Skip to main content

1-20 of 15,205 results for subject:Coroners

Type

-
Early day motions (22)
+ Legislation (137) + Acts (9)
-
Public acts (9)
+ Bills (19)
-
Hybrid bills (1)
+ Public bills (17)
-
Consolidation bills (2)
-
Government bills (6)
+ Private members' bills (9)
-
Ballot bills (1)
-
Presentation bills (1)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (6)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (109) + Statutory instruments (109)
-
Remedial orders (1)
+ Members' contributions (12,677)
-
Business questions (32)
-
Maiden speeches (14)
-
Oral answers to questions (248)
-
Oral question time interventions (1)
+ Oral questions (272)
-
Prime Minister's questions (20)
-
Topical questions (50)
-
Points of order (4)
-
Proceeding contributions (12,155)
+ Parliamentary committees (164) + Committee proceedings (93)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (4)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (23)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (4)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (43)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (16)
-
Select Committee reports (25)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (16)
-
Select Committee written evidence (33)
+ Parliamentary papers (322)
-
Annual reports (22)
-
Command papers (23)
-
Consultation papers (13)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (4)
-
Deposited papers (199)
-
House of Commons papers (59)
-
House of Lords papers (15)
-
Impact assessments (11)
-
Proposed negative statutory instruments (1)
-
Unprinted command papers (1)
-
Unprinted papers (22)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (580) + Debates (253)
-
Adjournment debates (37)
-
Backbench debates (7)
+ Committee proceedings (93)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (4)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (23)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (4)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (43)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (16)
-
e-petition debates (3)
+ Legislative debates (161)
-
Debates on bills (146)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (15)
+ Monarch's speech debates (4)
-
King's speech debates (1)
-
Queen's speech debates (3)
-
Opposition days (1)
-
Questions for short debate (5)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
-
Private notice questions (1)
+ Statements (313) + Oral statements (48)
-
Lord Speaker's statements (3)
-
Ministerial statements (43)
-
Select Committee statements (1)
-
Speaker's statements (2)
-
Written statements (265)
-
Urgent questions (5)
+ Written corrections (5)
-
Ministerial corrections (5)
+ Parliamentary questions (1,730)
-
Business questions (32)
+ Oral questions (272)
-
Prime Minister's questions (20)
-
Topical questions (50)
-
Private notice questions (1)
-
Urgent questions (5)
-
Written questions (1,420)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Research briefings (36) + Commons Briefing papers (26)
-
Briefing papers on bills (8)
-
Commons Debate packs (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (9)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (9)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they consider the factual summary of consultation responses published on 7 December 2023 to constitute the report required by section 4 of the Civil Partnerships, Marriages and Deaths (Registration etc.) Act 2019; on what basis they consider the statutory duty to have been fulfilled;...

Asked by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
HL3817
House
House of Lords

Lords committee stage third day. Clauses 13 to 16 agreed to. Schedule 4 agreed to. Clauses 17 to 19 agreed to. Schedule 5 agreed to. Clause 20, as amended, agreed to. Schedule 6, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 21 to 23 agreed to. Clauses 24 and 25, as amended, agreed...

Lead member
Lord Lemos; Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent
Answering member
Lord Keen of Elie
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HL)
Notes
Welsh legislative consent granted, Northern Ireland and Scottish legislative consent sought.
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 cc685-748
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Anderson of Ipswich

81: Clause 13, page 14, line 28, after “office” insert “with the intent”

Member's explanatory statement

This amendment removes an ambiguity in Clause 13 and clarifies, as recommended by the Law Commission, that the offence can be committed even where no benefit is obtained or detriment is suffered,...

Member
Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 c686
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we move on to Part 3 of the Bill, and I rise to speak to the first four amendments in this group, which concern misconduct in public office. I am grateful to the Minister, once again, for discussing them with me, as he promised to do.

This Government are...

Member
Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 cc686-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have put my name to the four amendments in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Anderson of Ipswich. I support the points he made. Words really matter, and particularly when one is seeking to put a common-law offence into statute, as we are doing here, great...

Member
Lord Hope of Craighead (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 c688
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I entirely agree with what the noble Lord, Lord Anderson, and the noble and learned Lord, Lord Hope, have said and endorse the reasons they have given.

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 c688
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have a number of amendments in the group, and I begin with my Amendment 93. It is a modest amendment, but it addresses what I believe to be an important gap in the Bill. Its purpose is straightforward: to ensure that the new offences of seriously improper...

Member
Baroness Levitt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 cc688-690
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have tabled Amendments 91 and 144, also signed by my noble friend Lady Hamwee, in this group. I also signed Amendments 87, 90, 92 and 94, tabled by my noble friend Lord Marks, whom I will leave to speak to them; obviously, I support them.

Amendments 91 and...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 c690
House
House of Lords

My Lords, all the amendments to Clause 13 in this group tidy up, rationalise and clarify the important new misconduct in public office offence. As the noble Lord, Lord Anderson, explained, Amendments 81, 83 and 84 make it clear that it is the intent that matters and that it is...

Member
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 cc691-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Anderson, for opening this debate.

A number of detailed but significant amendments have been proposed to Clause 13. In general, the Official Opposition may not have proposed this Bill in the first place, and it is of course for the Minister to respond...

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 cc693-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords for their contributions to this debate. It is good that we are discussing this in prime time, rather than at 11.30 pm, or whatever it was, on Monday. It has made the debate more spirited.

I will make some preliminary remarks before I respond...

Member
Lord Lemos (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 cc694-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords who have spoken in this debate in support of these amendments—all of whom are highly experienced in the realities of conducting a trial. I understand that massed ranks of lawyers are not to everyone’s taste but, in this case, given the...

Member
Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 cc697-8
House
House of Lords

No!

Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 c698
House
House of Lords

The ironic cheers will be noted by Hansard.

On Amendment 85, regarding the scope of the defence, I am grateful again to the Minister for his explanation. Nevertheless, I remain uncertain as to exactly why the Government felt it necessary to depart from the considered and closely reasoned recommendations of the...

Member
Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 c698
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Kramer

95: Schedule 5, page 62, line 23, at end insert—

“Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012

5 In section 10 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (civil legal services: exceptional cases), after subsection (5) insert—

“(5A) A wider public interest determination is a...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 cc698-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this group of amendments contains a whole variety of different aspects of legal aid. There is such expertise in this Committee that I will confine my remarks to my own amendment, as others will speak far more effectively to the other amendments.

Amendment 95 would provide a route to...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 cc699-700
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Amendments 117 and 120, in my name. Before I do so, I associate myself with the remarks of the noble Baroness, Lady Kramer, and strongly support what she has just said. I am quite sure that we will be returning to these issues of...

Member
Lord Wills (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 cc700-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as we heard from the noble Baroness, Lady Kramer, I have Amendment 124 in this group. Arguably, it might have been better placed in the next group; if so, I apologise to the Committee for not being more on the ball. I am very grateful for the support...

Member
Baroness Chakrabarti (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 cc701-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I speak on this group because there is a growing outcry for funded legal support for Windrush victims and survivors, to create a level playing field with other state scandals. For several years now, I have stood in this Chamber and called on this Government—and the previous Government—for...

Member
Baroness Benjamin (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 cc703-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, clearly, there is concern across the Committee about the issue of legal aid, and equally, the treatment of whistleblowers in the context of representation. We are not convinced at this stage that it is necessary to establish a separate route to legal aid in these cases.

Turning to Amendments...

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 c704
House
House of Lords