1-20 of 1,787 results for subject:Honours
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.334 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.006 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Honours
- We searched for
- subject_t:Honours OR subject_ses:91546
Type
House
Session
More
Year
More
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, with reference to the Cabinet Office guidance Privacy information relating to honours nominations, updated 6 October 2026, whether additional safeguards are applied over the 20 year retention period for honours nomination data.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, with reference to the Cabinet Office guidance Privacy information relating to honours nominations, updated 6 October 2026, whether additional safeguards are applied over the 20 year retention period for honours nomination data.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, with reference to the Cabinet Office guidance Privacy information relating to honours nominations, updated 6 October 2026, whether the expression of a lawful political opinion may adversely affect a person’s eligibility or suitability for an honour.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, with reference to the Cabinet Office guidance Privacy information relating to honours nominations, updated 6 October 2026, whether the expression of a lawful political opinion may adversely affect a person’s eligibility or suitability for an honour.
Honours are considered on merit by one of ten independent honours committees.
As stated in our Honours Privacy Notice, as part of the honours process we collect and store personal data, including some special category data, which may include political opinions. There are no specific questions asked of nominees regarding their political opinions. Information is usually held where it is included in citations. For example, nominations considered by the independent Political and Parliamentary Service Committee will often contain details of political affiliation.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, further to the High Court (Administrative Court) Decision, [2026] EWHC 2466 (Admin), 6 October 2026, whether she plans to make any changes to the Honours Forfeiture process as a consequence of the ruling.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, further to the High Court (Administrative Court) Decision, [2026] EWHC 2466 (Admin), 6 October 2026, whether she plans to make any changes to the Honours Forfeiture process as a consequence of the ruling.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, with reference to the Cabinet Office guidance entitled Privacy information relating to honours nominations, updated 6 October 2026, what procedures are available to an honours nominee to establish whether information held concerning their political opinions is inaccurate and to seek its correction;...
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, with reference to the Cabinet Office guidance entitled Privacy information relating to honours nominations, updated 6 October 2026, what procedures are available to an honours nominee to establish whether information held concerning their political opinions is inaccurate and to seek its correction;...
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Wood of Anfield on 27 July (HL1937), on what date the British Ambassador to Bahrain, Alastair Long, informed the Bahraini authorities that he could not accept the award from King Hamad; to whom this was communicated; by what means;...
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Wood of Anfield on 27 July (HL1937), on what date the British Ambassador to Bahrain, Alastair Long, informed the Bahraini authorities that he could not accept the award from King Hamad; to whom this was communicated; by what means;...
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Wood of Anfield on 27 July (HL1937), on what grounds the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office has declined to disclose when the British Ambassador to Bahrain, Alastair Long, was first informed by the Bahraini authorities that King Hamad intended...
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Wood of Anfield on 27 July (HL1937), on what grounds the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office has declined to disclose when the British Ambassador to Bahrain, Alastair Long, was first informed by the Bahraini authorities that King Hamad intended...
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, if she will place a copy of the Honours Forfeiture Handbook in the Library.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, if she will place a copy of the Honours Forfeiture Handbook in the Library.
On the honours system, when are the next triennial reports and quinquennial review due, and will the public be able to contribute their views to them?
On the honours system, when are the next triennial reports and quinquennial review due, and will the public be able to contribute their views to them?
Although I have been part of the honours process, in short, I do not know the answer to the hon. Lady’s question. If she does not mind, I will take her questions away and get answers for her.
Although I have been part of the honours process, in short, I do not know the answer to the hon. Lady’s question. If she does not mind, I will take her questions away and get answers for her.
There is a well-established process for the revocation of honours. Any instance where a recipient may be deemed to have brought the honours system into disrepute can be considered by the independent Forfeiture Committee.
There is a well-established process for the revocation of honours. Any instance where a recipient may be deemed to have brought the honours system into disrepute can be considered by the independent Forfeiture Committee.
What steps her Department is taking to revoke the honours of disgraced individuals.
