Skip to main content

1-20 of 21,359 results for subject:Conduct

Type

-
Early day motions (132)
+ Legislation (151) + Acts (10)
-
Public acts (10)
+ Bills (33) + Public bills (33)
-
Government bills (14)
+ Private members' bills (19)
-
Presentation bills (9)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (5)
-
Ten minute rule bills (5)
-
Church of England measures (1)
+ Delegated legislation (107)
-
Statutory instruments (107)
+ Members' contributions (18,420)
-
Business questions (342)
-
Maiden speeches (23)
-
Oral answers to questions (467)
-
Oral question time interventions (8)
+ Oral questions (500)
-
Prime Minister's questions (113)
-
Topical questions (39)
-
Points of order (62)
-
Proceeding contributions (17,436)
-
Speaker's rulings (73)
+ Parliamentary committees (584) + Committee proceedings (161)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (10)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (17)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (16)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (49)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (63)
-
Select Committee reports (283)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (20)
-
Select Committee written evidence (146)
+ Parliamentary papers (760)
-
Annual reports (12)
-
Command papers (23)
-
Consultation papers (9)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (4)
-
Deposited papers (186)
+ House of Commons papers (397)
-
House of Commons business publications (8)
+ House of Lords papers (143)
-
House of Lords business publications (15)
-
Impact assessments (10)
-
Unprinted command papers (3)
-
Unprinted papers (7)
-
White papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (887) + Debates (435)
-
Adjournment debates (27)
-
Backbench debates (5)
+ Committee proceedings (161)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (10)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (17)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (16)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (49)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (63)
-
Debates on select committee reports (69)
-
e-petition debates (2)
-
Emergency debate applications (1)
-
Emergency debates (1)
-
Estimates days (1)
+ Legislative debates (181)
-
Debates on bills (148)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (33)
-
Opposition days (10)
-
Questions for short debate (18)
+ Formal proceedings (30)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (30)
+ Petitions and observations (5)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (4)
-
Private notice questions (4)
+ Statements (377) + Oral statements (158)
-
Business statements (7)
-
Ministerial statements (80)
-
Personal statements (36)
-
Select Committee statements (1)
-
Speaker's statements (32)
-
Written statements (219)
-
Urgent questions (19)
+ Written corrections (3)
-
Ministerial corrections (3)
+ Parliamentary questions (1,844)
-
Business questions (342)
+ Oral questions (500)
-
Prime Minister's questions (113)
-
Topical questions (39)
-
Private notice questions (4)
-
Urgent questions (19)
-
Written questions (979)
+ Petitions and observations (5)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (4)
+ Research briefings (53) + Commons Briefing papers (39)
-
Briefing papers on bills (4)
-
Parliament facts and figures (3)
-
Commons Debate packs (5)
+ Lords Briefing packs (1)
-
Lords Briefing packs - Debates (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (7)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (3)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (3)
-
Lords Library Briefings - House of Lords (1)
-
POSTbriefs (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether she will introduce statutory time limits for fitness-to-practise and cause-for-concern investigations by Social Work England.

Asked by
Zöe Franklin (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 October 2026
Reference
35015
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps her Department is taking in response to the recommendations of the Dame Annie Hudson review of social work professional regulation to reduce delays in the handling of fitness-to-practise and cause-for-concern cases by Social Work England; and what target timeframe has...

Asked by
Zöe Franklin (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 October 2026
Reference
35016
House
House of Commons

The Independent Expert Panel determines cases against MPs and appeals under the Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme; and appeals under the MPs’ Code of Conduct.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
CBP-8944

Lords committee stage second day. Clauses 8 to 11 agreed to. Schedule 2 agreed to. (Part 1 of 2).

