Skip to main content

1-20 of 2,305 results for subject:Injunctions

Type

-
Early day motions (1)
+ Legislation (11) + Acts (2)
-
Public acts (2)
+ Bills (5) + Public bills (5)
-
Government bills (4)
+ Private members' bills (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (4)
-
Statutory instruments (4)
+ Members' contributions (1,991)
-
Business questions (4)
-
Maiden speeches (2)
-
Oral answers to questions (32)
+ Oral questions (34)
-
Prime Minister's questions (3)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (1,924)
-
Speaker's rulings (1)
+ Parliamentary committees (70) + Committee proceedings (61)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (11)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (2)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (22)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (22)
-
Select Committee reports (6)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (2)
-
Select Committee written evidence (3)
+ Parliamentary papers (55)
-
Command papers (3)
-
Consultation papers (2)
-
Deposited papers (15)
-
House of Commons papers (27)
-
House of Lords papers (6)
-
Impact assessments (4)
-
Unprinted papers (3)
-
White papers (2)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (117) + Debates (87)
-
Adjournment debates (2)
+ Committee proceedings (61)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (11)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (2)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (22)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (22)
-
Debates on select committee reports (1)
+ Legislative debates (58)
-
Debates on bills (53)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (5)
+ Monarch's speech debates (1)
-
Queen's speech debates (1)
-
Questions for short debate (1)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (1)
-
Private notice questions (1)
+ Statements (26) + Oral statements (6)
-
Ministerial statements (5)
-
Personal statements (1)
-
Written statements (20)
-
Urgent questions (2)
+ Parliamentary questions (179)
-
Business questions (4)
+ Oral questions (34)
-
Prime Minister's questions (3)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Private notice questions (1)
-
Urgent questions (2)
-
Written questions (138)
+ Research briefings (13)
-
Commons Briefing papers (8)
-
Commons Debate packs (1)
+ Lords In Focus (1)
-
Lords In Focus - Debates (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (3)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (2)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Levitt
Answering member
Lord Keen of Elie
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
30 June 2026
Reference
857 cc440-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I begin with a brief explanation of what this instrument is not. It is not a mechanism for extending legal aid, and it does not represent a change to legal aid policy. It does not introduce any new pressure on legal aid, and thus we do not expect...

Member
Baroness Levitt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2026
Reference
857 cc440-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for laying this instrument. We on these Benches support the order. As the Minister explained, this is a largely technical instrument. It ensures that legal aid continues to be available where new civil orders introduced by the Crime and Policing Act replace or mirror...

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2026
Reference
857 cc442-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble and learned Lord, Lord Keen of Elie, for welcoming this statutory instrument. The answer to his question on the legal aid agencies is yes; we are ready for that. This instrument, as the noble and learned Lord said, is a necessary step...

Member
Baroness Levitt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2026
Reference
857 c443GC
House
House of Lords

Local agencies have various powers to respond to anti-social behaviour. These powers are being strengthened by the Crime and Policing Act 2026.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
CBP-7270
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Defence Committee
Date
19 May 2026
Reference
HC 69 2026-27
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Defence Committee
Date
28 April 2026
Reference
HC 1304 2024-26
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Defence Committee
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
HC 1304 2024-26
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether the Government has considered establishing periodic review procedures for High Court injunctions granting lifelong anonymity to offenders convicted of serious crimes committed as juveniles.

Asked by
Andrew Snowden (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 March 2026
Reference
118304
House
House of Commons

Lords report stage first day. Amendment 1 disagreed to on division (86 to 178). Amendment 4 agreed to. Amendment 7 agreed to on division (205 to 188). Amendment 11 agreed to. Amendment 13 agreed to on division (213 to 150). Amendments 15 to 17 agreed to. Amendment 18 disagreed to...

Lead member
Lord Hanson of Flint; Lord Katz
Answering member
Lord Davies of Gower; Lord Cameron of Lochiel
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills
Notes
Northern Ireland legislative consent granted, Scottish and Welsh legislative consent sought.
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc612-660
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Doocey

1: Clause 1, page 2, line 4, leave out “just and convenient” and insert “necessary and proportionate”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment amends the test for imposing a respect order to require the court to be satisfied that it is necessary and proportionate to make the order for the purpose...

Member
Baroness Doocey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c612
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise to the House; I was not ready, but it is worth waiting for. This amendment would change the legal test for imposing a respect order, requiring the court to consider this step “necessary and proportionate”, and not merely “just and convenient”, in preventing a person engaging...

Member
Baroness Doocey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc612-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with everything said by the noble Baroness, Lady Doocey. As I understand the Government’s position, they accept that it would not be appropriate to impose such an order unless it is necessary and proportionate, and indeed that is the test applied by the European Convention on...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c613
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there is a lot in this group. The Government are undoubtedly sincere in wanting to use the Bill to further tackle anti-social behaviour, and such moves to take on this blight on communities will certainly be popular. However, we have to pause a moment and say that there...

Member
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc614-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak to the amendment tabled in my name. As noble Lords know, I am terrible with the billion rules that we have in this place, so bear with me. This amendment would make a small change that would make a big difference to many residents around...

Member
Lord Bailey of Paddington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c617
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak to the amendments in my noble friend Lady Doocey’s name and mine, which seek to ensure that the Government’s new anti-social behaviour powers are grounded in evidence, proportionality and democratic accountability, as well as to other amendments in this group.

On these Benches, we do not...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc617-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it will come as no surprise to the Minister that these Benches maintain our opposition to the Government’s respect orders. We have heard, in Committee and today, many concerns about the new regime. Our concerns are slightly different from some of those expressed by other noble Lords, in...

Member
Lord Cameron of Lochiel (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc619-620
House
House of Lords

It is good to be back, is it not? It feels like we have been away for ages and now here we are again, back for another session of interesting amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill. I am grateful to all noble Lords for tabling them.

As the noble Lord,...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc620-1
House
House of Lords

Would the Minister accept that it is very difficult ever to think of circumstances in which it would be appropriate for a court to impose a respect order, with all the implications that has for an individual, unless the court is satisfied that it is necessary and proportionate?

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c621
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord has made his point. I am trying to give the defence from the Government’s perspective. That is our view. He has made a reasonable point, but that is our view and I hope he accepts our comments on those issues in good faith.

On Amendment 2, I hope...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc621-3
House
House of Lords