Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,443 results for subject:Dredging

Type

-
Early day motions (1)
+ Legislation (11) + Bills (1)
-
Private bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (10)
-
Statutory instruments (10)
+ Members' contributions (956)
-
Business questions (5)
-
Oral answers to questions (54)
-
Oral question time interventions (3)
+ Oral questions (55)
-
Prime Minister's questions (1)
-
Topical questions (4)
-
Points of order (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (844)
+ Parliamentary committees (20) + Committee proceedings (11)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (1)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (5)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (3)
-
Select Committee reports (5)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (5)
-
Select Committee written evidence (2)
+ Parliamentary papers (36)
-
Consultation papers (6)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (1)
-
Deposited papers (20)
-
House of Commons papers (11)
-
Impact assessments (3)
-
Proposed negative statutory instruments (1)
-
Unprinted command papers (1)
-
Unprinted papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (49) + Debates (32)
-
Adjournment debates (10)
-
Backbench debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (11)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (1)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (5)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (3)
-
Debates on select committee reports (1)
-
Estimates days (1)
+ Legislative debates (16)
-
Debates on bills (9)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (7)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (1)
+ Petitions and observations (4)
-
Observations on petitions (2)
-
Paper petitions (2)
+ Statements (11) + Oral statements (2)
-
Ministerial statements (2)
-
Written statements (9)
-
Urgent questions (1)
+ Parliamentary questions (453)
-
Business questions (5)
+ Oral questions (55)
-
Prime Minister's questions (1)
-
Topical questions (4)
-
Urgent questions (1)
-
Written questions (392)
+ Petitions and observations (4)
-
Observations on petitions (2)
-
Paper petitions (2)
+ Research briefings (1)
-
POSTnotes (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate she has made of the annual tonnage of Air Pollution Control Residues used as a stabiliser to dehydrate dredgings under Section 43 (5) of the Finance Act 1996.

Asked by
James Wild (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
16585
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what consideration she has given to amending Section 43 (5) of the Finance Act 1996 such that materials added for the purposes of dehydrating dredgings are subject to the lower rate of landfill tax.

Asked by
James Wild (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
16580
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Heidi Alexander
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Select Committee reports (Government responses); Unprinted papers
Date
6 July 2026
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

National Policy Statement for Ports: Response to the Transport Committee and to consultation. Incl. Appendices. 36p.

Deposited by
Department for Transport
Type
Consultation papers (Government responses); Deposited papers
Date
6 July 2026
Reference
DEP2026-0528
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, with reference to the proposed removal of landfill tax exemptions for stabilisers used in dredged material, what assessment she has made of the potential environmental consequences of (a) delays to dredging, (b) reduced maintenance of contaminated waterways and (c) any resulting increase in...

Asked by
James Wild (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
122277
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment she has made of the potential impact on UK ports and harbour authorities of removing the landfill tax exemption for dredged material and stabilisers used in the treatment of dredgings from April 2027.

Asked by
James Wild (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
122274
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what engagement her Department has had with (a) the British Ports Association, (b) individual port operators and (c) river and canal authorities regarding the proposal to remove landfill tax exemptions relevant to dredging and port maintenance.

Asked by
James Wild (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
122275
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the impact of the activities of the Crown Estate on (1) the Welsh economy, and (2) household budgets in Wales.

Asked by
Baroness Humphreys (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 cc4-7
House
House of Lords

The recently passed Crown Estate Act ensured that the Crown Estate can continue working in the best interests of Wales and the wider United Kingdom. The Crown Estate is key to the £1.4 billion of economic growth and more than 5,000 jobs that the Government want to secure from floating offshore wind in the Celtic Sea. It works closely with the Welsh Government to ensure that the offshore potential of this emerging sector benefits Welsh communities onshore.

Answered by
Lord Wilson of Sedgefield (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 c4
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for that reply. However, the Crown Estate has removed the cap for offshore wind leases and is running uncapped auctions that force wind farm developers to pay extremely high fees simply to access the seabed. Can the Minister confirm that the fourth offshore wind leasing round generated more profit for the Crown Estate than all the previous rounds combined and that this system has inflated the cost of building offshore wind farms, with a consequent increase in electricity prices for household budgets in Wales? Is it not time for political oversight of the activities of the Crown Estate in Wales?