Lead member
Lord Lemos; Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent
Answering member
Baroness Finn; Lord Wolfson of Tredegar
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HL)
Notes
Welsh legislative consent granted, Northern Ireland and Scottish legislative consent sought.
Date
19 October 2026
Reference
860 cc470-531
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Brinton

31: After Clause 7, insert the following Clause—

“Offence of wilfully destroying information or records relevant to an inquiry or investigation

(1) A public authority or public official commits an offence if—

(a) they deliberately destroy relevant information or records which are or may be relevant to an inquiry, investigation, or...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2026
Reference
860 cc470-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, on the first day of Committee we discussed amendments to ensure that records, physical and digital, are explicitly added to the application of the duty of candour, because we know there have been a number of egregious cases where information was hidden. For example, I spoke of the...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2026
Reference
860 cc471-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support Amendment 31, in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton, and Amendment 82, in the name of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Keen of Elie. The noble Baroness has made a very compelling case. I would like to delve deeper into two of the...

Member
Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2026
Reference
860 cc472-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, statutory inquiries are very expensive. I was chairman of a statutory inquiry at about the same time as Lord Taylor. It really depresses me that, if you chair a statutory inquiry and you are given a whole lot of false information or not given the relevant information, the...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2026
Reference
860 c475
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend’s amendment, which I have signed, should not have needed examples to back it up, because I think it would stand without them, but those we have heard are very telling. The noble Baroness, Lady Finn, has not yet had an opportunity to introduce her noble...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2026
Reference
860 c475
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am not sure, in supporting these amendments, that I accept that they go far enough. There is one word missing from Amendment 31—“conceal” or “concealment”—and the same is missing from Clause 12 of the Bill. I respectfully suggest to the Minister that Clause 12(3) needs to be...

Member
Lord Carlile of Berriew (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2026
Reference
860 cc475-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome this amendment that would make it a criminal offence to deliberately destroy documents that could be relevant to an inquiry, but there is another side of this that we need to look at: the policy within organisations on which documents are kept. We would have thought...

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2026
Reference
860 cc477-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton, for opening our debate on this group. As she will see from my noble and learned friend Lord Keen of Elie’s amendment in this group, there is, happily, some common ground between us. Although both amendments in this group relate to...

Member
Baroness Finn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2026
Reference
860 cc478-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords who have spoken in the debate. I note that, as the noble Baroness, Lady Finn, said, there has been a deal of consensus. The noble Baroness, Lady Brinton, and others set out a depressing and dispiriting litany. I do not underestimate...

Member
Lord Lemos (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2026
Reference
860 cc479-480
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to all noble Lords who have spoken in this medium-sized debate—not terribly short by our standards on the first day. I think it has really helped the debate on what happens when people destroy documents. I am grateful in particular to the noble Lord,...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2026
Reference
860 cc480-1
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Carter of Haslemere

32: After Clause 7, insert the following new Clause—

“Recommendations

(1) This section applies when the Secretary of State receives the recommendations of an inquiry with respect to the actions of a public authority.

(2) Within 56 days, the Secretary of State must, in line with their duty of...

Member
Lord Carter of Haslemere (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2026
Reference
860 c481
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 32, which kicks off this second group, would require any Government to lay before Parliament the details of action which will be taken in response to a public inquiry’s recommendation or to explain why no action is to be taken. I am very grateful to the noble...

Member
Lord Carter of Haslemere (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2026
Reference
860 cc481-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have a few remarks on Amendment 32, which my noble friend Lord Carter has so ably introduced.

I have conducted some independent inquiries of a sort that would fall within this clause, though none of them cost millions or hundreds of millions. In some cases, my noble friend...

Member
Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2026
Reference
860 cc482-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome the amendment from the noble Lord, Lord Carter, on a very important issue: what happens to the outcomes of very lengthy and expensive inquiries? The noble Lord raised what has been spent on public inquiries since 1990 and I suspect that will grow even further.

The problem...

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2026
Reference
860 cc483-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too have sympathy with this recommendation and I hope that the Minister when replying will commit to having some further discussions, because I also have some sympathy with the comments that have been made—not all of them, but many of them. When I chaired the Soham inquiry,...

Member
Lord Bichard (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2026
Reference
860 c485
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was on the committee of your Lordships’ House referred to by the noble Lord, Lord Carter, looking into the future of public inquiries. I have to say that public inquiries

did not get an overwhelming endorsement. Many of us thought they went on too long, were too...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2026
Reference
860 cc485-6
House
House of Lords