Skip to main content

1-20 of 9,101 results for subject:Discipline

Type

-
Early day motions (4)
+ Legislation (149) + Acts (16)
-
Public acts (16)
+ Bills (18) + Public bills (18)
-
Consolidation bills (1)
-
Government bills (13)
+ Private members' bills (4)
-
Presentation bills (4)
-
Church of England measures (1)
+ Delegated legislation (114) + Statutory instruments (114)
-
Remedial orders (1)
+ Members' contributions (7,303)
-
Business questions (10)
-
Maiden speeches (11)
-
Oral answers to questions (212)
-
Oral question time interventions (1)
+ Oral questions (228)
-
Prime Minister's questions (11)
-
Topical questions (13)
-
Proceeding contributions (6,862)
+ Parliamentary committees (172) + Committee proceedings (142)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (31)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (24)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (48)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (29)
-
Select Committee reports (19)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (8)
-
Select Committee written evidence (3)
+ Parliamentary papers (230)
-
Annual reports (3)
-
Command papers (22)
-
Consultation papers (12)
-
Deposited papers (108)
-
House of Commons papers (81)
-
House of Lords papers (7)
-
Impact assessments (7)
-
Unprinted command papers (4)
-
Unprinted papers (5)
-
White papers (6)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (336) + Debates (271)
-
Adjournment debates (14)
-
Backbench debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (142)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (31)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (24)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (48)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (29)
-
Debates on select committee reports (1)
+ Legislative debates (204)
-
Debates on bills (155)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (49)
+ Monarch's speech debates (4)
-
Queen's speech debates (4)
-
Opposition days (4)
-
Questions for short debate (5)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (1)
+ Statements (56) + Oral statements (31)
-
Ministerial statements (30)
-
Written statements (25)
+ Written corrections (3)
-
Ministerial corrections (3)
+ Parliamentary questions (1,320)
-
Business questions (10)
+ Oral questions (228)
-
Prime Minister's questions (11)
-
Topical questions (13)
-
Written questions (1,082)
+ Research briefings (23) + Commons Briefing papers (20)
-
Briefing papers on bills (1)
-
Commons Debate packs (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (1)
-
POSTnotes (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the report Local Child Safeguarding Practice Review: Mossbourne Victoria Park Academy, published in December 2025, and what steps they intend to take to hold the school to account for the practices highlighted in the report.

Asked by
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
HL2470
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee
Date
14 July 2026
Reference
HL 38 2026-27
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many prison rules were broken by prisoners in HMP Belmarsh in the last two years.

Asked by
Nick Timothy (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 July 2026
Reference
14483
House
House of Commons

My Lords, we welcome the evidence in this report, in particular the inclusion of the voices of children and young people. The Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act is a key step towards delivering the Government’s mission to break the link between young people’s background and their future success, and will deliver new measures to support children’s behaviour, well-being and protection. This sits alongside earlier support for children and families through our £2.4 billion families first partnership programme and our Best Start Family Hubs.

Answered by
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 June 2026
Reference
857 c141
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we already know that regular physical punishment encourages children to bully other children and damages their relationship with their parents. The UCL research has now shown us that it also damages their educational attainment and future prospects. When will the Government take not just a small step but follow the example of Wales and Scotland and dozens of other countries and give children equal protection under the law of assault as the adults around them have? The Government plan to protect children from online harms. How about protecting them in their own homes?

Asked by
Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 June 2026
Reference
857 c141
House
House of Lords

The UCL research is interesting. I note that UCL itself says that the analysis does not necessarily prove causality, although it does demonstrate correlation. The action that this Government are taking is not a small step, including as it does the reform of the children’s social care system and considerable investment in the Best Start Family Hubs programme to support children and parents with some of the difficult decisions and issues that any of us who have parented know that we will face. That strikes me as being a quite important development, very well invested in, in this country.

Answered by
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 June 2026
Reference
857 c141
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I congratulate my noble friend the Minister on her lifelong professional commitment to children and young people. Might doubters in England be persuaded if we explored replacing the common-law defence of reasonable chastisement with a statutory defence of reasonable restraint of a child?

Asked by
Baroness Chakrabarti (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 June 2026
Reference
857 c141
House
House of Lords

The point I am trying to make is that, even if you look at the evidence in Scotland and Wales, I am not sure that changes to the specifics of the law around reasonable punishment are the most important and effective way to protect children and to support parents in not resorting to physical punishment of their children. The steps that this Government are taking are more profound and more effective than a change in the law would be.

