1-11 of 11 results for subject:Pyestock
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.188 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.001 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Pyestock
- We searched for
- subject_t:Pyestock
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
All the schools in my constituency have benefited immensely from the investment of this Government in terms of both staffing and capital costs. Just last week, the Great Yarmouth high school heard an announcement that it was going to receive £12.5 million from the Building Schools for the Future fund. Can my right hon. and learned Friend guarantee that any future Labour Government will continue with that Building Schools for the Future fund to ensure that investment in education continues?
All the schools in my constituency have benefited immensely from the investment of this Government in terms of both staffing and capital costs. Just last week, the Great Yarmouth high school heard an announcement that it was going to receive £12.5 million from the Building Schools for the Future fund. Can my right hon. and learned Friend guarantee that any future Labour Government will continue with that Building Schools for the Future fund to ensure that investment in education continues?
Asked by
Anthony D Wright
(Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
16 December 2009
The Building Schools for the Future fund has been important not only to make up the backlog and legacy of disrepair in our schools but in ensuring that our young people and children are educated in the best possible facilities. It has also provided much-needed help for the construction industry at a time when private sector construction has been facing tremendous difficulties. That is one of the reasons why we have not pulled the plug on public investment in construction in the way that the Conservatives have insisted that we should.
Subjects
Building schools for the future programme; Planning permission; Pyestock
Date
16 December 2009
Reference
502 c963
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
On the subject of the Geneva Conventions Act, will my right hon. and learned Friend take this opportunity to reassert the principle of judicial independence and, in particular, the power of the courts to issue criminal process against anybody—whatever side they are on, whatever their status, rank or influence against whom good prima facie evidence has been laid?
On the subject of the Geneva Conventions Act, will my right hon. and learned Friend take this opportunity to reassert the principle of judicial independence and, in particular, the power of the courts to issue criminal process against anybody—whatever side they are on, whatever their status, rank or influence against whom good prima facie evidence has been laid?
Asked by
Robert Marshall-Andrews
(Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
16 December 2009
Of course that is the case. The courts act judicially and independently under the framework of law, both national and international, and we have to make sure that we not only guarantee judicial independence, but have the right legal framework.
Subjects
Courts; Administration of justice; Planning permission; Pyestock
Date
16 December 2009
Reference
502 c964
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Is the Leader of the House aware that a planning application to build a massive distribution centre at Pyestock, on the border of my constituency and that of my right hon. Friend the Member for North-East Hampshire (Mr. Arbuthnot), was refused by the local authority? The appeal was rejected by the inspector, yet an unelected Minister, Lord McKenzie, who knows nothing about the area, allowed the planning application to go through. Is this what the Government mean by supporting local democracy?
Is the Leader of the House aware that a planning application to build a massive distribution centre at Pyestock, on the border of my constituency and that of my right hon. Friend the Member for North-East Hampshire (Mr. Arbuthnot), was refused by the local authority? The appeal was rejected by the inspector, yet an unelected Minister, Lord McKenzie, who knows nothing about the area, allowed the planning application to go through. Is this what the Government mean by supporting local democracy?
Asked by
Gerald Howarth
(Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
16 December 2009
The hon. Gentleman will know what the planning processes involve. They have been laid out and agreed under statute by this House, and if he had any proposals, he should have put them forward in the Planning Bill.
Subjects
Planning permission; Pyestock
Date
16 December 2009
Reference
502 c962
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
I cannot assist the right hon. Gentleman further except to repeat my answer to the hon. Member for Aldershot (Mr. Howarth). These are decisions made under a legal framework. They are made as ministerial decisions, but in the public interest. One public interest that the planning system is determined to promote is employment, and I would have thought that the right hon. Gentleman agreed with that.
I cannot assist the right hon. Gentleman further except to repeat my answer to the hon. Member for Aldershot (Mr. Howarth). These are decisions made under a legal framework. They are made as ministerial decisions, but in the public interest. One public interest that the planning system is determined to promote is employment, and I would have thought that the right hon. Gentleman agreed with that.
Answered by
Baroness Harman
(Labour)
Asked by
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom
(Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
My hon. Friend the Member for Aldershot (Mr. Howarth) has mentioned the mega Pyestock warehouse on the borders of our constituencies. Is the deputy Prime Minister aware that the decision of the noble Lord, overruling 12,000 local residents and the local councils and her own inspector, was taken in the rather doubtful interests of employment, but against the interests—[Interruption.]—because the jobs the Minister suggested might be created are very doubtful—but against the interests—
Subjects
Planning permission; Pyestock
Date
16 December 2009
Reference
502 c963-4
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
My hon. Friend the Member for Aldershot (Mr. Howarth) has mentioned the mega Pyestock warehouse on the borders of our constituencies. Is the deputy Prime Minister aware that the decision of the noble Lord, overruling 12,000 local residents and the local councils and her own inspector, was taken in the rather doubtful interests of employment, but against the interests—[Interruption.]—because the jobs the Minister suggested might be created are very doubtful—but against the interests—
My hon. Friend the Member for Aldershot (Mr. Howarth) has mentioned the mega Pyestock warehouse on the borders of our constituencies. Is the deputy Prime Minister aware that the decision of the noble Lord, overruling 12,000 local residents and the local councils and her own inspector, was taken in the rather doubtful interests of employment, but against the interests—[Interruption.]—because the jobs the Minister suggested might be created are very doubtful—but against the interests—
Asked by
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom
(Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
16 December 2009
I cannot assist the right hon. Gentleman further except to repeat my answer to the hon. Member for Aldershot (Mr. Howarth). These are decisions made under a legal framework. They are made as ministerial decisions, but in the public interest. One public interest that the planning system is determined to promote is employment, and I would have thought that the right hon. Gentleman agreed with that.
