Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,563 results for subject:GCHQ

Type

-
Early day motions (13)
+ Legislation (13) + Acts (2)
-
Public acts (2)
+ Bills (5) + Public bills (5)
-
Government bills (2)
+ Private members' bills (3)
-
Presentation bills (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (2)
+ Delegated legislation (6)
-
Statutory instruments (6)
+ Members' contributions (1,094)
-
Business questions (5)
-
Oral answers to questions (58)
+ Oral questions (58)
-
Prime Minister's questions (4)
-
Topical questions (4)
-
Proceeding contributions (978)
+ Parliamentary committees (35) + Committee proceedings (22)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (2)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (16)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
-
Select Committee reports (4)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (9)
+ Parliamentary papers (98)
-
Annual reports (17)
-
Command papers (34)
-
Deposited papers (27)
-
House of Commons papers (33)
-
House of Lords papers (3)
-
Unprinted command papers (2)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (71) + Debates (50)
-
Adjournment debates (7)
+ Committee proceedings (22)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (2)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (16)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
+ Legislative debates (35)
-
Debates on bills (33)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (2)
+ Monarch's speech debates (1)
-
Queen's speech debates (1)
-
Questions for short debate (2)
-
Private notice questions (1)
+ Statements (18) + Oral statements (4)
-
Ministerial statements (4)
-
Written statements (14)
-
Urgent questions (1)
+ Parliamentary questions (339)
-
Business questions (5)
+ Oral questions (58)
-
Prime Minister's questions (4)
-
Topical questions (4)
-
Private notice questions (1)
-
Urgent questions (1)
-
Written questions (274)
+ Research briefings (1) + Lords Library Briefings (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Topical (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I. Letter dated 03/09/2026 from Baroness Lloyd of Effra to Peers regarding the Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill committee stage debate (first day): questions concerning: the responsibility for proposed vendor risk management, and operation of the cost recovery regime. 2p. II. Letter dated 18/09/2026 from Baroness Lloyd...

Deposited by
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Deposited papers
Date
18 September 2026
Reference
DEP2026-0592
House
House of Lords

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what agreement has been reached with GCHQ regarding the use of Heron House by No.10 North; and whether any costs will be incurred by the Government as a result.

Asked by
Gregory Stafford (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
25278
House
House of Commons

New clause 2, discussed with new clauses 3, 13 and 15. New clause 2 negatived on division (6 votes to 8). New clause 3 negatived on division (6 votes to 9). New clause 4 negatived on division (6 votes to 9). New clause 5 negatived on division (6 votes to...

Lead member
Kanishka Narayan
Answering member
Ben Spencer
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Public Bill Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Committee
Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill Committee
Date
24 February 2026
House
House of Commons
Laid by
James Murray
Department
Treasury
Type
Annual reports; House of Commons papers
Date
4 November 2025
Reference
HC 1375 2024-26
House
House of Commons

I. Guide to the UK National Security Community. 79p. II. Letter dated 24/10/2025 from Dan Jarvis to the Deposited Papers clerk regarding deposit of ‘College for National Security - Guide to the UK National Security Community for deposit in the House Libraries. 1p.

Deposited by
Cabinet Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
24 October 2025
Reference
DEP2025-0706
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Shabana Mahmood
Department
Home Office
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
8 September 2025
Reference
SI 2025/998
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, with reference to the Prime Minister's oral contribution of 25 February 2025, Official Report, column 634, if he will make an assessment of the potential contribution of (a) GCHQ and (b) the Golden Valley Development in Cheltenham to the UK’s (i) intelligence...

Asked by
Max Wilkinson (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 March 2025
Reference
34014
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether any internship programmes at (a) MI5, (b) M16 and (c) GCHQ were open to people from white British backgrounds.

Asked by
Richard Holden (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 January 2025
Reference
22360
House
House of Commons

The Golden Valley development adjacent to GCHQ in Cheltenham will pay a vital role in our nation's cyber-security. The recent confirmation of £20 million from the Government for that development is welcome, but will the Secretary of State confirm that the project will continue to feature in future iterations of the national cyber strategy?

Asked by
Max Wilkinson (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
5 December 2024
Reference
758 c456
House
House of Commons

The best thing to do when it comes to a specific place is for me to look into the exact situation and come back to the hon. Member. I assure him, as I have said several times during this session, that cyber-security is extremely important to the Government. It is not just the Government's job; cyber-security has to be taken seriously by business and the whole of society. That is why we have the National Cyber Security Centre giving advice to bodies of all kinds to ensure that they are defended as well as possible.

Answered by
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
5 December 2024
Reference
758 c456
House
House of Commons
Laid by
James Murray
Department
Treasury
Type
Annual reports; House of Commons papers
Date
28 November 2024
Reference
HC 313 2024-25
House
House of Commons

Can the Foreign Secretary confirm that on his recent visit to the Indo-Pacific he raised the UK’s continued commitment to AUKUS and to general engagement on security in the region?

Member
Steve Race (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2024
Reference
755 c538
House
House of Commons

Absolutely. We are 100% committed to AUKUS, and the development of pillar 2 particularly.

Member
David Lammy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2024
Reference
755 c538
House
House of Commons

As I believe the Foreign Secretary is an honest man, I am perfectly prepared to accept that he raised these matters of human rights as forcefully as he says he did, so there must be something wrong with the Foreign Office’s reporting, because that forcefulness does not find its way...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2024
Reference
755 c538
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman is absolutely right to raise dependency. One thing that the China audit will look at is that very issue, and the assessment that he refers to is being made not just by us, but by our closest allies.

Member
David Lammy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2024
Reference
755 c538
House
House of Commons

Does the Secretary of State agree that the sanctions imposed on democratically elected Members of this House are wholly unacceptable, and what discussions did he have with Chinese counterparts to that effect?

Member
Phil Brickell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2024
Reference
755 c538
House
House of Commons

I told Wang Yi, the Foreign Minister, that it was not just unacceptable but counterproductive and that it needed to end. Those were my exact words.

Member
David Lammy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2024
Reference
755 c538
House
House of Commons

Of course we were all pleased to hear both the Foreign Secretary and the Prime Minister describe the release of Jimmy Lai as a priority. In the Foreign Secretary’s meeting with his Chinese counterpart, what priority was given to the release of Jimmy Lai, and given its priority status when...

Member
Brendan O'Hara (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2024
Reference
755 c538
House
House of Commons

“Progress” is Jimmy Lai’s release; that is the position of the UK Government. I cannot tell the hon. Gentleman when that will be, because we are not holding him; the Chinese are holding him. We continue to say that he should be released—that is our position.

Member
David Lammy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2024
Reference
755 c538
House
House of Commons

Does the Foreign Secretary agree that it is a travesty that Jimmy Lai remains detained, and that he should be released immediately to return to his family?

Member
Louise Sandher-Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2024
Reference
755 c538
House
House of Commons