Answered by
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 June 2026
Reference
857 c142
House
House of Lords

My Lords, do the Government recognise that this report shows quite clearly the link between a failure to protect children from abuse and poor outcomes for those children? If parents who are not coping with parenting are to access family hubs and all the other support services, the law has to give a clear message that children should not be assaulted. You cannot assault an adult repeatedly; therefore, you should not be damaging a child’s life chances by repeatedly assaulting the child.

Asked by
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 June 2026
Reference
857 c142
House
House of Lords

The law in this country gives the strong message that it is wrong to assault a child. The clear advice from government is that it is wrong to use physical punishment against a child. What is more, we are providing the support necessary to help parents to address that. We are investing in the capacity of social care to be able to identify where neglect and abuse has happened in families. We are investing in earlier intervention through the families first partnership programme. The question is whether the appropriate thing to do at this moment is to focus on changing the law. That is not our priority.

Answered by
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 June 2026
Reference
857 c142
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I turn to the point mentioned by my noble friend Lady Walmsley about the experiences of Scotland and Wales. Have the Government looked at the assessments that have been made by those Governments on safeguarding and the number of incidents reported to them of harm to young children?

Asked by
Lord Mohammed of Tinsley (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 June 2026
Reference
857 c142
House
House of Lords

We have looked, for example, at the Welsh report on the implementation of the abolition of the defence of reasonable punishment in Wales. As I said, the report is on the implementation of the law rather than the outcomes achieved by it. It highlights the importance of professional confidence, inter-agency collaboration and widely available parenting support. As I have already identified, those are all things in which we are investing considerable amounts of money in England and where we have taken action through legislation to transform the social care system so as to prioritise them.

Answered by
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 June 2026
Reference
857 c142
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it would be wrong to speak today of physical punishment without raising the evil murder of the baby Preston Davey. As the Minister knows, we on the Conservative Benches welcome her structural reforms to social care, but there is still a gap. As the Munro inquiry and repeated case reviews have found, the assumptions, biases and culture of individual agency workers are still a major problem.

These need to be addressed so that individuals will act to protect children without fear or favour. How does the Minister propose to address these issues?

Asked by
Baroness Cash (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 June 2026
Reference
857 c142
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness is right to draw attention to that terrible case, and to the requirement, whenever we are faced with tragedies such as that, to learn the right lessons about how we need to reform the system. On her particular point about workers, one of the ways that we improve the way in which social workers and others, whether agency or otherwise, work is to increase their capacity, to focus them, as we are doing, on neglect and abuse, and to improve their training. We will continue to do that while, of course, learning the lessons from tragedies such as the one that she has identified today.

Answered by
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 June 2026
Reference
857 c143
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is already the case that the serious assault of a child is illegal. What we are talking about is smacking children. Is there any evidence that, since that has been introduced into countries, parents are being prosecuted—that is what it means; prosecuting parents—and that that has helped the situation?

Asked by
Lord Watts (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 June 2026
Reference
857 c143
House
House of Lords

My noble friend is right that it is, as I have emphasised, already illegal to assault a child. He is also right to identify what we can most effectively do to prevent parents feeling that they need to resort to smacking in order to discipline or control their children. The £900 million that we are investing in the Best Start in Life centres, for example, is being used to develop parenting education on behaviour management. How do you set appropriate boundaries? What type of methods should you and could you use to discipline your children? That feels like a more constructive and wide-ranging response than a change in the law at this point.

Answered by
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 June 2026
Reference
857 c143
House
House of Lords

My Lords, did not the Preston Davey case prove that the current situation is simply not working? That poor boy was sexually assaulted and abused for months. The question has to be asked: why did no one from any agency pick this up?

Asked by
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 June 2026
Reference
857 c143
House
House of Lords

One of the important points about the legislation that we have just taken through this House is a stronger duty to report abuse and to share information. We must continue to support and train all professional staff who work with children to understand their responsibilities to both recognise and report abuse when they see it.

Answered by
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 June 2026
Reference
857 c143
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the Minister agree that there has been overwhelming acceptance in Wales of the policy that was introduced by the former Labour Government? In the recent election, there was hardly an issue on this matter arising. Will she take the opportunity to discuss with her two colleagues who are former First Ministers of Wales how this policy has been implemented?

Asked by
Lord Wigley (Plaid Cymru)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 June 2026
Reference
857 c143
House
House of Lords

As I have already said, we have looked carefully at the first report into the implementation of the changes in Wales. I think

I said that we looked at the conclusions, particularly around the need for professional confidence, inter-agency collaboration and a wider availability of parenting support. Those are exactly the provisions that we are putting in place, through investment and through the legislation that has just gone through this House.

Answered by
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 June 2026
Reference
857 c143
House
House of Lords