Skip to main content

1-20 of 37 results for subject:Equinor

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, whether his Department has had recent discussions with (a) the Crown Estate and (b) Equinor and Gwynt Glas on the use of Port Talbot for turbine (i) assembly and (ii) maintenance under the Celtic Sea Floating Offshore Wind...

Asked by
David Chadwick (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 October 2025
Reference
83511
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether (a) Equinor and (b) Ithaca have received (i) investment tax credit and (ii) ringfence expenditure supplement in connection to Rosebank oil field development in the period leading up to January 2025.

Asked by
Carla Denyer (Green Party)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 February 2025
Reference
29661
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether her Department has budgeted for any (a) investment tax credit and (b) ringfenced expenditure supplement to be paid to (i) Equinor and (ii) Ithaca in connection to Rosebank oil field development after February 2025.

Asked by
Carla Denyer (Green Party)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 February 2025
Reference
29660
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what discussions he has had with (a) Equinor, (b) Shell, and (c) Ithaca Energy on the regulatory process for reassessing the environmental impact of the (i) Rosebank and (ii) Jackdaw fields.

Asked by
Andrew Bowie (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 February 2025
Reference
27612
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Amanda Solloway) made the following Statement yesterday:

This Statement concerns an application for development consent made under the Planning Act 2008 by Equinor New Energy Limited for the extension of two off-shore wind farms with associated on-shore electricity connections, located 15.8km and...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Department
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written statements
Date
10 January 2024
Reference
HLWS172
House
House of Lords

This Statement concerns an application for development consent made under the Planning Act 2008 by Equinor New Energy Limited for the extension of two off-shore wind farms with associated on-shore electricity connections, located 15.8km and 26.5km north of the Norfolk Coast respectively.

Under section 107(1) of the Planning Act 2008, the...

Member
Amanda Solloway (Conservative)
Department
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written statements
Date
9 January 2024
Reference
HCWS170
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, whether (a) she and (b) the North Sea Transition Authority made an assessment of the potential impact of attaching conditions to the grant of consent to Equinor for the Rosebank oil and gas development in the North Sea...

Asked by
Caroline Lucas (Green Party)
Answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 October 2023
Reference
202951
House
House of Commons

Motion that this House has considered the environmental impacts of Rosebank oilfield. Motion lapsed.

Lead member
Caroline Lucas
Answering member
Graham Stuart
Department
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Debates
Date
28 June 2023
Reference
735 cc124-133WH
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered the environmental impacts of Rosebank oilfield.

It is a pleasure to serve under you, Mr Robertson, and to open this debate on the UK’s largest undeveloped oilfield. I want to put this debate firmly in the context of the escalating climate emergency. Quite...

Member
Caroline Lucas (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2023
Reference
735 c125WH
House
House of Commons

On the point about the use of renewable electricity for the extraction of oil, does the hon. Lady agree that it is disingenuous for lobby groups to talk about oilfields potentially saving carbon dioxide emissions? Does she also agree that comparing carbon emissions in the extraction of oil in the...

Member
Richard Foord (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2023
Reference
735 c126WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Member will not be surprised to hear that I do indeed agree. Unfortunately, an awful lot of greenwashing goes on when it comes to this debate.

Secondly, it is not just the UK that must reach net zero by 2050 if we are to avoid the worst effects of...

Member
Caroline Lucas (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2023
Reference
735 c126WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Lady for all the leadership she shows on these issues. Is it not also the case that a lot of our constituents are showing the way as well? They have probably communicated to most of us here today the passion they feel, and they understand the...

Member
Patrick Grady (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2023
Reference
735 c126WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is absolutely right. The majority of public opinion is on our side, and everyone from the Women’s Institute to the scientists is saying the same thing.

I want to talk about climate leadership. Approving Rosebank would destroy any last shred of the UK’s climate leadership. The UK’s record...

Member
Caroline Lucas (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2023
Reference
735 cc126-7WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Member for securing this valuable and important debate. I will speak freely and say that it is quite absurd that we are debating this issue today—the day after the four-year anniversary of the net zero target becoming law in the UK, and the morning that the...

Member
Olivia Blake (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2023
Reference
735 c127WH
House
House of Commons

I absolutely agree. In one sense, it is quite exquisite timing to have this debate and this discussion about Rosebank on the very morning of the CCC report, which is not only depressing but frankly damning when it comes to the Government’s lack of action. On leadership, I will quote...

Member
Caroline Lucas (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2023
Reference
735 c127WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Member on securing this important debate. Of course Rosebank oilfield should not go ahead, and of course it is an act of climate vandalism for it do so in the context of a climate emergency. Given the bogus arguments we hear from Government Ministers who justify...

Member
Richard Burgon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2023
Reference
735 c127WH
House
House of Commons

To reinforce what the hon. Member said, we know that the president of COP28 is going to be somebody who absolutely comes from that background, so it is not just a question of domestic collusion with oil companies. The big climate meeting happening later this year will be presided over...

Member
Caroline Lucas (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2023
Reference
735 cc127-9WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady is making a compelling argument against licensing new extraction at Rosebank, and one that I agree with. Does it not seem common sense to most people that reliance on oil and gas will not be reduced by drilling for more of it? The ordinary folk of this...

Member
Tommy Sheppard (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2023
Reference
735 c129WH
House
House of Commons

I broadly agree; I think it probably should be a devolved issue. I certainly think the Scottish Government are doing a much better job, with more progressive policies in the area of oil and gas. The hon. Gentleman would expect me to refer to the fact that there are Greens...

Member
Caroline Lucas (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2023
Reference
735 cc129-130WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Robertson. I congratulate the hon. Member for Brighton, Pavilion (Caroline Lucas) on securing this important debate and on bringing us back into the positions in which we often seem to be in this Chamber.

The hon. Lady made reference to the...

Member
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2023
Reference
735 cc130-1WH
House
House of Commons