Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,176 results for subject:Foxes

Type

-
Early day motions (21)
+ Legislation (11) + Acts (1)
-
Public acts (1)
+ Bills (9) + Public bills (9)
-
Government bills (2)
+ Private members' bills (7)
-
Ballot bills (4)
-
Ten minute rule bills (3)
+ Delegated legislation (1)
-
Statutory instruments (1)
+ Members' contributions (456)
-
Business questions (62)
-
Oral answers to questions (100)
-
Oral question time interventions (5)
+ Oral questions (102)
-
Prime Minister's questions (16)
-
Topical questions (3)
-
Proceeding contributions (244)
+ Parliamentary committees (52) + Committee proceedings (49)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (6)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (39)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (2)
-
Select Committee reports (3)
+ Parliamentary papers (28)
-
Command papers (1)
-
Consultation papers (2)
-
Deposited papers (20)
-
House of Commons papers (4)
-
House of Lords papers (1)
-
Impact assessments (2)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (104) + Debates (82)
-
Adjournment debates (5)
+ Committee proceedings (49)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (6)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (39)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (2)
-
e-petition debates (1)
+ Legislative debates (71)
-
Debates on bills (71)
+ Monarch's speech debates (1)
-
Queen's speech debates (1)
+ Petitions and observations (8)
-
Paper petitions (8)
+ Statements (9) + Oral statements (7)
-
Business statements (1)
-
Ministerial statements (6)
-
Written statements (2)
+ Parliamentary questions (716)
-
Business questions (62)
+ Oral questions (102)
-
Prime Minister's questions (16)
-
Topical questions (3)
-
Written questions (552)
+ Petitions and observations (8)
-
Paper petitions (8)
+ Research briefings (6)
-
Commons Briefing papers (5)
-
Commons Debate packs (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Noble Friend, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Baroness Hayman of Ullock), has made the following Written Statement today.

Today we are launching a consultation to seek views on how best to deliver an effective and enforceable ban on trail hunting in England and Wales....

Member
Angela Eagle (Labour)
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written statements
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
HCWS1473
House
House of Commons

Today we are launching a consultation to seek views on how best to deliver an effective and enforceable ban on trail hunting in England and Wales. The responses will be used to inform my department’s assessment of any potential social, community, economic, business or environmental impacts of a trail hunting...

Member
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written statements
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
HLWS1468
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the contribution of trail hunting to the rural economy.

Asked by
Earl of Leicester (Crossbench; Conservative)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 cc861-4
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for her response and I hope that the consultation will be a fair one. The Hunting Act was the result of 700 hours of debate, and it was what hunting opponents wanted. Hunts adapted and adopted trail-hunting, which is what supporters of the ban said that they should do. A recent socioeconomic survey stated that hunting contributes £100 million to the rural economy each year. A Countryside Alliance survey found that 97% of hunting participants believe the activity to benefit their physical and mental health. A ban on trail-hunting therefore runs contrary to the Government’s missions to promote economic growth and improve health outcomes. Surely further legislation targeting trail-hunting—

Asked by
Earl of Leicester (Crossbench; Conservative)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c861
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sorry—this is my first and last Oral Question, if the House will allow me some forbearance. As I was saying, further legislation is not necessary and it should not be a priority for the Government. It would represent yet another attack on the countryside and the...

Member
Earl of Leicester (Crossbench; Conservative)
Type
Oral question time interventions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c861
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the consultation has been designed to be open-handed and fair, so that all concerns, from both sides of the argument, can be heard and fully taken into account as we move forward to design the legislation. As I said, this is a manifesto commitment. It is important to point out that we believe that rural areas offer significant potential for growth and are central to our economy. There are many businesses that we can support within the rural communities to continue to bring forward greater productivity—rural productivity is less than urban productivity. We are doing our utmost to support the rural economy in many areas. One of the key areas in which we can do so is by improving our transport links.

Answered by
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c862
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg leave to ask the Question standing in my name on the Order Paper. In doing so, I refer the House to my interests as a landowner in Norfolk, over which trail-hunting has always taken place legally This includes the Nar Valley Bloodhounds, who come and play...