Asked by
Baroness Humphreys (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 c4
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Baroness for that question, but on the point about oversight, a Crown Estate commissioner with special responsibility for Wales will be appointed in due course. As far as offshore wind is concerned, for Wales a priority is to deliver certainty. Retaining the current model avoids fragmenting a cross-border Celtic Sea market and preserves investor confidence at a sensitive

point for floating offshore wind. Further devolution would risk fragmenting the energy market, undermining international investor confidence and disrupting activity elsewhere in the Crown Estate.

Answered by
Lord Wilson of Sedgefield (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 c4
House
House of Lords

Is the Minister not aware of the reply given by a Minister in the other place to the MP for Anglesey, Llinos Medi, when the Government confirmed that they had no assessment of how many jobs would come to Wales from the new offshore wind projects in the Celtic Sea and the Irish Sea? Is the Minister aware of the very real concern in Wales that these projects will be bypassing Wales’s supply chains, losing economic potential? Is it not necessary for power and authority over the Crown Estate to be transferred to the Welsh Government so that they get the priority that they deserve?

Asked by
Lord Wigley (Plaid Cymru)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 c5
House
House of Lords

Offshore will create up to 5,000 jobs—on top of the 3,000 jobs that will be created by the building of small modular reactors on Anglesey. It will provide energy for 1.5 million households. We are aiming in the right direction. As far as the supply chain is concerned, we will be investing £50 million for a supply chain accelerator and up to £350 million for enabling port and supply chain infrastructure to come forward.

Answered by
Lord Wilson of Sedgefield (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 c5
House
House of Lords

Have His Majesty’s Government asked the Crown Estate exactly how it helps to deliver their promise for a more environmentally conscious and greener Wales when it carries on handing out licences to marine aggregate dredgers to dredge in marine protected areas off Wales? Dirty seas deter tourists.

Asked by
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 c5
House
House of Lords

We have a very good relationship with the Crown Estate and work very closely with the Welsh Government. We will be appointing a commissioner to the Crown Estate to ensure that we have someone there who is prepared to look consciously at all the issues that affect Wales. We want to see a Welsh economy that is growing. One way of doing that is through investing in green industries, which I would have thought the noble Baroness would welcome.

Answered by
Lord Wilson of Sedgefield (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 c5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, to pick up the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Wigley, is the Minister aware that people in Wales are convinced, following conversations with the Crown Estate, that the overwhelming majority of new skilled jobs created by offshore in the Celtic Sea will go to outsiders, not to people in Wales, and that the supply chain will use a few Welsh companies but primarily suppliers from outside Wales? Therefore, can he talk to us about what the Government are doing to build the supply chain and the skills in Wales and to make sure that Welsh companies have a definite percentage of the new business and opportunities that are on offer?

Asked by
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 c5
House
House of Lords

The Crown Estate and the Government are particularly concerned about ensuring that we have investment in local supply chains, and we are going along with that in whatever we are doing. For example, as I have said, this £50 million is

going to be invested in the supply chain accelerator. We are going to ensure that some of the money that will be generated from offshore wind goes into local communities. We are well aware of the issues, but we need to focus on the fact that we are heading in the right direction as far as green energy development is concerned.

Answered by
Lord Wilson of Sedgefield (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 c5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, when the Crown Estate had this windfall from its offshore wind bonanza, it was reputed to have said that it wanted a lot of the money to go towards good causes. Given that this will mean an explosion of overhead power lines in Wales and elsewhere in the United Kingdom, what discussions have the Government had with the Crown Estate about spending some of that bonanza on, where possible, burying these power lines?

Asked by
Lord Swire (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 c6
House
House of Lords

The Government’s approach to burying these cables underground is well known, really, because, essentially, where we can do it, we will, in order to protect the local area. It is cheaper to put them overhead, but even if you bury them, there is still a lot of disruption to the local area with the kind of access you need to the cables themselves. It is not actually the answer to all our concerns. We know that we need to think about how we develop these pylons and whether we should lay the cables under the ground, but to do that is not the answer in all cases.

Answered by
Lord Wilson of Sedgefield (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 c6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does my noble friend agree that the events in the Middle East and the renewed shock to oil and gas prices show why we should be self-sufficient, which is why we should enormously welcome the development of offshore wind off the coast of Wales?

Asked by
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
9 March 2026
Reference
854 c6
House
House of Lords