In December last year, the Independent Office for Police Conduct found that Sir Norman Bettison, the chief inspector for South Yorkshire police at the time of the Hillsborough disaster, would have had a case to answer for gross misconduct had he still been a serving officer today. This related to his role in the Hillsborough cover-up, his deliberate dishonesty in the aftermath of the disaster, and his lying about his involvement during his application for the post of chief constable of Merseyside police in 1998. Yesterday I wrote to the Prime Minister to ask whether the Forfeiture Committee has taken December’s finding into account. Can my hon. Friend confirm that that finding is being considered by the Committee? If not, will he make representations that it should be?
In December last year, the Independent Office for Police Conduct found that Sir Norman Bettison, the chief inspector for South Yorkshire police at the time of the Hillsborough disaster, would have had a case to answer for gross misconduct had he still been a serving officer today. This related to his role in the Hillsborough cover-up, his deliberate dishonesty in the aftermath of the disaster, and his lying about his involvement during his application for the post of chief constable of Merseyside police in 1998. Yesterday I wrote to the Prime Minister to ask whether the Forfeiture Committee has taken December’s finding into account. Can my hon. Friend confirm that that finding is being considered by the Committee? If not, will he make representations that it should be?
Let me start by paying tribute to my hon. Friend for his work on this issue. This Government are absolutely clear that nothing like the Hillsborough disaster must ever happen again. That is why the Public Office (Accountability) Bill will establish a new duty of candour and assistance at inquiries and investigations, backed by criminal sanctions. That will also extend to police misconduct investigations. My hon. Friend will understand why I am not in a position to comment on an individual case from the Floor of the House, but I reassure him that I have seen his correspondence with my predecessor on this question. I am looking at it very carefully.
Let me start by paying tribute to my hon. Friend for his work on this issue. This Government are absolutely clear that nothing like the Hillsborough disaster must ever happen again. That is why the Public Office (Accountability) Bill will establish a new duty of candour and assistance at inquiries and investigations, backed by criminal sanctions. That will also extend to police misconduct investigations. My hon. Friend will understand why I am not in a position to comment on an individual case from the Floor of the House, but I reassure him that I have seen his correspondence with my predecessor on this question. I am looking at it very carefully.
Let me start by paying tribute to my hon. Friend for his work on this issue. This Government are absolutely clear that nothing like the Hillsborough disaster must ever happen again. That is why the Public Office (Accountability) Bill will establish a new duty of candour and assistance at inquiries and investigations, backed by criminal sanctions. That will also extend to police misconduct investigations. My hon. Friend will understand why I am not in a position to comment on an individual case from the Floor of the House, but I reassure him that I have seen his correspondence with my predecessor on this question. I am looking at it very carefully.
In December last year, the Independent Office for Police Conduct found that Sir Norman Bettison, the chief inspector for South Yorkshire police at the time of the Hillsborough disaster, would have had a case to answer for gross misconduct had he still been a serving officer today. This related to his role in the Hillsborough cover-up, his deliberate dishonesty in the aftermath of the disaster, and his lying about his involvement during his application for the post of chief constable of Merseyside police in 1998. Yesterday I wrote to the Prime Minister to ask whether the Forfeiture Committee has taken December’s finding into account. Can my hon. Friend confirm that that finding is being considered by the Committee? If not, will he make representations that it should be?
What steps her Department is taking to revoke the honours of disgraced individuals.
What steps her Department is taking to revoke the honours of disgraced individuals.
There is a well-established process for the revocation of honours. Any instance where a recipient may be deemed to have brought the honours system into disrepute can be considered by the independent Forfeiture Committee.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether the new Prime Minister has set out his priorities for the honours system.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether the new Prime Minister has set out his priorities for the honours system.
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Chapman of Darlington on 6 July (HL1195), regarding the award conferred on the UK Ambassador to Bahrain on 21 June, why they did not state whether the Kingdom of Bahrain sought prior permission from the Honours Secretariat, given the...
