Skip to main content

1-20 of 9,772 results for subject:Decommissioning

Type

-
Early day motions (20)
+ Legislation (52) + Acts (8)
-
Public acts (8)
+ Bills (13) + Public bills (13)
-
Government bills (10)
+ Private members' bills (3)
-
Presentation bills (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (2)
+ Delegated legislation (31)
-
Statutory instruments (31)
+ Members' contributions (6,599)
-
Business questions (37)
-
Maiden speeches (6)
-
Oral answers to questions (474)
+ Oral questions (496)
-
Prime Minister's questions (45)
-
Topical questions (15)
-
Points of order (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (5,628)
+ Parliamentary committees (194) + Committee proceedings (100)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (10)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (6)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (13)
-
European Committee proceedings (1)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (3)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (34)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (23)
-
Select Committee reports (31)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (17)
-
Select Committee written evidence (52)
+ Parliamentary papers (342)
-
Annual reports (11)
-
Command papers (22)
-
Consultation papers (9)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (3)
-
Deposited papers (119)
-
House of Commons papers (127)
-
House of Lords papers (6)
-
Impact assessments (18)
-
Treaties (6)
-
Unprinted command papers (6)
-
Unprinted papers (47)
-
White papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (479) + Debates (224)
-
Adjournment debates (21)
-
Budget debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (100)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (10)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (6)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (13)
-
European Committee proceedings (1)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (3)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (34)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (23)
-
Debates on select committee reports (5)
+ Legislative debates (154)
-
Debates on bills (117)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (35)
-
Opposition days (6)
-
Questions for short debate (4)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (1)
-
Private notice questions (5)
+ Statements (224) + Oral statements (40)
-
Business statements (1)
-
Ministerial statements (39)
-
Written statements (184)
-
Urgent questions (4)
+ Written corrections (3)
-
Ministerial corrections (3)
+ Parliamentary questions (2,786)
-
Business questions (37)
+ Oral questions (496)
-
Prime Minister's questions (45)
-
Topical questions (15)
-
Private notice questions (5)
-
Urgent questions (4)
-
Written questions (2,244)
+ Research briefings (38) + Commons Briefing papers (27)
-
Briefing papers on bills (4)
-
Commons Debate packs (7)
+ Lords Library Briefings (2)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (1)
-
POSTnotes (2)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many warships have been a) taken out of operational service b) sold or c) scrapped in every year since 2010.

Asked by
Andrew Rosindell (Reform UK)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 October 2026
Reference
34886
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 19 October 2026 to question 30567 on Armoured Fighting Vehicles: Decommissioning, what his planned timetable is for completing the review into Bulldog’s out of service date.

Asked by
Ben Obese-Jecty (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
37024
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the answer of 20 October 2025, to question 79409 on Navy: Patrol Craft, what steps he has taken to identify a replacement for the Batch 1 Offshore Patrol Vessels due to be retired in 2028.

Asked by
Ben Obese-Jecty (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
37123
House
House of Commons

Statement on the Jackdaw gasfield.

Lead member
Michael Shanks
Department
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
791 cc1117-1147
House
House of Commons

First, Mr Speaker, I entirely respect your comments. I hope that in my time in this House I have always given you the impression that I take this House seriously. Your points have been noted, and I will absolutely take them back to the Department.

Member
Michael Shanks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
791 c1117
House
House of Commons

With your permission, Mr Speaker, I will now make a statement on the offshore Jackdaw gasfield and the Government’s approach more broadly to North sea oil and gas. This supplements the written ministerial statement that I made to the House on the topic earlier this morning.

The original grant of consent...

Member
Michael Shanks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
791 cc1118-9
House
House of Commons

Finally, Mr Speaker—at last, after two and a half years, this Government have found it within themselves to do the right thing, after exhausting all the alternatives. We have arrived at this destination far later than we should have.

Jackdaw was first approved by us in 2022. When in government, we...

Member
Andrew Bowie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
791 cc1119-1120
House
House of Commons

In the two and a half years that the hon. Gentleman says that he has had to think about this, he might have come up with something better than that performance. The Conservatives’ lack of contrition for a decision that was quashed by a court is absolutely shameful. I reiterate...

Member
Michael Shanks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
791 cc1120-1
House
House of Commons

I warmly welcome the Minister’s statement and the commitment to going ahead with Jackdaw. The Select Committee has heard evidence time and again about the damage done by the chaotic deindustrialisation of the ’80s, and the failure in the 2010s and early 2020s to take action in the North sea....

Member
Bill Esterson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
791 c1121
House
House of Commons

I agree with my hon. Friend about the transition. The vast majority of jobs in the oil and gas industry are in the very supply chains that we need to build the renewables and networks of the future, so it is important that we hold on to those; that is...

Member
Michael Shanks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
791 c1121
House
House of Commons

Today’s approval of Jackdaw, in the midst of a climate crisis, is proof that Britain has not moved forward nearly fast enough on reducing our reliance on gas and oil. The Supreme Court judgment requires analysis of scope 3 carbon emissions of gas and oil licences, so the Government must...

Member
Pippa Heylings (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
791 c1122
House
House of Commons

I am genuinely confused about the Lib Dems’ position, because my understanding was that they were now in favour of the Jackdaw field. Maybe that will change again by the end of the day. I hear the point that she makes. We are not waiting for a tipping point. We...

Member
Michael Shanks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
791 c1122
House
House of Commons

Today’s decision is probably not a surprise to most people. It will make a relatively limited difference to energy security, and probably very little difference to pricing, but I very much welcome what the Minister said about it being part of a transition, and about us not ripping up the...

Member
Toby Perkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
791 c1123
House
House of Commons

I agree with my hon. Friend about the absolute priority. He is absolutely right to say that this decision will not take a penny off bills. We have been consistent on that throughout. We are a price taker as a country, and no number of consenting decisions will change the...

Member
Michael Shanks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
791 c1123
House
House of Commons

Like Mr Speaker, I was angry and frustrated to find that the Secretary of State was not making the statement. I first learned that the Secretary of State was in my constituency when I saw her on TV this morning; that is being completely disrespectful to another Member.

The decision on...

Member
Douglas Lumsden (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
791 c1123
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. As a fellow by-election MP, I can agree with the hon. Member that we need to dine out on our by-elections as much as we can; he was quite right to raise that.

The hon. Member is right about the process. I will not comment on...

Member
Michael Shanks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
791 c1124
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister, and recognise how much time he takes to talk to the Energy Security and Net Zero Committee; he is barely ever out of the chair in front of us. He is very dedicated. Today’s decision is one that the Tories could not get over the line,...

Member
Melanie Onn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
791 c1124
House
House of Commons

I love my appearances before the Select Committee; I gently point out that other Ministers in the Department would love to come and give evidence as well. Nevertheless, I am happy to do so, and I always appreciate the conversations.

My hon. Friend is right. We moved as quickly as we...

Member
Michael Shanks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
791 cc1124-5
House
House of Commons

The Minister said in reply to the shadow Secretary of State that the delay in the decision on Jackdaw was fiscally neutral because, in essence, the investment was made at risk.

Member
Steve Barclay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
791 c1125
House
House of Commons

indicated dissent.

Member
Michael Shanks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
791 c1125
House
House of Commons