Skip to main content

1-20 of 32 results for subject:Merseyrail

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if she will bring forward legislation to allow the Mayor of the Liverpool City Region to appoint a public sector operator to run Merseyrail services.

Asked by
Kim Johnson (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 December 2024
Reference
20456
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for that intervention and repeat that it remains to be seen how quickly that can be addressed. That is really our main point—we will scrutinise the Government on how quickly these changes can be delivered, because that is what all our constituents are really asking...

Member
Wera Hobhouse (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2024
Reference
753 cc209-210
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if he will make an assessment of the potential merits of including the devolution of power for the Liverpool City Region to run the Merseyrail network in the public sector.

Asked by
Kim Johnson (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 June 2022
Reference
21332
House
House of Commons

That this House believes that the pandemic has demonstrated beyond doubt the essential nature of cleaning and cleaners on public transport; notes that outsourcing these workers has delivered low pay, exploitation, disputes and corner-cutting in the drive to create profits; further notes that Mitie's contract with Merseyrail comes to an...

Primary sponsor
Dan Carden (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
10 March 2022
Reference
1063
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what recent assessment he has made of the effect of Merseyrail’s decision on passengers to reduce its timetable and increase fares on 4 January 2022 by 3.8 per cent.

Asked by
Damien Moore (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
105792
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for the opportunity to raise in the Chamber the important issue of the future of safety-critical guards on Merseyrail trains.

All of us value the work of the people who keep our country moving, be they guards, drivers, signal workers, track workers, ticket office workers, cleaners or station...

Member
Dan Carden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2017
Reference
631 c1147
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes the point that nobody wants this to happen. He will have seen the letter from the city region of 16 November, which is signed by its six council leaders. It calls for

“both parties in the dispute…to agree to engage in a process of independent conciliation, starting...

Member
George Howarth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2017
Reference
631 c1147
House
House of Commons

I thank my right hon. Friend for that intervention. I will lay out my arguments, including my comments about that issue, in my speech.

I will use this debate to outline why guards are so important for safety, security, service and accessibility, and to highlight the level of public support for...

Member
Dan Carden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2017
Reference
631 c1147
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend welcome the new rolling stock, which will have the best accessibility for disabled people in the whole of the country? Does he think that negotiations to resolve the industrial issue are a matter of urgency so that the people of Merseyside can enjoy the new trains...

Member
Louise Ellman (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2017
Reference
631 c1147
House
House of Commons

Negotiations are of course critical to resolving the dispute, and I absolutely welcome the new trains. They are long overdue and something the unions have campaigned for. They will be publicly owned by the people of the Liverpool city region and are forecast

to be 30% cheaper for the taxpayer...

Member
Dan Carden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2017
Reference
631 cc1147-1150
House
House of Commons

Is my hon. Friend aware that the state-owned operator puts guards on its trains in Holland, but proposes to run a service without them on its Mersey franchise?

Member
Grahame Morris (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2017
Reference
631 c1149
House
House of Commons

I find that incredible. It is not good enough for the people of Merseyside to go without guards when companies that profit from the revenue from those people’s tickets provide guards in other countries.

Instead of pushing DOO, the Government could make passenger safety and the provision of safety-critical guards non-negotiable,...

Member
Dan Carden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2017
Reference
631 c1149
House
House of Commons

Will my hon. Friend give way?

Member
Ian Mearns (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2017
Reference
631 c1149
House
House of Commons

I will not, because I am pushed for time.

For the reasons that I have outlined, I believe that the basis of any resolution must be agreement on the principle of keeping the guard on the train. Last week Merseyrail appointed a new managing director, and that might provide an opportunity...

Member
Dan Carden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2017
Reference
631 cc1149-1151
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Madam Deputy Speaker.

I congratulate the hon. Member for Liverpool, Walton (Dan Carden) on securing the debate, and also on delivering his thoughts in such a cogent and well-balanced way. I am pleased to see that so many Members from both sides...

Member
Paul Maynard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2017
Reference
631 c1151
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Ian Mearns (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2017
Reference
631 c1151
House
House of Commons

Given the lack of available time, it is only fair that if there are interventions, I should devote my responses to the hon. Member for Liverpool, Walton. He can choose the moment at which to launch his salvo in my direction, but I suspect that divergence will increase as my...

Member
Paul Maynard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2017
Reference
631 cc1151-2
House
House of Commons

In my speech, I congratulated Merseytravel on the ability to secure provision of these trains in the public sector, which means that they will be 30% cheaper than if they were bought through private means and private loans. But the one thing we cannot do is have a publicly run...

Member
Dan Carden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2017
Reference
631 c1152
House
House of Commons

I heard the hon. Gentleman’s point earlier. My response is that that is not Government policy and nor do I ever see it being Government policy while my party remains in power. The opportunity to have a public monopoly on our railways may be in the interest of the Labour...

Member
Paul Maynard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2017
Reference
631 c1153
House
House of Commons

I hope that the Minister will respond to the point made by my hon. Friend the Member for Liverpool, Walton (Dan Carden) about the £32 million cut in central Government funding for Merseytravel, which is forcing it to make decisions that it would not want to make if it had...

Member
Stephen Twigg (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2017
Reference
631 c1153
House
House of Commons