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Chapman of Darlington on 6 July (HL1195), regarding the award conferred on the UK Ambassador to Bahrain on 21 June, why they did not state whether the Kingdom of Bahrain sought prior permission from the Honours Secretariat, given the...
Before the award was conferred, the Ambassador informed the Bahraini authorities that he could not accept it under UK policy. The Government of Bahrain did not seek the required Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) permission, and the Ambassador's handling was consistent with the advice provided by the FCDO.
To ask His Majesty's Government how many honours, by each award level, were received in each region or nation of the UK in the 2026 Birthday Honours; and what percentage of the population of each such region or nation that number represents.
To ask His Majesty's Government how many honours, by each award level, were received in each region or nation of the UK in the 2026 Birthday Honours; and what percentage of the population of each such region or nation that number represents.
Statistical information held in relation to the regional breakdown of all 1182 recipients for the 2026 Birthday Honours List can be found below. Percentages are rounded to 1 decimal point. Data for CBE and higher levels has been aggregated and is also included below. Data reflects the correspondence address provided by recipients.
Data is collected using city/town and county, then aggregated into regional figures at the time that the recipients were sounded for an award, not when they were originally nominated. There were 16 individuals who noted their location as South Yorkshire in the 2026 Birthday Honours List, 3 of which were above OBE level. There were 3 individuals who noted their location as Sheffield.
Information on the number of nominations by mayoral authority in South Yorkshire is not captured, as we are unable to break down the data in that way. However, of those who listed their location as South Yorkshire, 7 individuals received an award above MBE level.
53 recipients of honours in the 2026 Birthday Honours List have received honours in previous lists.
This data relates only to the main Prime Minister’s List and does not include data from the Defence List or the Overseas and International List, which are not administered by the Cabinet Office.
Transparency data for the list by county, the level of award received and the service for which each recipient has been recognised, as well as information on recipients recognised in previous honours lists, is publicly available on gov.uk.
Honours are awarded on merit basis. A key aim of the honours system is to ensure that it is more representative of the country as a whole and we will continue to encourage more nominations from every corner of the UK, including South Yorkshire, in future honours lists.
Region | BEM | BEM% | MBE | MBE% | OBE | OBE% | CBE & Higher | CBE & higher% | Total | % of the total BD26 list living in each region | % of UK population |
East | 23 | 7.5% | 46 | 9.2% | 15 | 6.3% | 12 | 9.3% | 96 | 8.1% | 9.3% |
East Midlands | 10 | 2.8% | 15 | 3.0% | 14 | 5.8% | 6 | 4.7% | 45 | 3.8% | 7.2% |
London | 35 | 11.4% | 76 | 15.2% | 54 | 22.5% | 45 | 34.9% | 210 | 17.7% | 13.4% |
North East | 8 | 2.6% | 10 | 2.0% | 8 | 3.3% | 4 | 3.1% | 30 | 2.5% | 4.0% |
North West | 32 | 10.5% | 35 | 7.0% | 19 | 7.9% | 8 | 6.2% | 94 | 7.9% | 11.0% |
Northern Ireland | 29 | 9.5% | 40 | 8.0% | 9 | 3.8% | 3 | 2.3% | 81 | 6.9% | 2.8% |
Scotland | 29 | 9.5% | 44 | 8.8% | 21 | 8.8% | 8 | 6.2% | 102 | 8.6% | 8.2% |
South East | 39 | 12.7% | 93 | 18.6% | 44 | 18.3% | 27 | 20.9% | 203 | 16.9% | 13.7% |
South West | 29 | 9.5% | 32 | 6.4% | 19 | 7.9% | 6 | 4.7% | 86 | 7.3% | 8.4% |
Wales | 19 | 6.2% | 32 | 6.4% | 10 | 4.2% | 5 | 3.9% | 66 | 5.6% | 4.7% |
West Midlands | 25 | 8.2% | 43 | 8.6% | 11 | 4.6% | 5 | 3.9% | 84 | 7.1% | 8.9% |
Yorkshire & Humberside | 28 | 9.2% | 35 | 7.0% | 15 | 6.3% | 5 | 3.9% | 83 | 7% | 8.2% |
Living abroad | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.8% | 1 | 0.8% | 3 | - | - |
Total | 306 | 100% | 501 | 100% | 240 | 100% | 129 | 100% | 1182 | 100% | - |
To ask His Majesty's Government how many honours above OBE level were awarded to people who were (1) living in, or (2) working or providing service to, the South Yorkshire area at the time of their nomination for an honour in the 2026 Birthday Honours list.
