Skip to main content

1-20 of 106 results for subject:Marconi

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I thank my hon. Friend for securing the debate, because it is pertinent to the people who are represented here. I can see four MPs here—one from Coventry, two from Liverpool and me, the MP for Chorley—who have had or who still have in their constituency factories for Telent/Plessis/Marconi, whichever...

Member
Lindsay Hoyle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2008
Reference
472 c227WH
House
House of Commons

It is significant that my hon. Friends the Members for Chorley (Mr. Hoyle), for Knowsley, South (Mr. O'Hara) and for Coventry, South (Mr. Cunningham) are here, because we all have large numbers of Marconi pensioners among our constituents. I know that my hon. Friend the Member for Chorley has some...

Member
George Howarth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2008
Reference
472 c227-8WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend has again raised a very pertinent point, and I will cover that issue towards the end of my speech. So strong are the concerns about the approach of Pension Corporation that a strong case is being put for an urgent review to clarify the regulatory framework for...

Member
George Howarth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2008
Reference
472 c227WH
House
House of Commons

It is a great pleasure to respond to this important debate under your chairmanship, Mr. Marshall. My right hon. Friend the Member for Knowsley, North and Sefton, East (Mr. Howarth) and other colleagues have raised an important issue in relation to Telent/Marconi. To lose one's pension is to suffer an...

Member
Mike O'Brien (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2008
Reference
472 c228-9WH
House
House of Commons

What a pleasure it is to have the opportunity to raise this important issue in the debate today. There are concerns about the so-called defined benefit market and pension buy-outs. The Marconi/Telent pension fund involves an unusual approach by a Guernsey-based company, Pension Corporation, to buy out the whole company...

Member
George Howarth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2008
Reference
472 c226WH
House
House of Commons

As my hon. Friend is quoting Mr. Truell, is he aware of another quotation from him? In Mr. Truell's own words, when Pension Corporation took over Threshers:"““We took a number of steps. We replaced the company's trustees with our own partners.””" Does that sound rather ominous to my hon. Friend?

Member
Edward O'Hara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2008
Reference
472 c227WH
House
House of Commons

Before my hon. Friend moves on, it is worth noting that the value of the company is £200 million and the value of the pension fund is £3 billion. That shows the scale of the fund.

Member
Edward O'Hara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2008
Reference
472 c226WH
House
House of Commons

Typically, my hon. Friend makes a strong point, and it raises a question: why is Pension Corporation interested in Marconi/Telent? As I say, 93 per cent. of the buy-out is to be funded on a conventional insurance buy-out basis, which means that Pension Corporation cannot touch the funds for 12...

Member
George Howarth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2008
Reference
472 c226WH
House
House of Commons

I know that my hon. and learned Friend will deal with all the issues, but may I say that we are talking about past pensioners, current employees and future employees? We must also look after future employees, although I do not know whether my hon. and learned Friend can discuss...

Member
Lindsay Hoyle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2008
Reference
472 c229WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is entirely right that we are talking about all three. However, we are talking about not just the pensioners at Telent, but how the financial services industry has decided to deal with pensions. What concerns me is that that seems to involve treating pensions as just another...

Member
Mike O'Brien (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2008
Reference
472 c229WH
House
House of Commons

To put it simply, does the Minister agree that instead of treating a pension as a trust to protect and grow for the benefit of the pensioners, the financial markets see it as an instrument for making profit?

Member
Edward O'Hara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2008
Reference
472 c229WH
House
House of Commons

That is exactly the concern. Until now, companies have broadly regarded pensions as a trust or, in the case of an insurance product, something that is backed by capital, and there has been a relationship with an employer or insurance-based capital backing. Pension Corporation has some very reputable people on...

Member
Mike O'Brien (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2008
Reference
472 c229-30WH
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. and learned Friend for that assurance. I recognise that the relationship between him and the pensions regulator is complicated, but people will be assured that the concern that has been expressed today will be passed on to the regulator.

Member
George Howarth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2008
Reference
472 c230WH
House
House of Commons

I will certainly ensure that that is done and that the regulator is also made aware of the concerns that the Government have about protecting the scheme's future. As I said, I welcome the support that has come from across the industry for the actions of the pensions regulator. When...

Member
Mike O'Brien (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2008
Reference
472 c230WH
House
House of Commons

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on the Marconi pension fund.

Lead member
George Howarth
Answering member
Mike O'Brien
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
26 February 2008
Reference
472 c226-33WH
House
House of Commons

A legitimate vested interest.

Member
George Howarth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2008
Reference
472 c230WH
House
House of Commons

A legitimate vested interest. However, there is also a wider interest, because the pension schemes of members working in other companies and organisations could also be affected by the development of a new model. I want to ensure that the regulator has the right powers to protect people's pensions to...

Member
Mike O'Brien (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2008
Reference
472 c230-1WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. and learned Friend has made a point about the need for capital standing behind the scheme to mitigate risks such as longevity or anticipated longevity, but is not that the problem—the loophole that is not covered by regulatory arrangements in schemes such as Pension Corporation's?

Member
George Howarth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2008
Reference
472 c231WH
House
House of Commons

Of course, Pension Corporation will have its own view on that. As I have said, because there are some quite difficult legal and other issues, I do not want to comment too directly. I want to focus more on the model, and concerns could arise with the model of companies...

Member
Mike O'Brien (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2008
Reference
472 c231-3WH
House
House of Commons

Again, I am grateful to my hon. and learned Friend for that assurance. Will he confirm that trade unions will be included in the definition of ““experts””? He will readily acknowledge that they have a wealth of experience on, and knowledge of, the intricacies of pension funds.

Member
George Howarth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2008
Reference
472 c230WH
House
House of Commons