Skip to main content

1-20 of 223 results for subject:Parcelforce

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Deposited by
Cabinet Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
19 July 2022
Reference
DEP2022-0626
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what discussions his Department has had with representatives of OFCOM on ensuring that (a) Royal Mail Group plc and (b) Parcelforce Worldwide are adapting to recent changes implemented in line with the requirements of the Northern Ireland Protocol...

Asked by
Claire Hanna (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 March 2021
Reference
169072
House
House of Commons

It has been reported that Royal Mail is looking to recruit a director to run its UK operations. I would suggest that the next director stand with postal workers on protecting jobs and terms and conditions, and opposing the selling off of Parcelforce. Does the Leader of the House agree,...

Member
Hugh Gaffney (Labour)
Type
Business questions
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 c1381
House
House of Commons

I am afraid that I think private companies must make their own decisions.

Member
Jacob Rees-Mogg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 c1381
House
House of Commons

Royal Mail Group is trying to sell off Parcelforce as a separate business. Communication workers will be ready to strike and take action. With an election possibly coming up, will there be a statement from the Government?

Member
Hugh Gaffney (Labour)
Type
Business questions
Date
5 September 2019
Reference
664 c407
House
House of Commons

I am sure that no responsible person would go on strike to interrupt the democratic process of a general election.

Member
Jacob Rees-Mogg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 September 2019
Reference
664 c1116
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for her response, which I am a little disappointed by but hope she will reflect on. I reserve the right to bring this matter back on Report. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 9 withdrawn. . Amendment 10 Moved by

Member
Lord Kennedy of Southwark (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c46
House
House of Lords

I am tempted, especially by the last speaker. I am sure that every Liberal candidate in Scotland will welcome his intervention, but I can assure noble Lords that every Labour candidate will welcome it even more. The noble Lord mentioned the ““outer”” areas. Such contempt—such arrogance and such an unctuous...

Member
Lord McAvoy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c114-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the purpose of this amendment is to ensure that the proceeds of any sale of Royal Mail are invested in the post office network and the delivery of the universal postal service. In our debate in this House at Second Reading, the Minister explained what would happen to...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c63-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I tend to agree with my noble friend Lady Kramer on this. Although what comes out of the discussion on this amendment will be valuable to our future discussions, as it is it rather puts the cart before the horse. As far as the noble Baroness, Lady Drake,...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c70-1
House
House of Lords

No, I actually said that the noble Lord, instead of making party-political, snide comments, should actually learn the facts. The facts are that the Royal Mail at the moment is seriously under pressure delivering to Norwood Green and Hampstead, not to outer Wales, which is easy for Royal Mail to...

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c114
House
House of Lords

I cannot say that we are completely satisfied with the noble Baroness’s response. Nevertheless, we shall reflect on it between now and Report. In those circumstances, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 8 withdrawn. Amendment 9 Moved by

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c44
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I fully appreciate the sentiment behind the amendment. The name ““Royal Mail”” has been synonymous with the delivery of the postal service in the United Kingdom for hundreds of years. In fact, the noble Lord, Lord Kennedy, has told us the date on which it was established, and...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c44-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I normally try to avoid rising before the Minister’s response. Although the noble Lord does not know my name, I think that he is the noble Lord, Lord McAvoy. One of the conventions in this House is that if you are going to be rude to somebody, as...

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c116
House
House of Lords

The noble suggested that people were not telling the truth. I do not know where he has been this evening—perhaps he has had a very good dinner. However, it is quite improper without any evidence to suggest that either I or the noble Lord, Lord Low—he followed both of us—were...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c116
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not wish to get involved in this particular exchange, but I declare an interest as a Member of the Northern Ireland Assembly. The point that the noble Lord, Lord McAvoy, makes is valid. Like it or not, people who are furthest away from the centre in...

Member
Lord Empey (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c116
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I say to the noble Lord, Lord McAvoy, that I remember, not that long ago when we were standing not that far apart on the Floor in the other place, when he whipped his rather unwilling troops in to vote for the closure of 4,000 local post offices....

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c117-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, somewhat later than planned, I rise to support both Amendment 16 in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Low, and Amendment 16A in the name of my noble friend Lord Touhig. We can be proud that the universal service includes the six day a week, price goes...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c118-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I suppose that I ought to start by saying that I live in Cornwall, which may put the Committee’s mind at rest. I have some idea about the differences of living in Cornwall and in the centre of London. Indeed, I apologise, for so does the noble Baroness,...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c119-20
House
House of Lords

I am sure that the Minister is right about the attentiveness of the Bill team in the Box; they all look exceedingly alert to me—bright eyed and bushy tailed. I just want to be sure what we are seeking, as it is not the guarantee that the universal service will...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c120
House
House of Lords