Subjects
Planning permission; Pyestock
Date
16 December 2009
Reference
502 c963-4
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Of course that is the case. The courts act judicially and independently under the framework of law, both national and international, and we have to make sure that we not only guarantee judicial independence, but have the right legal framework.
Of course that is the case. The courts act judicially and independently under the framework of law, both national and international, and we have to make sure that we not only guarantee judicial independence, but have the right legal framework.
Answered by
Baroness Harman
(Labour)
Asked by
Robert Marshall-Andrews
(Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
On the subject of the Geneva Conventions Act, will my right hon. and learned Friend take this opportunity to reassert the principle of judicial independence and, in particular, the power of the courts to issue criminal process against anybody—whatever side they are on, whatever their status, rank or influence against whom good prima facie evidence has been laid?
Subjects
Planning permission; Pyestock
Date
16 December 2009
Reference
502 c964
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Asked by
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom
(Conservative)
Answered by
Baroness Harman
(Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Answered on
16 December 2009
Notes
Lead question not printed.
Subjects
Planning permission; Pyestock
Date
16 December 2009
Reference
502 c963-4; 307394
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Asked by
Gerald Howarth
(Conservative)
Answered by
Baroness Harman
(Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Answered on
16 December 2009
Notes
Lead question not printed.
Subjects
Planning permission; Pyestock
Date
16 December 2009
Reference
502 c962; 307392
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
The hon. Gentleman will know what the planning processes involve. They have been laid out and agreed under statute by this House, and if he had any proposals, he should have put them forward in the Planning Bill.
The hon. Gentleman will know what the planning processes involve. They have been laid out and agreed under statute by this House, and if he had any proposals, he should have put them forward in the Planning Bill.
Answered by
Baroness Harman
(Labour)
Asked by
Gerald Howarth
(Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Is the Leader of the House aware that a planning application to build a massive distribution centre at Pyestock, on the border of my constituency and that of my right hon. Friend the Member for North-East Hampshire (Mr. Arbuthnot), was refused by the local authority? The appeal was rejected by the inspector, yet an unelected Minister, Lord McKenzie, who knows nothing about the area, allowed the planning application to go through. Is this what the Government mean by supporting local democracy?
Subjects
Planning permission; Pyestock
Date
16 December 2009
Reference
502 c962
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
The Building Schools for the Future fund has been important not only to make up the backlog and legacy of disrepair in our schools but in ensuring that our young people and children are educated in the best possible facilities. It has also provided much-needed help for the construction industry at a time when private sector construction has been facing tremendous difficulties. That is one of the reasons why we have not pulled the plug on public investment in construction in the way that the Conservatives have insisted that we should.
The Building Schools for the Future fund has been important not only to make up the backlog and legacy of disrepair in our schools but in ensuring that our young people and children are educated in the best possible facilities. It has also provided much-needed help for the construction industry at a time when private sector construction has been facing tremendous difficulties. That is one of the reasons why we have not pulled the plug on public investment in construction in the way that the Conservatives have insisted that we should.
Answered by
Baroness Harman
(Labour)
Asked by
Anthony D Wright
(Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
All the schools in my constituency have benefited immensely from the investment of this Government in terms of both staffing and capital costs. Just last week, the Great Yarmouth high school heard an announcement that it was going to receive £12.5 million from the Building Schools for the Future fund. Can my right hon. and learned Friend guarantee that any future Labour Government will continue with that Building Schools for the Future fund to ensure that investment in education continues?
Subjects
Planning permission; Pyestock
Date
16 December 2009
Reference
502 c963
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of the consequences for the development of future generations of military aero engines of the closure of DERA Ryestock's aero engine testing facilities. - (Holding answer 20 June 2000).
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of the consequences for the development of future generations of military aero engines of the closure of DERA Ryestock's aero engine testing facilities. - (Holding answer 20 June 2000).
Asked by
Gerald Howarth
(Conservative)
Answered by
Geoffrey Hoon
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
15 June 2000
For answer on
22 June 2000
Answered on
22 June 2000
Mr. Gerald Howarth: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment he has made of the consequences for the development of
future generations of military aero engines of the closure of DERA Ryestock's aero engine testing facilities. [127090]
Mr. Hoon: [holding answer 20 June 2000]: On completion of the current engine programme for the Eurofighter project in 2002, there
will be insufficient future work to justify the retention of the altitude test facilities at DERA Pyestock. There is no Ministry of
Defence strategic requirement to retain the facilities. We are satisfied that there will be scope for engine suppliers to make
appropriate alternative arrangements.
Subjects
Engines; Military aircraft; Defence Evaluation and Research Agency; Pyestock
Date
22 June 2000
Reference
127090; 352 c240W
House
House of Commons