Member
Earl of Leicester (Crossbench; Conservative)
Type
Oral question time interventions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c861
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Government are committed to enacting a ban on trail-hunting, in line with our manifesto commitment, and will shortly be launching a consultation to seek views on how to deliver an effective, enforceable ban. The responses to that consultation will be used to inform our assessment of the potential impact of a ban on trail-hunting on the rural economy.

Answered by
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c861
House
House of Lords

Question!

Type
Oral question time interventions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c861
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my family, on our farm, has not allowed fox-hunting across that land for well over 40 years. However, as a student, I occasionally used to run cross-country with a piece of rope and a scented rag, and was pursued by hounds. I can assure the House that no animals were harmed in that process—I was left exhilarated but rather breathless. On an equally serious point, does the Minister agree that a higher priority should be to resource the police to deal with the rapidly rising tide of rural crime, including waste-tipping, theft and hare-coursing, rather than chasing after people who simply like to dress up and ride along a pre-set trail?

Asked by
Lord Cromwell (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c862
House
House of Lords

I commend the noble Lord on his earlier fitness—I do not know if he still carries it out. It is important to stress that there are no plans to include other activities, such as drag hunting and clean boot hunting, in the ban on trail-hunting. The noble Lord makes a really important point about enforcement. I have asked for a meeting with Home Office Ministers to discuss exactly that, in not just this area but others within Defra, as we feel that we need to work much more closely with the Home Office to ensure the enforcement of the laws that we bring in.

Answered by
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c862
House
House of Lords

My Lords, will the Minister undertake to ensure that any future decision in this area, particularly on trail-hunting, is evidence-led as much as possible and based on assessing whether it causes harm to animal welfare, biodiversity and public confidence in law? The economies of so many rural communities are extremely diverse, with many more people in the countryside participating in, for instance, rambling and orienteering than trail-hunting.

Asked by
Baroness Grender (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c862
House
House of Lords

I reassure the noble Baroness and all noble Lords that, when I look at future policy and legislation as part of my role as a Minister, it is incredibly important that everything is evidence-led and, where scientific evidence is needed, that we take the most up-to-date scientific evidence into account.

Answered by
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c862
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I come from a disadvantaged area where a ban on trail-hunting will be seen as a punch in the stomach by people who have already endured a considerable amount of distress as a result of other government policies. Some 20 years ago, after this House passed the Hunting Act, the then Prime Minister regretted what had happened and

particularly regretted having to spend 700 hours of parliamentary time on that legislation instead of on his priorities. He asked, “Why was I not told?” Please can the Minister go back and tell the current Prime Minister the same?

Asked by
Baroness Mallalieu (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c862
House
House of Lords

As I said, this is a manifesto commitment and it is my responsibility to deliver it. On the other concerns that my noble friend raised, we will start the consultation soon. I encourage people to look at it and take part, because it will be comprehensive.

Answered by
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c863
House
House of Lords

My Lords, our rural police forces are already overstretched, and banning a harmless country pursuit will simply stretch them further and alienate them from the community they protect. As has been discussed, hunting with dogs has already been banned by Parliament. This has resulted in only 52 convictions for organised hunts, with only one of those based on evidence collected by the police. Rather than now targeting trail-hunting, have the Government considered that laws that cannot be effectively enforced by the police are bad laws?

Asked by
Lord Roborough (Conservative; Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c863
House
House of Lords

It is also important to stress that, if there is a law, people should obey it.

Answered by
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c863
House
House of Lords

Are the Government aware of how important the supporters’ clubs of hunts are to the local communities? In the part of Devon where I live partly, the local communities in rural villages are very much separated from each other, and they all offer something on one Sunday, Saturday or Friday every week. If there is no supporters’ club, there will be very little for these rural communities to do in the winter.

Asked by
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c863
House
House of Lords

I live in a very rural community and always have done, and we have plenty of options for things to do in the winter that do not involve supporting hunts. If it is a particular concern in the area where the noble and learned Baroness lives, again, I encourage her to take part in the consultation.

Answered by
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c863
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister knows the countryside well, and she must know that huge numbers of jobs will be lost if trail-hunting is banned. What is the justification for this when so few people have been prosecuted for illegal hunting? If a couple of Peers behave badly, we get rid of them; we do not get rid of the whole House of Lords—surely she should look at that example.

Asked by
Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c863
House
House of Lords