To ask His Majesty's Government how many honours above OBE level were awarded to people who were (1) living in, or (2) working or providing service to, the South Yorkshire area at the time of their nomination for an honour in the 2026 Birthday Honours list.
Statistical information held in relation to the regional breakdown of all 1182 recipients for the 2026 Birthday Honours List can be found below. Percentages are rounded to 1 decimal point. Data for CBE and higher levels has been aggregated and is also included below. Data reflects the correspondence address provided by recipients.
Data is collected using city/town and county, then aggregated into regional figures at the time that the recipients were sounded for an award, not when they were originally nominated. There were 16 individuals who noted their location as South Yorkshire in the 2026 Birthday Honours List, 3 of which were above OBE level. There were 3 individuals who noted their location as Sheffield.
Information on the number of nominations by mayoral authority in South Yorkshire is not captured, as we are unable to break down the data in that way. However, of those who listed their location as South Yorkshire, 7 individuals received an award above MBE level.
53 recipients of honours in the 2026 Birthday Honours List have received honours in previous lists.
This data relates only to the main Prime Minister’s List and does not include data from the Defence List or the Overseas and International List, which are not administered by the Cabinet Office.
Transparency data for the list by county, the level of award received and the service for which each recipient has been recognised, as well as information on recipients recognised in previous honours lists, is publicly available on gov.uk.
Honours are awarded on merit basis. A key aim of the honours system is to ensure that it is more representative of the country as a whole and we will continue to encourage more nominations from every corner of the UK, including South Yorkshire, in future honours lists.
Region | BEM | BEM% | MBE | MBE% | OBE | OBE% | CBE & Higher | CBE & higher% | Total | % of the total BD26 list living in each region | % of UK population |
East | 23 | 7.5% | 46 | 9.2% | 15 | 6.3% | 12 | 9.3% | 96 | 8.1% | 9.3% |
East Midlands | 10 | 2.8% | 15 | 3.0% | 14 | 5.8% | 6 | 4.7% | 45 | 3.8% | 7.2% |
London | 35 | 11.4% | 76 | 15.2% | 54 | 22.5% | 45 | 34.9% | 210 | 17.7% | 13.4% |
North East | 8 | 2.6% | 10 | 2.0% | 8 | 3.3% | 4 | 3.1% | 30 | 2.5% | 4.0% |
North West | 32 | 10.5% | 35 | 7.0% | 19 | 7.9% | 8 | 6.2% | 94 | 7.9% | 11.0% |
Northern Ireland | 29 | 9.5% | 40 | 8.0% | 9 | 3.8% | 3 | 2.3% | 81 | 6.9% | 2.8% |
Scotland | 29 | 9.5% | 44 | 8.8% | 21 | 8.8% | 8 | 6.2% | 102 | 8.6% | 8.2% |
South East | 39 | 12.7% | 93 | 18.6% | 44 | 18.3% | 27 | 20.9% | 203 | 16.9% | 13.7% |
South West | 29 | 9.5% | 32 | 6.4% | 19 | 7.9% | 6 | 4.7% | 86 | 7.3% | 8.4% |
Wales | 19 | 6.2% | 32 | 6.4% | 10 | 4.2% | 5 | 3.9% | 66 | 5.6% | 4.7% |
West Midlands | 25 | 8.2% | 43 | 8.6% | 11 | 4.6% | 5 | 3.9% | 84 | 7.1% | 8.9% |
Yorkshire & Humberside | 28 | 9.2% | 35 | 7.0% | 15 | 6.3% | 5 | 3.9% | 83 | 7% | 8.2% |
Living abroad | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.8% | 1 | 0.8% | 3 | - | - |
Total | 306 | 100% | 501 | 100% | 240 | 100% | 129 | 100% | 1182 | 100% | - |
To ask His Majesty's Government how many honours above OBE level were awarded to people who were (1) living in, or (2) working or providing service to, the Sheffield City Region at the time of their nomination for an honour in the 2026 Birthday Honours list.
