Skip to main content

1-20 of 93 results for subject:Netflix

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Will the Secretary of State rule out extending the BBC licence fee to streaming services such as Netflix?

Asked by
Bradley Thomas (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
18 June 2026
Reference
787 c975
House
House of Commons

We have been very careful not to get drawn into speculation about the future funding arrangements for the BBC, except to say that we have ruled out a levy on streamers, and we have also ruled out direct taxation going to fund the BBC because of the need for the BBC to retain its independence. But I look forward to debating this issue with the hon. Member and for the whole House to come together to ensure that we get this right through the charter process.

Answered by
Lisa Nandy (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 June 2026
Reference
787 c975
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Culture, Media and Sport Committee
Date
19 May 2026
Reference
HC 142 2026-27
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Culture, Media and Sport Committee
Date
22 April 2026
Reference
HC 1338 2024-26
House
House of Commons

Is that related to AI or content generally?

Answered by
Baroness Twycross (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c972
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of recent developments in the UK’s streaming and cinema sector, in particular the impact of the bid by Netflix to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery.

Asked by
Lord Black of Brentwood (Conservative)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 cc970-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in begging leave to ask the Question standing in my name on the Order Paper, I declare my interest as deputy chairman of the Telegraph Media Group.

Member
Lord Black of Brentwood (Conservative)
Type
Oral question time interventions
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c970
House
House of Lords

The way we consume entertainment is changing rapidly, driving greater consolidation in the streaming and entertainment markets. Cinemas and independent British content play a vital role in our communities, and DCMS works closely with the BFI and the UK Cinema Association to ensure that they continue to thrive. Given legal and commercial sensitivities, it would not be appropriate to comment on any live or potential merger involving Warner Bros. Discovery; should any transaction by any company progress, it would be up to the CMA to examine its implications for competition and consumers.

Answered by
Baroness Twycross (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c970
House
House of Lords

My Lords, noble Lords will be aware that on Friday, Netflix, doubtless terrified of the prospect of this Oral Question and the ferocious scrutiny of your Lordships’ House, withdrew its bid for Warner Bros. Discovery in favour of Paramount Skydance. Will the Minister join me in welcoming the news, which is good for British consumers, who will continue to benefit from choice in the streaming market, good for our world-class content creators and good for the British cinema industry, which is vital to our high streets? Will she also agree that the bid highlighted the importance of intellectual property and the strength of the UK’s copyright regime and confirm that the Government will continue to protect UK rights holders by ruling out any new copyright exemptions that would allow big tech to scrape UK content with impunity?

Asked by
Lord Black of Brentwood (Conservative)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c970
House
House of Lords

While I do not necessarily agree with the noble Lord’s analysis of the reason Netflix withdrew its bid, the Government recognise the importance of a competitive and diverse streaming market for consumers, creators and the wider screen sector. We also recognise the vital role of intellectual property in a strong copyright regime. That is why the Secretaries of State for DSIT and DCMS are working closely with the creative and AI sectors to consider all potential options and get to the right solution. We have convened expert working groups and parliamentarians, including a number of noble Lords, to inform our approach and will continue to engage stakeholders to ensure that our copyright framework values and protects human creativity. We will publish a comprehensive report and economic impact assessment by 18 March this year.

Answered by
Baroness Twycross (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c971
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Viscount Colville of Culross (Crossbench; Crossbench)
Type
Oral question time interventions
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c971
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Baroness Keeley (Labour)
Type
Oral question time interventions
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c971
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest as a television producer. The Media Act set up prominence for public service broadcasters in the digital space, but it does not cover video-sharing platforms such as YouTube, which is where increasing numbers of young people are watching their content. Now that the BBC has announced a partnership with YouTube, does the Minister agree that the prominence regime should be extended to amplify discoverability of public service broadcasting content on these services?

Asked by
Viscount Colville of Culross (Crossbench; Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c971
House
House of Lords

Public service broadcasters are vital, and it is important for us to recognise how central YouTube is to a number of young people’s access to content. We welcome Ofcom’s recommendation that public service broadcasters and platforms such as YouTube work together urgently to ensure that public service media content is made prominent on fair terms. We are considering Ofcom’s recommendation for legislation to support this. However, we want to see the outcome of these discussions in the first instance and encourage YouTube and PSBs to work together to try to achieve a deeper partnership that could benefit them and audiences. If I have not quite answered the noble Viscount’s question, I am happy to pick that up with him afterwards.

Answered by
Baroness Twycross (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c971
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I join the noble Lord, Lord Black, in welcoming the news that he mentioned and highlighting the importance of intellectual property and the UK’s copyright regime. Other jurisdictions are now moving away from weakening copyright. Australia has ruled out new exceptions, creators are prevailing in cases in the US courts and EU policymakers are exploring stronger rights. Does my noble friend the Minister accept that weakening UK copyright law now would be economically and

strategically misguided, just as the value of high-quality creative content is becoming clearer to AI developers and legislators worldwide?

Asked by
Baroness Keeley (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c971
House
House of Lords

The Government want a copyright regime that values and protects human creativity, can be trusted and unlocks innovation. As I mentioned, expert working groups and a parliamentary working group have been convened and stakeholders will continue to be engaged as Ministers consider all options. I have been told that I can confidently say that we will publish a full report, economic impact assessment and consultation response by 18 March. I look forward to future debates covering the outcome of that process.

Answered by
Baroness Twycross (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c972
House
House of Lords

My Lords, will the Government accept that if we as a nation are to continue to be as successful in this area as we have been, we must look to the training set-up for those who are creating the content? How are the Government encouraging people to take up careers in this, especially at level 4 and 5 qualifications? Will the higher education sector actually take part in providing these services?

Asked by
Lord Addington (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c972
House
House of Lords

Content.

Member
Lord Addington (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral question time interventions
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c972
House
House of Lords

In relation to the screen workforce and skills, we are investing across the skills pipeline: there is £10 million for the National Film and Television School expansion, and we are scaling up the British Film Institute Film Academy and delivering short stories through the growth and skills levy. We are keen that young people and people throughout their careers can access opportunities to be part of what we consider to be one of the jewels in Britain’s creative crown.

Answered by
Baroness Twycross (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c972
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Government are considering a commercial research exception that would deny streamers the right to withhold consent for use of content when it is used in research and development, but all AI pretraining is technically R&D. Does the Minister accept that this would fatally undermine licensing markets, with payment only at a point of market entry after a leverage is lost? The best thing the Government could do is to rule out any such exception.

Asked by
Earl of Effingham (Conservative; Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c972
House
House of Lords