Skip to main content

1-20 of 204 results for subject:Perjury

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, with reference to his Oral Statement of 14 July 2021, Official Report, column 388, whether the offence of perjury in respect of Troubles-related incidents will be subject to the proposed statute of limitation.

Asked by
Claire Hanna (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Answering body
Northern Ireland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 July 2021
Reference
34080
House
House of Commons

My Lords, I am grateful for the clarity with which the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, has spoken and am glad to follow him in this debate. I can speak today with direct experience of the work of IICSA and its handling of evidence. In March this year, the inquiry held...

Member
Bishop of Chichester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2018
Reference
794 cc1978-1980
House
House of Lords

It was given in a public session; it was streamed live, and a transcript was made. Both the transcript and the stream are available on the IICSA website.

Member
Bishop of Chichester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2018
Reference
794 c1980
House
House of Lords

It was an inquiry and not a judicial court. There was, as I have described, robust examination, but there was never what I would call cross-examination which led to intimidation. I was asked clearly and cogently about my knowledge and understanding of the safeguarding procedures. I would not say that...

Member
Bishop of Chichester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2018
Reference
794 c1980
House
House of Lords

I was not present for the oral statements given by survivors, but survivors were also able to do that and were called to give evidence as well.

In Chichester, our safeguarding practice benefits significantly from the full engagement at a senior level by the police, the probation service and adult and...

Member
Bishop of Chichester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2018
Reference
794 cc1980-1
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord, Lord Lexden, for his speech. Does he agree with me that it would be inappropriate to comment on the ongoing investigation into matters surrounding Bishop George Bell while we do not know the date on which that investigation is going to report?

Member
Bishop of Chichester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2018
Reference
794 c1985
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for asking me to clarify that. I was going to say that I am unable to confirm at this stage whether my right honourable friend the Home Secretary is preparing a letter but I confirm that, as I reported to the House earlier this week,...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2018
Reference
794 cc1996-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we all welcome the IICSA inquiry. Unfortunately, an early start was hampered by chairmanship difficulties, and a seamless process under the Inquires Act has become mired in controversy with the disbandment of panels, the removal of chairmen, a churn in staff and questions over remit.

The original remit was...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2018
Reference
794 cc1972-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I draw attention to my interests declared in the register, in particular my tenure as honorary chair of the Sir Edward Heath Charitable Foundation until earlier this year. I congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Campbell-Savours, on securing this debate and associate myself with all the points he so...

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2018
Reference
794 cc1977-9
House
House of Lords

Was the evidence given in a public session?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2018
Reference
794 c1980
House
House of Lords

Was it cross-examined?

Member
Lord Winston (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2018
Reference
794 c1980
House
House of Lords

The right reverend Prelate referred to survivors. Were they not cross-examined as well?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2018
Reference
794 c1980
House
House of Lords

My Lords, one of the great merits of this most welcome debate, for which we are indebted to the noble Lord, Lord Campbell-Savours, is that it helps to focus attention again on a serious issue with which, like the noble Lord and other participants in this debate, I have been...

Member
Lord Lexden (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2018
Reference
794 cc1981-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Finkelstein (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2018
Reference
794 c1985
House
House of Lords

The right reverend Prelate is intervening on me, so my noble friend Lord Lexden cannot reply.

I shall start with the words that noble Lords most dread—“It is not my intention today to make a long speech”. I intend only a short intervention to express concerns about the proposed treatment of...

Member
Lord Finkelstein (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2018
Reference
794 cc1985-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful for permission to speak briefly in the gap. I have just come back from an overseas trip, which is why my name was not on the list. I am speaking simply because I felt that in a debate such as this it was very...

Member
Lord Winston (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2018
Reference
794 cc1986-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, am very grateful for the opportunity to speak in the gap in this debate. I wanted to take part in the debate, but felt some inhibition about doing so for two reasons. First, I was briefly instructed on behalf of the estate of the late Greville...

Member
Lord Faulks (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2018
Reference
794 cc1987-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Campbell-Savours for securing this debate. Its timing is to be regretted, as it has not allowed as many noble Lords to participate as would have liked to.

I do not intend to talk about the individual cases of Lord Janner, Sir...

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2018
Reference
794 cc1988-1990
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is a sad and delicate subject for our last substantive debate before Christmas, but the fact that it has been such a non-partisan and thoughtful debate makes it important and appropriate none the less. It also gives me a belated opportunity to welcome the Minister, the noble...

Member
Baroness Chakrabarti (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2018
Reference
794 cc1990-1
House
House of Lords

I am very grateful to the noble Baroness to allow me briefly to intervene. One of the problems is that dead people cannot sue for defamation. That may be an omission but it is an important one.

Member
Lord Faulks (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2018
Reference
794 c1991
House
House of Lords