To ask His Majesty's Government how many honours above OBE level were awarded to people who were (1) living in, or (2) working or providing service to, the Sheffield City Region at the time of their nomination for an honour in the 2026 Birthday Honours list.
Statistical information held in relation to the regional breakdown of all 1182 recipients for the 2026 Birthday Honours List can be found below. Percentages are rounded to 1 decimal point. Data for CBE and higher levels has been aggregated and is also included below. Data reflects the correspondence address provided by recipients.
Data is collected using city/town and county, then aggregated into regional figures at the time that the recipients were sounded for an award, not when they were originally nominated. There were 16 individuals who noted their location as South Yorkshire in the 2026 Birthday Honours List, 3 of which were above OBE level. There were 3 individuals who noted their location as Sheffield.
Information on the number of nominations by mayoral authority in South Yorkshire is not captured, as we are unable to break down the data in that way. However, of those who listed their location as South Yorkshire, 7 individuals received an award above MBE level.
53 recipients of honours in the 2026 Birthday Honours List have received honours in previous lists.
This data relates only to the main Prime Minister’s List and does not include data from the Defence List or the Overseas and International List, which are not administered by the Cabinet Office.
Transparency data for the list by county, the level of award received and the service for which each recipient has been recognised, as well as information on recipients recognised in previous honours lists, is publicly available on gov.uk.
Honours are awarded on merit basis. A key aim of the honours system is to ensure that it is more representative of the country as a whole and we will continue to encourage more nominations from every corner of the UK, including South Yorkshire, in future honours lists.
Region | BEM | BEM% | MBE | MBE% | OBE | OBE% | CBE & Higher | CBE & higher% | Total | % of the total BD26 list living in each region | % of UK population |
East | 23 | 7.5% | 46 | 9.2% | 15 | 6.3% | 12 | 9.3% | 96 | 8.1% | 9.3% |
East Midlands | 10 | 2.8% | 15 | 3.0% | 14 | 5.8% | 6 | 4.7% | 45 | 3.8% | 7.2% |
London | 35 | 11.4% | 76 | 15.2% | 54 | 22.5% | 45 | 34.9% | 210 | 17.7% | 13.4% |
North East | 8 | 2.6% | 10 | 2.0% | 8 | 3.3% | 4 | 3.1% | 30 | 2.5% | 4.0% |
North West | 32 | 10.5% | 35 | 7.0% | 19 | 7.9% | 8 | 6.2% | 94 | 7.9% | 11.0% |
Northern Ireland | 29 | 9.5% | 40 | 8.0% | 9 | 3.8% | 3 | 2.3% | 81 | 6.9% | 2.8% |
Scotland | 29 | 9.5% | 44 | 8.8% | 21 | 8.8% | 8 | 6.2% | 102 | 8.6% | 8.2% |
South East | 39 | 12.7% | 93 | 18.6% | 44 | 18.3% | 27 | 20.9% | 203 | 16.9% | 13.7% |
South West | 29 | 9.5% | 32 | 6.4% | 19 | 7.9% | 6 | 4.7% | 86 | 7.3% | 8.4% |
Wales | 19 | 6.2% | 32 | 6.4% | 10 | 4.2% | 5 | 3.9% | 66 | 5.6% | 4.7% |
West Midlands | 25 | 8.2% | 43 | 8.6% | 11 | 4.6% | 5 | 3.9% | 84 | 7.1% | 8.9% |
Yorkshire & Humberside | 28 | 9.2% | 35 | 7.0% | 15 | 6.3% | 5 | 3.9% | 83 | 7% | 8.2% |
Living abroad | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.8% | 1 | 0.8% | 3 | - | - |
Total | 306 | 100% | 501 | 100% | 240 | 100% | 129 | 100% | 1182 | 100% | - |
To ask His Majesty's Government how many residents in the South Yorkshire Mayoral Combined Authority received an award above the level of MBE in the 2026 Birthday Honours.
