Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,899 results for subject:Pipelines

Type

-
Early day motions (9)
+ Legislation (84) + Acts (6) + Private acts (1)
-
Local acts (1)
-
Public acts (5)
+ Bills (6)
-
Private bills (1)
+ Public bills (5)
-
Consolidation bills (1)
-
Government bills (4)
+ Delegated legislation (72) + Statutory instruments (72)
-
Deregulation orders (1)
+ Members' contributions (1,134)
-
Business questions (3)
-
Oral answers to questions (42)
+ Oral questions (46)
-
Prime Minister's questions (2)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (1,046)
+ Parliamentary committees (51) + Committee proceedings (33)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (4)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (7)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (17)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
-
Select Committee reports (13)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (2)
-
Select Committee written evidence (4)
+ Parliamentary papers (132)
-
Command papers (18)
-
Consultation papers (6)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (1)
-
Deposited papers (42)
-
House of Commons papers (19)
-
House of Lords papers (9)
-
Impact assessments (25)
-
Proposed negative statutory instruments (3)
-
Treaties (14)
-
Unprinted command papers (3)
+ Unprinted papers (18)
-
Draft deregulation orders (proposal) (1)
-
National Policy Statements (final proposal) (2)
-
National Policy Statements (initial proposal) (3)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (128) + Debates (61)
-
Adjournment debates (7)
+ Committee proceedings (33)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (4)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (7)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (17)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
-
Debates on select committee reports (3)
-
Emergency debate applications (1)
+ Legislative debates (44)
-
Debates on bills (31)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (13)
-
Questions for short debate (1)
+ Formal proceedings (5)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (5)
-
Private notice questions (3)
+ Statements (54) + Oral statements (6)
-
Ministerial statements (6)
-
Written statements (48)
-
Urgent questions (1)
+ Written corrections (2)
-
Ministerial corrections (2)
+ Parliamentary questions (457)
-
Business questions (3)
+ Oral questions (46)
-
Prime Minister's questions (2)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Private notice questions (3)
-
Urgent questions (1)
-
Written questions (404)
+ Research briefings (6) + Commons Briefing papers (4)
-
Briefing papers on bills (1)
-
Commons Debate packs (1)
-
POSTnotes (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much was the purchase of the Finnart Oil Terminal.

Asked by
James MacCleary (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
18897
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Michael Shanks
Department
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
20 July 2026
Reference
SI 2026/853
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what mechanisms are in place to help ensure oil and gas companies remain liable for the decommissioning costs of wells and pipelines within marine protected areas, including where operators cease trading or sell on licences.

Asked by
Neil Duncan-Jordan (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 July 2026
Reference
15882
House
House of Commons

Lords statement on the defence investment plan.

Lead member
Lord Coaker
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 cc1069-1083
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for both the briefing and prior sight of the defence investment plan, which he provided to me and my colleague, the noble Earl, Lord Minto, yesterday. I doubt any plan was so dogged by delay and preceded by such drama as this one, but...

Member
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 cc1073-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is clearly a very delayed and extremely underfunded plan. As we have heard, at £15 billion it falls well short of the £28 billion requested by the defence chief to keep our country secure. But we know that it actually falls even shorter than that, as nearly...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 cc1074-6
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord, Lord Fox, and the noble Baroness, Lady Goldie, for their contributions and important questions.

I will start by dealing with the question of spending, which goes to the heart of what both noble Lords were saying. Let me put on record some of the things that...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 cc1076-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, all European countries are struggling with coming to terms with new realities and what that requires for their defence and equipment to be appropriate to modern warfare. However, irrespective of the money and the percentages spent, if we do not start the national conversation—which we have been talking...

Member
Baroness Stuart of Edgbaston (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1078
House
House of Lords

Indeed, we will come forward with proposals and plans with respect to a national conversation. The noble Baroness is right in her suggestion. We can see—many Members of this House will know this—that some of the ways in which the Government have asked different departments to contribute to this uplift...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1078
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome part of this plan—it obviously has some holes in it, as we have already heard. I also welcome, as I do every time I hear the Minister speak, a great deal of his comments and his profound thinking. However, I wonder today whether the brief he...

Member
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 cc1078-9
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for his question and his comments, which come from a great knowledge and experience, and I thank him for his remarks about me. Just to reiterate, the GCAP programme is extremely important, and as he just said, that is outlined in the money allocated within...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1079
House
House of Lords

First, I welcome this Statement, which this House has been waiting on for some time, and share my concerns about the funding, which I hope will be sorted out under new leadership. However, I welcome the fact that there is an emphasis on innovation and supporting small businesses, and I...

Member
Baroness Foster of Aghadrumsee (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1079
House
House of Lords

I cannot give the noble Baroness an assurance about what the Republic will pay for, but let me just say that there has been improved and increasing co-operation between the Republic and ourselves where it is in both our interests to do so. She will know that underwater cables and...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1079
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Teverson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1079
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Viscount Stansgate (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1079
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome the publication of the defence investment plan and the recognition in it that science, technology and innovation are going to play a very big part in the future. Does my noble friend agree that it is not just a financial challenge that faces the defence investment...

Member
Viscount Stansgate (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1080
House
House of Lords

Indeed, as I said to the noble Baroness, of course we need a conversation to more fully and carefully explain to the public why we need to increase our expenditure on defence and security and, alongside that, to help them to understand why that might mean changed priorities for budgets...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1080
House
House of Lords

My Lords, one of the unfortunate realities is that the United States is moving away from the defence of Europe. Whether we like it or not, this is not just for this Administration; it is a danger that is likely to happen in future as well as the US looks...

Member
Lord Teverson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1080
House
House of Lords

There is a lot in the strategic defence review and the Defence Investment Plan about building up a greater sovereign capability in some of the areas that the noble Lord has addressed. But I think it is important in every debate to say that the alliance between the United States...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1080
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I share widely the view that this belated DIP comes nowhere near funding the strategic defence review, but the DIP does make clear the Government’s commitment, together

with Japan and Italy, to the next-generation Global Combat Air Programme. This is welcome news, given the inevitable withdrawal of the...

Member
Lord Craig of Radley (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1080
House
House of Lords