Skip to main content

1-20 of 48 results for subject:Courtsdesk

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to the oral contribution of the Minister for Courts and Legal Services of 10 February 2026, Official Report, Column 707, for what reason the data protection breach was sufficient to terminate the contract but did not meet the threshold for...

Asked by
Mike Wood (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 February 2026
Reference
112638
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps she is taking to maintain the CourtsDesk database of court records.

Asked by
Kieran Mullan (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 February 2026
Reference
112872
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Justice Committee
Date
24 February 2026
House
House of Commons

My Lords, we are all committed to open justice, but so we are to the protection of sensitive personal data. Minister Sackman told the Commons yesterday, as has the Minister here, that Courtsdesk had been sharing with an AI company, no doubt for commercial purposes, personal data of defendants and...

Member
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c236
House
House of Lords

My Lords, first, I reassure your Lordships’ House that all journalists can access the information in exactly the same way as they could through Courtsdesk—it is just a slightly more complicated method: they have to go through HMCTS. The point about Courtsdesk was that it provided a slightly more convenient...

Member
Baroness Levitt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc234-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I know my noble friend the Minister will agree that it was utterly unacceptable for the company concerned to release personal information about vulnerable victims and witnesses without their permission or the permission of the department. As she knows, I am not a lawyer, but does she consider...

Member
Baroness Brown of Silvertown (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c237
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Baroness for her question. In fact, there was no contract; it was a licensing agreement. Our view is that there was a clear breach of the licensing agreement, and that is why we were concerned. The real issue is Courtsdesk’s lack of candour with us when...

Member
Baroness Levitt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c237
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is worth saying that there has been a substantive rebuttal by the CEO of Courtsdesk, to which I understand the Government have not responded. I have no vested interest in this issue, but it is a matter of fact that Courtsdesk has gone to extensive lengths to...

Member
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c237
House
House of Lords

Absolutely not. The first thing I would say in reply to the rebuttal put up very recently by the chief executive of Courtsdesk—it went up during my meeting with officials earlier this morning to discuss this issue—is, they would say that, wouldn’t they? Secondly, if there was nothing wrong with...

Member
Baroness Levitt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c237
House
House of Lords

My Lords, while I commend the MoJ for doing what departments do not always do—policing these contracts properly—is there an argument, given the importance of this information and of making it accessible to journalists, but also of protecting sensitive data, for the department developing an in-house function capable of sorting...

Member
Baroness Chakrabarti (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c237
House
House of Lords

It is a very good question. In fact, that already exists in part. There is something known as CaTH, which deals with listing information in relation to civil courts and tribunals, and a criminal court listing service is going to be added to it in March. The thing about the...

Member
Baroness Levitt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c237
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I read the exchanges yesterday in the other place and I welcome what the Minister has said about this. Out of interest, what reason—or should I say, what excuse—did Courtsdesk give when it was revealed that it was passing personal, private and legally sensitive information to a third-party...

Member
Viscount Stansgate (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c236
House
House of Lords

The answer to the first of my noble friend’s questions is that Courtsdesk says that it did not think there was anything wrong with what it was doing. We venture to disagree. The answer to the second question is, absolutely, and that is why we are going to issue licences...

Member
Baroness Levitt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c236
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Courtsdesk court reporting data has been a great success in providing access to data from our courts. It has been reported that about 1,500 journalists have used the platform. It has proved particularly important in collating information about grooming gangs and in properly investigating that terrible issue....

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c233
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am in the happy position of being able to reassure your Lordships’ House that there is no cover-up or conspiracy. The facts are as follows. Courtsdesk, a commercial company,

was given copies of the data held in magistrates’ courts’ registers for one purpose only: to share it...

Member
Baroness Levitt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc233-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c236
House
House of Lords

Lords statement on the implications for open justice of the impending deletion of the Courtsdesk court reporting data archive.

Lead member
Baroness Levitt
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc233-6
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Justice Committee
Date
11 February 2026
House
House of Commons

(Urgent Question): To ask the Secretary of State for Justice if he will make a statement on the implications for open justice of the impending deletion of the Courtsdesk court reporting data archive.

Member
Kieran Mullan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
780 c703
House
House of Commons

I am committed, as are this Government, to greater transparency in our justice system. I am also committed to putting the dignity of victims first. As Courts Minister, I have a concern that people should know what goes on in our courts. It is a way of enhancing transparency and...

Member
Sarah Sackman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
780 c703
House
House of Commons