To ask His Majesty's Government how many residents in the South Yorkshire Mayoral Combined Authority received an award above the level of MBE in the 2026 Birthday Honours.
Statistical information held in relation to the regional breakdown of all 1182 recipients for the 2026 Birthday Honours List can be found below. Percentages are rounded to 1 decimal point. Data for CBE and higher levels has been aggregated and is also included below. Data reflects the correspondence address provided by recipients.
Data is collected using city/town and county, then aggregated into regional figures at the time that the recipients were sounded for an award, not when they were originally nominated. There were 16 individuals who noted their location as South Yorkshire in the 2026 Birthday Honours List, 3 of which were above OBE level. There were 3 individuals who noted their location as Sheffield.
Information on the number of nominations by mayoral authority in South Yorkshire is not captured, as we are unable to break down the data in that way. However, of those who listed their location as South Yorkshire, 7 individuals received an award above MBE level.
53 recipients of honours in the 2026 Birthday Honours List have received honours in previous lists.
This data relates only to the main Prime Minister’s List and does not include data from the Defence List or the Overseas and International List, which are not administered by the Cabinet Office.
Transparency data for the list by county, the level of award received and the service for which each recipient has been recognised, as well as information on recipients recognised in previous honours lists, is publicly available on gov.uk.
Honours are awarded on merit basis. A key aim of the honours system is to ensure that it is more representative of the country as a whole and we will continue to encourage more nominations from every corner of the UK, including South Yorkshire, in future honours lists.
Region | BEM | BEM% | MBE | MBE% | OBE | OBE% | CBE & Higher | CBE & higher% | Total | % of the total BD26 list living in each region | % of UK population |
East | 23 | 7.5% | 46 | 9.2% | 15 | 6.3% | 12 | 9.3% | 96 | 8.1% | 9.3% |
East Midlands | 10 | 2.8% | 15 | 3.0% | 14 | 5.8% | 6 | 4.7% | 45 | 3.8% | 7.2% |
London | 35 | 11.4% | 76 | 15.2% | 54 | 22.5% | 45 | 34.9% | 210 | 17.7% | 13.4% |
North East | 8 | 2.6% | 10 | 2.0% | 8 | 3.3% | 4 | 3.1% | 30 | 2.5% | 4.0% |
North West | 32 | 10.5% | 35 | 7.0% | 19 | 7.9% | 8 | 6.2% | 94 | 7.9% | 11.0% |
Northern Ireland | 29 | 9.5% | 40 | 8.0% | 9 | 3.8% | 3 | 2.3% | 81 | 6.9% | 2.8% |
Scotland | 29 | 9.5% | 44 | 8.8% | 21 | 8.8% | 8 | 6.2% | 102 | 8.6% | 8.2% |
South East | 39 | 12.7% | 93 | 18.6% | 44 | 18.3% | 27 | 20.9% | 203 | 16.9% | 13.7% |
South West | 29 | 9.5% | 32 | 6.4% | 19 | 7.9% | 6 | 4.7% | 86 | 7.3% | 8.4% |
Wales | 19 | 6.2% | 32 | 6.4% | 10 | 4.2% | 5 | 3.9% | 66 | 5.6% | 4.7% |
West Midlands | 25 | 8.2% | 43 | 8.6% | 11 | 4.6% | 5 | 3.9% | 84 | 7.1% | 8.9% |
Yorkshire & Humberside | 28 | 9.2% | 35 | 7.0% | 15 | 6.3% | 5 | 3.9% | 83 | 7% | 8.2% |
Living abroad | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.8% | 1 | 0.8% | 3 | - | - |
Total | 306 | 100% | 501 | 100% | 240 | 100% | 129 | 100% | 1182 | 100% | - |
To ask His Majesty's Government how many recipients of honours in the 2026 Birthday Honours have received recognition in previous honours lists.
