Skip to main content

1-20 of 49 results for subject:M65

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

In 2021, we asked National Highways to undertake a study looking at possible interventions on or around the M65 at Colne. That study focused on localised congestion pinch points on that road, which is owned and managed by Lancashire County Council. It concluded in 2022, and the findings were handed over to the council and Transport for the North. It is for them to decide what further action they may wish to take as a result, but I know they will, and they certainly should, attend closely to what my hon. Friend said.

Answered by
Jesse Norman (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 June 2023
Reference
733 c872
House
House of Commons

Junction 11 of the M65 currently only allows traffic to join going eastwards towards Colne, where the motorway ends, and not westwards towards the M6, opening up the whole country. The result is a majorly congested Burnley town centre and a limit to economic opportunity. Could my right hon. Friend set out what funding opportunities are available for a viability study into a westwards slip road?

Asked by
Antony Higginbotham (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Topical questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
8 June 2023
Reference
733 c872
House
House of Commons
M65

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what plans he has to work with Transport for the North to expand the M65 to Bradford and Leeds.

Asked by
Graham P Jones (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 September 2019
Reference
282295
House
House of Commons

What assessment he has made of the potential merits of extending the M65 from Colne to Keighley.

Asked by
Graham P Jones (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
5 July 2018
Reference
906265; 644 cc473-4
House
House of Commons

Highways England has gathered evidence about the performance of the strategic road network, and future pressures on it, to inform the decisions we have taken as part of the second road investment strategy. This process of evidence gathering and public consultation has taken into consideration the idea of extending the M65.

Answered by
Jesse Norman (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
5 July 2018
Reference
644 c473
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State has invested in the idea of a rail link between Liverpool and Hull, connecting the east and west through the central low Pennines. Do the Government accept that a road link would be complementary? It would go through deprived communities and provide a huge economic uplift. Do the Government recognise that this is the great northern powerhouse project?

Asked by
Graham P Jones (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
5 July 2018
Reference
644 c473
House
House of Commons

As the hon. Gentleman will be aware, we are already investing £1.5 billion in road systems in the north-west. Of course the M65 is, in a way, a legendary road because it ends in a carpark, and no one thinks that is a satisfactory arrangement. I would welcome a further conversation with him about this, but the situation is far from straightforward.

Answered by
Jesse Norman (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
5 July 2018
Reference
644 c473
House
House of Commons

Will Ministers also look favourably on restoring a rail link between Keighley and Colne by restoring the Skipton to Colne rail link,

starting in the Government Chief Whip’s constituency? Will they look carefully at the feasibility study that is under way?

Asked by
John Grogan (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
5 July 2018
Reference
644 c473
House
House of Commons

That is something we will certainly be looking at carefully.

Answered by
Jesse Norman (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
5 July 2018
Reference
644 c474
House
House of Commons

The northern powerhouse is supposedly a cornerstone of Government policy, but it was not mentioned in yesterday’s Budget statement. When are the Government going to facilitate a debate on the northern powerhouse, so that we can talk about the most significant project that needs to be completed: the M65 east-west...

Member
Graham P Jones (Labour)
Type
Business questions
Date
9 March 2017
Reference
622 c957
House
House of Commons

I am glad the hon. Gentleman has raised the northern powerhouse, because the Government have set out a northern powerhouse strategy to boost productivity throughout the north of England. The next steps include moves on the northern powerhouse schools strategy; more than half a billion pounds of local growth fund...

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2017
Reference
622 c958
House
House of Commons

The policy of transferring to local highway authorities the responsibility for trunk roads that are considered to be non-core was first set out in the White Paper ““A New Deal for Transport””, published in July 1998 (Cm 3950). Following advice from the Highways Agency, informed by discussions with the relevant...

Member
Tom Harris (Labour)
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Written statements
Date
8 October 2007
Reference
464 c24WS
House
House of Commons

My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport (Tom Harris) has made the following Ministerial Statement. The policy of transferring to local highway authorities the responsibility for trunk roads that are considered to be non-core was first set out in the White Paper A New Deal for Transport,...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Written statements
Date
8 October 2007
Reference
695 c20WS
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make a statement on plans for trial use of the hard shoulder as a running lane on the M65.

Asked by
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 October 2005
Reference
20345; 438 c232W;438 c232W
House
House of Commons

That this House recognises that the motorway services at junction 4 of the M65 are clearly located in Darwen, Lancashire; notes with concern therefore that these services are still described as the Blackburn services; believes this to be an outrageous and continuing denial of the wishes of the people of...

Primary sponsor
Janet Anderson (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
17 July 2003
Reference
1620
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, by whom the decision was made to name the Services at junction 4 of the M65 motorway The Blackburn Services; and who was consulted before the decision was taken. - Text of letter from Tim Matthews of Highways Agency.

Asked by
Janet Anderson (Labour)
Answering body
Highways Agency
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 January 2003
Reference
91934; 398 c513-4W;398 c511-2W
House
House of Commons

SI 2000/2705 (Negative instrument). Coming into force 30 October 2000.

Department
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
4 October 2000
Reference
SI 2000/2705
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, for what reasons resurfacing work is being carried out on parts of the M65 at Blackburn. - Text of letter from Lawrie Haynes of Highways Agency.

Asked by
Gordon Prentice (Labour)
Answering body
Highways Agency
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 November 1998
Reference
319 c483W; 59473
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, what was the cost per mile of constructing the M6-M65 link.

Asked by
Gordon Prentice (Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 February 1998
Reference
26407; 306 c225-6W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, what assessment he has made of the impact on Colne of the increased traffic resulting from the completion of the M65-M6 link. - Inc figs.

Asked by
Gordon Prentice (Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 January 1998
Reference
304 c715W;304 c709W; 23373
House
House of Commons