in place of tropical rainforests?

Asked by
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c967
House
House of Lords

As I mentioned, we remain steadfast in working with partners to deliver our shared commitment to halt and reverse deforestation and forest degradation. Clearly, examples such as that which the noble Lord has just given are part of that. We need to ensure that any regulatory frameworks we bring in are robust and proportionate but also effective in addressing any deforestation in UK supply chains. Any decision-making will also have to consider the implications of the EU deforestation regulation on

UK businesses that trade with the EU, and that is part of the bigger picture in order to address exactly the issues that the noble Lord is talking about.

Answered by
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c967
House
House of Lords

My Lords, some might say that the Government’s proposals for nature loss are very ambitious; some might say they are overambitious. Does the noble Baroness agree that taking 10% of farmland out of food production to go towards clean energy projects is not in the interests of the country? Surely, taking farmland out of production in this way must count against nature loss and biodiversity gain.

Asked by
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c968
House
House of Lords

I am sure the noble Baroness is aware that the Government are working alongside farmers and environmental organisations on our farming road map, “Farming 2050, Growing England’s Future”, in order to set the course of farming over 25 years. We need a long-term vision for farming and food security, and this road map will be designed to get there, because ultimately, we need to deliver our food security alongside our environmental objectives.

Answered by
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c968
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is surely part of a much wider problem concerning the line of sight that businesses in this country have over their supply chains and supply lines. That applies to forests and to modern slavery, but it also applies generally in all sorts of ways—I declare my interest as chair of the National Preparedness Commission—to the sources and sustainability of the products on which we rely. This is not just about food security; it is also about ensuring that businesses know what their supply lines are and where they are from. What are we doing as a nation to make it easier for businesses to understand their supply chains?

Asked by
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c968
House
House of Lords

My noble friend asks a really important question. We announced a review of the UK’s approach to responsible business conduct as part of the UK trade strategy, and that is exploring the UK’s effectiveness in preventing human rights harms, labour rights harms and environmental harms in supply chains. That is how we are looking to support businesses and give them access to the kind of information my noble friend talks about.

Answered by
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c968
House
House of Lords

My Lords, while it is right to take steps to protect forests overseas, I point out that Brazil and Indonesia, for example, have 50% forest cover, versus only 13% here. These countries already protect their forests through the Brazilian forest code and the Indonesian timber legality assurance scheme. Can we not do more to make the world greener in our own country by increasing our paltry 16.5% forest cover target? I declare my interest as an investor in SLC Agricola and Anglo Eastern Plantations, and as a forest developer.

Asked by
Lord Roborough (Conservative; Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c968
House
House of Lords

We have ambitious tree-planting proposals, including planting three new national forests—one has already begun and two are well on the way—because it is important that we increase tree coverage. We are also looking at how we can better protect the forests we already have, particularly

our ancient woodlands. The environmental improvement plan the Government have recently published addresses many of those issues.

Answered by
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c968
House
House of Lords

My Lords, what projections have the Government made of the impact on regional GDP and jobs if UK food and retail businesses lose market share because overseas competitors can show that they are stronger on deforestation-free credentials? Will the Minister commit to publishing any economic modelling behind their current chosen timetable and the scope for these due diligence regulations?

Asked by
Baroness Grender (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c969
House
House of Lords

Due diligence, particularly around trade and standards, is incredibly important. We want, as I am sure the noble Baroness is aware, to grow our economy in this country, but at the same time we must support business and ensure that we are doing so in a way that is sustainable—whether it is to do with the environment or human rights and so on. We discussed the issues she talks about with the Department of Trade, and we will continue to have very close discussions with it on how we continue to grow sustainable businesses in this country.

Answered by
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c969
House
House of Lords

My Lords, regulations about forest-risk commodities were starting to be drawn up in 2023. In August 2024, the Labour Government said that they supported the policy and would work on it. It is really concerning to hear the Minister now say that they are still considering this policy. I know there was an issue connected with aspects of Northern Ireland, but can the Minister please say what is going on? Are they now going to change to the EU regulations which were decried around the world, or can we press on so that we can do something to help save the planet?

Asked by
Baroness Coffey (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c969
House
House of Lords