To ask His Majesty's Government how many recipients of honours in the 2026 Birthday Honours have received recognition in previous honours lists.
Statistical information held in relation to the regional breakdown of all 1182 recipients for the 2026 Birthday Honours List can be found below. Percentages are rounded to 1 decimal point. Data for CBE and higher levels has been aggregated and is also included below. Data reflects the correspondence address provided by recipients.
Data is collected using city/town and county, then aggregated into regional figures at the time that the recipients were sounded for an award, not when they were originally nominated. There were 16 individuals who noted their location as South Yorkshire in the 2026 Birthday Honours List, 3 of which were above OBE level. There were 3 individuals who noted their location as Sheffield.
Information on the number of nominations by mayoral authority in South Yorkshire is not captured, as we are unable to break down the data in that way. However, of those who listed their location as South Yorkshire, 7 individuals received an award above MBE level.
53 recipients of honours in the 2026 Birthday Honours List have received honours in previous lists.
This data relates only to the main Prime Minister’s List and does not include data from the Defence List or the Overseas and International List, which are not administered by the Cabinet Office.
Transparency data for the list by county, the level of award received and the service for which each recipient has been recognised, as well as information on recipients recognised in previous honours lists, is publicly available on gov.uk.
Honours are awarded on merit basis. A key aim of the honours system is to ensure that it is more representative of the country as a whole and we will continue to encourage more nominations from every corner of the UK, including South Yorkshire, in future honours lists.
Region | BEM | BEM% | MBE | MBE% | OBE | OBE% | CBE & Higher | CBE & higher% | Total | % of the total BD26 list living in each region | % of UK population |
East | 23 | 7.5% | 46 | 9.2% | 15 | 6.3% | 12 | 9.3% | 96 | 8.1% | 9.3% |
East Midlands | 10 | 2.8% | 15 | 3.0% | 14 | 5.8% | 6 | 4.7% | 45 | 3.8% | 7.2% |
London | 35 | 11.4% | 76 | 15.2% | 54 | 22.5% | 45 | 34.9% | 210 | 17.7% | 13.4% |
North East | 8 | 2.6% | 10 | 2.0% | 8 | 3.3% | 4 | 3.1% | 30 | 2.5% | 4.0% |
North West | 32 | 10.5% | 35 | 7.0% | 19 | 7.9% | 8 | 6.2% | 94 | 7.9% | 11.0% |
Northern Ireland | 29 | 9.5% | 40 | 8.0% | 9 | 3.8% | 3 | 2.3% | 81 | 6.9% | 2.8% |
Scotland | 29 | 9.5% | 44 | 8.8% | 21 | 8.8% | 8 | 6.2% | 102 | 8.6% | 8.2% |
South East | 39 | 12.7% | 93 | 18.6% | 44 | 18.3% | 27 | 20.9% | 203 | 16.9% | 13.7% |
South West | 29 | 9.5% | 32 | 6.4% | 19 | 7.9% | 6 | 4.7% | 86 | 7.3% | 8.4% |
Wales | 19 | 6.2% | 32 | 6.4% | 10 | 4.2% | 5 | 3.9% | 66 | 5.6% | 4.7% |
West Midlands | 25 | 8.2% | 43 | 8.6% | 11 | 4.6% | 5 | 3.9% | 84 | 7.1% | 8.9% |
Yorkshire & Humberside | 28 | 9.2% | 35 | 7.0% | 15 | 6.3% | 5 | 3.9% | 83 | 7% | 8.2% |
Living abroad | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.8% | 1 | 0.8% | 3 | - | - |
Total | 306 | 100% | 501 | 100% | 240 | 100% | 129 | 100% | 1182 | 100% | - |