Skip to main content

1-20 of 265 results for subject:M20

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what discussions her Department is having with the Kent and Medway Resilience Forum, National Highways, and other stakeholders on eliminating the need for the deployment of Operation Brock to be deployed on the M20.

Asked by
Sojan Joseph (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 July 2026
Reference
17580
House
House of Commons

That this House express its disappointment that Operation Brock will be in place on the M20 from 14 July until 24 August; notes that the continued use of the contraflow system causes delays and widespread disruption to residents and local businesses in East Kent; further notes that in 2025 the...

Primary sponsor
Sojan Joseph (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
13 July 2026
Reference
579
House
House of Commons

Operation Brock

The petition of residents of the constituency of Ashford in Kent,

Declares that the deployment of Operation Brock by Kent County Council and the Kent and Medway Resilience Forum to queue freight lorries on the M20 causes severe disruption for residents and local businesses; further that although reassurances had been...

Lead member
Lilian Greenwood
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Observations on petitions
Date
1 September 2025
Reference
772 cc8-10P
House
House of Commons

Operation Brock

I rise to present a petition on behalf of my constituents, who are deeply frustrated by the regular deployment of Operation Brock. The decision by Kent county council and the Kent and Medway resilience forum to queue freight lorries on the M20 during the school holidays causes severe disruption...

Lead member
Sojan Joseph
Type
Paper petitions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
771 cc389-391
House
House of Commons

We understand the disruption and inconvenience caused when Operation Brock is deployed in Kent. Unfortunately, it is sometimes necessary, but I will ensure that a Minister comes back to my hon. Friend about how this can be done in a more sensitive way, especially during the school holidays.

Member
Lucy Powell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 April 2025
Reference
765 c451
House
House of Commons

I have previously raised in this House how the use of Operation Brock to queue freight lorries heading to Dover on the M20 causes disruption to large parts of my constituency. My constituents are not against it being used as an emergency traffic-calming measure, but I have been extremely disappointed...

Member
Sojan Joseph (Labour)
Type
Business questions
Date
3 April 2025
Reference
765 c451
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether she has had recent discussions with the Highways Agency on increasing the height of the railings on the A28 overbridge over the M20 between junctions 9 and 10.

Asked by
Sojan Joseph (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 February 2025
Reference
27725
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department has made an assessment of the potential impact of reopening Ramsgate Port to international passengers on levels of (a) capacity pressure experienced by (i) the Port of Dover and (ii) other ports in the South East of England and...

Asked by
Polly Billington (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 October 2024
Reference
8532
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department has made an assessment of the potential impact of reopening Ramsgate Port to international trade on levels of (a) capacity pressure experienced by (i) the Port of Dover and (ii) other ports in the South East of England and...

Asked by
Polly Billington (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
8531
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether she plans to take steps to improve traffic management on the M20.

Asked by
Helen Grant (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 September 2024
Reference
2860
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Mark Harper
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
16 October 2023
Reference
SI 2023/1077
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

What assessment he has made of the progress of works on the M20 to support Operation Brock.

Asked by
Damian Green (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Withdrawn
Date
12 January 2023
Reference
903155
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government whether the M20 three lane carriageway speed limit will be raised from 50 miles per hour given the suspension of Operation Brock and the removal of motorway barriers; and if not, why not.

Asked by
Lord West of Spithead (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 September 2022
Reference
HL2317
House
House of Lords

Motions to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Trudy Harrison
Answering member
Kerry McCarthy
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Fourth Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
20 October 2021
House
House of Commons

My Lords, the two instruments that I am speaking to today, along with the Heavy Commercial Vehicles in Kent (No. 3) Amendment (No. 2) Order 2021, are a package of measures and it is important that they should be debated together. I am grateful to the House for facilitating this....

Member
Baroness Vere of Norbiton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
815 cc24-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend on the Front Bench for expanding a little on what is in orders No. 1 and No. 2. I took the opportunity to have brief consultations with some hauliers in my former constituency of Northampton South. I will go through the...

Member
Lord Naseby (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
815 cc25-6GC
House
House of Lords

I start by thanking the Minister for her explanation. I share some of the noble Lord’s concerns. I have real concerns about these SIs. Although they seem to be perfectly reasonable attempts to introduce a more systematic way of dealing with the pressures on Kent roads and ports, especially Dover,...

Member
Baroness Randerson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
815 cc26-8GC
House
House of Lords

Again, I too thank the Minister for her explanation of the purpose and content of the orders we are discussing.

The Department for Transport has said that Operation Brock was originally created to deal with disruption caused by our exit from the European Union and then in response to the Covid-19...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
815 cc28-30GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords for their considered contributions today. I hope to put their minds at rest—but also I shall write, because I do not quite have all the answers to the questions. That always annoys me a bit, but I shall do my best.

Briefly, I would...

Member
Baroness Vere of Norbiton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
815 c30GC
House
House of Lords

To return to discussing the Operation Brock traffic management scheme, maybe I can take noble Lords back, not as far as previously but just a couple of years, to when we bought the quick movable barrier. This was an opportunistic purchase; someone came along and said, “Oh look, there is...

Member
Baroness Vere of Norbiton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
815 cc31-3GC
House
House of Lords